alternative to urlZipInstaller

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Paul Hammes :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the documentation.
see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer

I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?

Cheers

Paul
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Alexander Brill :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to  
> install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the  
> documentation.
> see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer
>
> I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the  
> VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it  
> from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?
>


Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and  
change the installUrl?

Alexander
http://brill.no

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Paul Hammes :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Alexander,

my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.

Cheers

Paul

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100
> Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...>
> An: user@...
> Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller

> On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to  
> > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the  
> > documentation.
> > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer
> >
> > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the  
> > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it  
> > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?
> >
>
>
> Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and  
> change the installUrl?
>
> Alexander
> http://brill.no
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>

--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by amartinwest :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Cant you just copy the artifacts into the place the installer installs  
it?

I have something similar and I have antrun execution that copies the  
stuff into installer location prior to the cargo:start. The install  
location is somewhere under target, not on the right machine at the  
moment so cant give you the specifics.

Martin West
skype:amartinwest

On 13 Feb 2009, at 14:13, Paul Hammes wrote:

> Hi Alexander,
>
> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web  
> host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100
>> Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...>
>> An: user@...
>> Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller
>
>> On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to
>>> install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the
>>> documentation.
>>> see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer
>>>
>>> I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the
>>> VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it
>>> from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host,  
>> and
>> change the installUrl?
>>
>> Alexander
>> http://brill.no
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>
> --
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit  
> allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Matt Wringe :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Paul Hammes wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web
> host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.

what kind of repository is it? what type of file is it? etc...
I don't know exactly what you are trying to do.

> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100
> > Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...>
> > An: user@...
> > Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller
>
> > On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to  
> > > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the  
> > > documentation.
> > > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer
> > >
> > > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the  
> > > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it  
> > > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and  
> > change the installUrl?
> >
> > Alexander
> > http://brill.no
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Wendy Smoak-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Paul Hammes <Paul.Hammes@...> wrote:

> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.

I assume by 'repository' here you mean your source code repo, such as
Subversion.

Where is the file relative to your project code?  Would
file://${basedir}/path/to/file.zip work?

There are other ways to load Tomcat though, including expecting it to
be installed on the build machine and pointing at that local
installation.

--
Wendy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Alexander Brill :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Feb 13, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Matt Wringe wrote:

>
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Paul Hammes wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web
>> host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.



Well, if you are running subversion you usually have http access to  
the artifacts in your repository. So you could probably add that zip  
file to the repo as a binary, and fetch it directly from http://svnhost/trunk/myproject/apache-tomcat-5.5.zip


Alexander
http://brill.no


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email