Hi,
Suppose you have the following schema:
<xs:complexType name="XB">
<xs:attribute name="a1" type="xs:int"/>
<xs:attribute name="a2" type="xs:int" default="2"/>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="X1">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:restriction base="XB">
<xs:attribute name="a1" type="xs:int" default="11"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="X2">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:restriction base="XB">
<xs:attribute name="a1" type="xs:int" default="21"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
You get the following generated code
public class XB {
@XmlAttribute
protected Integer a1;
@XmlAttribute
protected Integer a2;
public Integer getA1() {
return a1;
}
...
public int getA2() {
if (a2 == null) {
return 2;
} else {
return a2;
}
}
...
}
public class X1
extends XB
{
}
public class X2
extends XB
{
}
Why are attributes not generated in the subclasses? Is this a bug? It
seems like a fairly trivial thing to do (without knowing anything
about the implementation).
Cheers,
Anders
--
Anders Hessellund
www.itu.dk/people/hessellund/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
