|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-exportHello, I googled a bit on this question but could not find a clear answer : is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow am a bit waterfearing changing the nfsèoptions which worked great till now. Thank you in advance, regards, Arno _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
RE: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-exportZFS makes its own version of the exports file.
Just do it that way, and be safe. You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter.... -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@... US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@... [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@...] On Behalf Of Arno J. Klaassen Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:46 PM To: freebsd-fs@... Cc: freebsd-net@... Subject: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export Hello, I googled a bit on this question but could not find a clear answer : is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow am a bit waterfearing changing the nfsèoptions which worked great till now. Thank you in advance, regards, Arno _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@..." _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-exporthello, "Larry Rosenman" <ler@...> writes: > ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. > > Just do it that way, and be safe. > > You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter.... ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering. I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example : zfs set sharenfs='rw=@.../16,root=neo' tank/home This syntax does not seem to work for me (8.0RC2). Maybe an extra line could be added that one can just set the sharenfs property to exactly the same character string as in /etc/exports. Once again, merci. Arno _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-exportArno J. Klaassen wrote:
> hello, > > "Larry Rosenman" <ler@...> writes: > >> ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. >> >> Just do it that way, and be safe. >> >> You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter.... > > ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering. > > I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example : > > zfs set sharenfs='rw=@.../16,root=neo' tank/home > > This syntax does not seem to work for me (8.0RC2). > Maybe an extra line could be added that one can just set > the sharenfs property to exactly the same character string > as in /etc/exports. Yeah that is the solaris notation -- various things in the manpages have not yet been customized for FreeBSD, which can be a bit confusing. The only limitation I've found in using sharenfs is that you can't specify multiple exports for the same filesystem, e.g. exporting to different hosts/networks with different options. The solaris notation above allows you to express this. Kris _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-exportOn Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> > Hello, > > I googled a bit on this question but could not find > a clear answer : > > is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting > a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old > way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off? > > I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly > linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow > am a bit waterfearing changing the nfsèoptions which worked > great till now. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@... http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |