|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
acpi(4) corrections, clarificationsWhile this documentation cleanup is going on, I'd like to point out
that acpi(4) could use some improvements: (1)In the "SYSCTL VARIABLES" section, under hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest, acpi(4) states "To enable ACPI CPU idling control, machdep.cpu_idle_hlt must be set to 1". However, apparently only the pc98 port still uses this OID, while amd64, i386, etc., use something like machdep.idle=hlt, so this remark should be changed. And in any case, is this statement correct? Can't idling now be used with other values of machdep.idle, like mwait, mwait_hlt, amdc1e, hlt, and acpi? (2)Under the "BUGS" section, acpi(4) states: "The acpi CPU idle power management drive conflicts with the local APIC (LAPIC) timer. Disable APIC mode with hint.apic.0.disabled or do not use the C2 and C3 states if APIC mode is enabled." However, mav@, in his recent series of recommendations on power-saving, advocated the use of hints like hint.apic.0.clock="0" instead. Is simply turning off the timer sufficient to use the deeper sleep states, or must all of the local apic be disabled? Some machines won't boot with hint.apic.0.disabled, so it would be useful to determine whether this is really necessary. Regards, b. _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: acpi(4) corrections, clarificationsb. f. wrote:
> While this documentation cleanup is going on, I'd like to point out > that acpi(4) could use some improvements: > > (1)In the "SYSCTL VARIABLES" section, under hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest, > acpi(4) states "To enable ACPI CPU idling control, > machdep.cpu_idle_hlt must be set to 1". However, apparently only the > pc98 port still uses this OID, while amd64, i386, etc., use something > like machdep.idle=hlt, so this remark should be changed. And in any > case, is this statement correct? Can't idling now be used with other > values of machdep.idle, like mwait, mwait_hlt, amdc1e, hlt, and acpi? > > (2)Under the "BUGS" section, acpi(4) states: > > "The acpi CPU idle power management drive conflicts with the local > APIC (LAPIC) timer. Disable APIC mode with hint.apic.0.disabled or do > not use the C2 and C3 states if APIC mode is enabled." > > However, mav@, in his recent series of recommendations on > power-saving, advocated the use of hints like hint.apic.0.clock="0" > instead. Is simply turning off the timer sufficient to use the deeper > sleep states, or must all of the local apic be disabled? Some > machines won't boot with hint.apic.0.disabled, so it would be useful > to determine whether this is really necessary. It is enough to disable APIC timer to use C2/C3. No need to disable whole APIC. There were some objections that legacy timers may not route their interrupts properly on some new systems, but I am not sure whether disabling whole APIC help them somehow, but SMP it kill definitely. -- Alexander Motin _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@..." |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |