Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> apropos fast or apropos ipsec shows:
>
> Fast IPsec (4) - hardware-accelerated IP Security Protocols
>
> But "Fast IPsec" is not a manual page.
>
> Should I use the following patch or should I make a MLINKS to create "Fast
> IPsec.4" (filename with a space in it)? I think space is wrong for some
> systems.
>
> Index: share/man/man4/fast_ipsec.4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/share/man/man4/fast_ipsec.4,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -r1.7 fast_ipsec.4
> --- share/man/man4/fast_ipsec.4 25 May 2008 20:08:12 -0000 1.7
> +++ share/man/man4/fast_ipsec.4 23 Apr 2009 13:34:19 -0000
> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
> .Dt FAST_IPSEC 4
> .Os
> .Sh NAME
> -.Nm "Fast IPsec"
> -.Nd hardware-accelerated IP Security Protocols
> +.Nm fast_ipsec
> +.Nd Fast IPsec hardware-accelerated IP Security Protocols
> .Sh SYNOPSIS
> .Cd "options FAST_IPSEC"
> .Cd "options IPSEC_NAT_T"
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> .Tn IPComp
> (for IP Payload Compression Protocol)
> that provide security services for IP datagrams.
> -.Nm
> +Fast IPsec
> is an implementation of these protocols that uses the
> .Xr opencrypto 9
> subsystem to carry out cryptographic operations.
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
> employed whenever possible to optimize the performance of these protocols.
> .Pp
> In general, the
> -.Nm
> +Fast IPsec
> implementation is intended to be compatible with the
> .Tn KAME IPsec
> implementation.
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
> .Xr opencrypto 9
> subsystem.
> When the
> -.Nm
> +Fast IPsec
> protocols are configured for use, all protocols are included in the system.
> To selectively enable/disable protocols, use
> .Xr sysctl 8 .
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> .Tn IPsec
> protocols.
> The
> -.Nm
> +Fast IPsec
> protocols are based on code which appeared in
> .Fx 4.7 .
> The
You are correct, the man-page is wrong. To me both the first chunk of
the diff, and all of it seem fine, so commit whatever you choose. :)
I think netbsd-docs@ is too quiet btw. Perhaps you should always mail
just tech-userlevel@?
Thanks,
-e.