arm port patch
|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
arm port patch
by marius adrian popa
::
Rate this Message:
i have seen this patch for arm/debian
maybe it should be added to the main tree (or at least add the new id) http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-firebird/2.1.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/port-arm.patch;h=2e161ba5155e0f43d34fc199b68db8dfa5ddab74;hb=HEAD Also we should discuss the next id's for these architectures http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=firebird2.0 -- developer flamerobin.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by Alex Peshkov-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Friday 04 April 2008 18:31, marius popa wrote:
> i have seen this patch for arm/debian > maybe it should be added to the main tree (or at least add the new id) > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-firebird/2.1.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/port- >arm.patch;h=2e161ba5155e0f43d34fc199b68db8dfa5ddab74;hb=HEAD I've been in contact with a guy who was making a port. For that moment lock manager on ARM did not work correctly - it was randomly failing (races ???). I have never received any message stating that this was fixed. As long as people need single-user access, firebird on arm works for them. May be it's even OK for cellular phones (as far as I know, ARM9 is used in them). But I'm not sure, should we add such ports to main tree or not. If someone can confirm firebird working on ARM correctly, I have no problems adding that port. > Also we should discuss the next id's for these architectures > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=firebird2.0 I think we should better think about changing the whole idea of CLASS_FREEBSD_AMD64 naming schema. We must have separate entry for operating system and separate - for HW architecture. This will greatly decrease number of required manually supported classes. This may be done in ODS12. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by Alan Barclay
::
Rate this Message:
Alex Peshkov wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2008 18:31, marius popa wrote: >> i have seen this patch for arm/debian >> maybe it should be added to the main tree (or at least add the new id) >> >> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-firebird/2.1.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/port- >> arm.patch;h=2e161ba5155e0f43d34fc199b68db8dfa5ddab74;hb=HEAD > > I've been in contact with a guy who was making a port. For that moment lock > manager on ARM did not work correctly - it was randomly failing (races ???). > I have never received any message stating that this was fixed. As long as > people need single-user access, firebird on arm works for them. May be it's > even OK for cellular phones (as far as I know, ARM9 is used in them). But I'm > not sure, should we add such ports to main tree or not. > > If someone can confirm firebird working on ARM correctly, I have no problems > adding that port. Hi, It was I who spent time last Spring/Summer working on this. And I would very much like to see the current efforts (in particular, the CLASS_xxx) incorporated into the main tree. After playing with various GCC versions / options, the lock manager did appear to function (without locking up). Although I did not create a HUGE load ... so it is possible that there is still a some hidden problem. I am already in the process of buying another Buffalo LinkStation (running Debian Etch 'FreeLink') and will begin working with Firebird again very soon. Best Regards, Alan. >> Also we should discuss the next id's for these architectures >> http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=firebird2.0 > > I think we should better think about changing the whole idea of > CLASS_FREEBSD_AMD64 naming schema. We must have separate entry for operating > system and separate - for HW architecture. This will greatly decrease number > of required manually supported classes. This may be done in ODS12. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by Paul Reeves-2
::
Rate this Message:
On Friday 04 April 2008, Alex Peshkov wrote:
> But I'm not sure, should we add such ports to main tree or not. > > If someone can confirm firebird working on ARM correctly, I have no > problems adding that port. > I think the best way to solve any problems with the port would be to commit the patch. There are a many different posix ARM implementations out there and it would be a easier for developers to collaborate if there was some code in CVS. Paul -- Paul Reeves http://www.ibphoenix.com Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by Alex Peshkov-3
::
Rate this Message:
On Monday 07 April 2008 16:49, Paul Reeves wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2008, Alex Peshkov wrote: > > But I'm not sure, should we add such ports to main tree or not. > > > > If someone can confirm firebird working on ARM correctly, I have no > > problems adding that port. > > I think the best way to solve any problems with the port would be to commit > the patch. There are a many different posix ARM implementations out there > and it would be a easier for developers to collaborate if there was some > code in CVS. I'm waiting for a tree to be tagged - not to add more problems to Dmitry. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by marius adrian popa
::
Rate this Message:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Paul Reeves <preeves@...> wrote:
Yes arm is the main cpu used in phones and embedded area http://www.linuxdevices.com/files/article077/embedded_processor_current_trend.jpg So with the arm port we will have top 4 cpu used in linux embedded
-- developer flamerobin.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
|
|
Re: arm port patch
by Alan Barclay
::
Rate this Message:
Hi All,
I would very much appreciate if these files could be added to the main tree. (Then I would continue to develop them.) When I checked out the CVS firebird2 module today, they weren't yet present. Thanks and Regards, Alan. marius popa wrote: > i have seen this patch for arm/debian > maybe it should be added to the main tree (or at least add the new id) > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-firebird/2.1.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/port-arm.patch;h=2e161ba5155e0f43d34fc199b68db8dfa5ddab74;hb=HEAD > > Also we should discuss the next id's for these architectures > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=firebird2.0 > > -- > developer flamerobin.org <http://flamerobin.org> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
