|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
best practice for a protocol mechanism?Hi,
I currently have an Catalyst application with several controllers and even more actions. Some of those actions require that I call my protocol action that - surprise, surprise - does some protocol work. This action is located in the Root controller. Right now I accomplish this with code snippets like this: package MyApp::Controller::Foo ... sub some_action :Local { ... $c->forward("MyApp::Controller::Root","myProtocolAction",["some message that should be protocolled"]); ... } Is there some neater way to do this? (I started reading into the "Chains" topic but do not know if this protocolling mechanismn would be the right use case for chaining.) Any ideas? Thanks. Jens -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Jens Schwarz<blacky6767@...> wrote:
> Hi, > > I currently have an Catalyst application with several controllers and even more actions. Some of those actions require that I call my protocol action that - surprise, surprise - does some protocol work. This action is located in the Root controller. Right now I accomplish this with code snippets like this: > > package MyApp::Controller::Foo > ... > sub some_action :Local { > ... > $c->forward("MyApp::Controller::Root","myProtocolAction",["some message that should be protocolled"]); > ... > } > > Is there some neater way to do this? (I started reading into the "Chains" topic but do not know if this protocolling mechanismn would be the right use case for chaining.) I am not entirely sure that I understand what you mean by protocol action - but how about a plain old method call: MyApp::Controller::Root->myProtocolAction( $c, "some message that should be protocolled" ); -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> I am not entirely sure that I understand what you mean by protocol > action - but how about a plain old method call: > > MyApp::Controller::Root->myProtocolAction( $c, "some message that > should be protocolled" ); I think Jens is talking about logging (German: "protokollieren"). But without further detail from his side it's hard to give good advice, I think. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?On 9 Sep 2009, at 21:35, Bernhard Graf wrote: > Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > >> I am not entirely sure that I understand what you mean by protocol >> action - but how about a plain old method call: >> >> MyApp::Controller::Root->myProtocolAction( $c, "some message that >> should be protocolled" ); > > I think Jens is talking about logging (German: "protokollieren"). I'm guesstimating that he means 'I end up with this template code at the end of loads of my actions, which forwards somewhere with various params'... Which I'd guess _could maybe_ be accomplished in a neater way with an ActionRole which said 'after execute => sub {..etc..' > But without further detail from his side it's hard to give good > advice, > I think. You said it, the above is pure speculation :) Cheers t0m _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?Oh, *err* right. I meant 'logging' and not 'protocol' *douh*.
Well, right now I have a proto^Wlogging action in my Root controller that I call everytime I want something to be logged in my DB. P.ex.: package MyApp::Controller::Book; (...) sub create ... { ... $c->forward("MyApp::Controller::Root","myLoggingAction",["some message that should be logged"]); } In addition to this, I have a logging controller, that simply displays the list of logged messages from the DB. Think of something like: | Timestamp | User | Action | +------------------+--------+------------------+ | 2009-09-10 10:30 | foobar | created new book | So the question is: Is there a neater way of doing this? Some kind of best practice? -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:41:29 +0100 > Von: Tomas Doran <bobtfish@...> > An: The elegant MVC web framework <catalyst@...> > Betreff: Re: [Catalyst] best practice for a protocol mechanism? > I'm guesstimating that he means 'I end up with this template code at > the end of loads of my actions, which forwards somewhere with various > params'... Now *I* am not entirely sure that I understand what you mean by this. :) Jens -- Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Jens Schwarz <blacky6767@...> wrote:
Oh, *err* right. I meant 'logging' and not 'protocol' *douh*. Hi Jens, I would do one of two things. The first is to build a custom Catalyst::Log class if that is what you are looking for, or you could even just use Catalyst::Log::Log4perl and configure it as necessary. (Using Catalyst::Log::Log4perl is what I would use). Then, simply use $c->log->whatever. The other option is to create a model for this, and change the code to: $c->model('Logger')->log("Message"); If you use the model approach, you can use Catalyst::Component::ACCEPT_CONTEXT to access $c->model('Schema') and $c->user. -J _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:24 AM, J. Shirley <jshirley@...> wrote:
Err, Catalyst::Component::InstancePerContext is the right one. Don't mind me, I'm still thinking it is 2004. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
|
|
Re: best practice for a protocol mechanism?Sounds to me like an audit log which should be done by the model
regardless of where the model is used (e.g. Catalyst app, perl script run by cron, ...). That's the module you want imho: http://search.cpan.org/~nuffin/DBIx-Class-Journal-0.900001_02/lib/DBIx/Class/Journal.pm Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 14:43 +0200 schrieb Jens Schwarz: > Oh, *err* right. I meant 'logging' and not 'protocol' *douh*. > > Well, right now I have a proto^Wlogging action in my Root controller that I call everytime I want something to be logged in my DB. > P.ex.: > > package MyApp::Controller::Book; > (...) > sub create ... { > ... > $c->forward("MyApp::Controller::Root","myLoggingAction",["some message that should be logged"]); > } > > In addition to this, I have a logging controller, that simply displays the list of logged messages from the DB. > > Think of something like: > > | Timestamp | User | Action | > +------------------+--------+------------------+ > | 2009-09-10 10:30 | foobar | created new book | > > So the question is: Is there a neater way of doing this? Some kind of best practice? > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:41:29 +0100 > > Von: Tomas Doran <bobtfish@...> > > An: The elegant MVC web framework <catalyst@...> > > Betreff: Re: [Catalyst] best practice for a protocol mechanism? > > > I'm guesstimating that he means 'I end up with this template code at > > the end of loads of my actions, which forwards somewhere with various > > params'... > > Now *I* am not entirely sure that I understand what you mean by this. :) > > Jens > LG Alex *"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"* T-Systems Austria GesmbH Rennweg 97-99, 1030 Wien Handelsgericht Wien, FN 79340b *"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"* Notice: This e-mail contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete this e-mail immediately. *"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"*"* _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@... Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@.../ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |