|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
alternative to urlZipInstallerHi,
I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the documentation. see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue? Cheers Paul -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerOn Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:
> Hi, > > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the > documentation. > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer > > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue? > Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and change the installUrl? Alexander http://brill.no --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerHi Alexander,
my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources. Cheers Paul -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100 > Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...> > An: user@... > Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller > On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to > > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the > > documentation. > > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer > > > > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the > > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it > > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue? > > > > > Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and > change the installUrl? > > Alexander > http://brill.no > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerCant you just copy the artifacts into the place the installer installs
it? I have something similar and I have antrun execution that copies the stuff into installer location prior to the cargo:start. The install location is somewhere under target, not on the right machine at the moment so cant give you the specifics. Martin West skype:amartinwest On 13 Feb 2009, at 14:13, Paul Hammes wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web > host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources. > > Cheers > > Paul > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100 >> Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...> >> An: user@... >> Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller > >> On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to >>> install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the >>> documentation. >>> see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer >>> >>> I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the >>> VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it >>> from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue? >>> >> >> >> Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, >> and >> change the installUrl? >> >> Alexander >> http://brill.no >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> > > -- > Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit > allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerOn Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Paul Hammes wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web > host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources. what kind of repository is it? what type of file is it? etc... I don't know exactly what you are trying to do. > Cheers > > Paul > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100 > > Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...> > > An: user@... > > Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller > > > On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to > > > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the > > > documentation. > > > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer > > > > > > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the > > > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it > > > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue? > > > > > > > > > Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and > > change the installUrl? > > > > Alexander > > http://brill.no > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerOn Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Paul Hammes <Paul.Hammes@...> wrote:
> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources. I assume by 'repository' here you mean your source code repo, such as Subversion. Where is the file relative to your project code? Would file://${basedir}/path/to/file.zip work? There are other ways to load Tomcat though, including expecting it to be installed on the build machine and pointing at that local installation. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: alternative to urlZipInstallerOn Feb 13, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Matt Wringe wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Paul Hammes wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web >> host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources. Well, if you are running subversion you usually have http access to the artifacts in your repository. So you could probably add that zip file to the repo as a binary, and fetch it directly from http://svnhost/trunk/myproject/apache-tomcat-5.5.zip Alexander http://brill.no --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |