|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
bjam - no strip optionHi, If I build a release version on linux using gcc, the symbols
are all stripped out because it uses the ‘--strip-all’ linker
option. Is there a way to disable this option? If so, how to do it? Thanks a lot, Anant _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionAnant Rao wrote:
> If I build a release version on linux using gcc, the symbols are all stripped out because it uses the '--strip-all' linker option. > Is there a way to disable this option? If so, how to do it? Try setting the debug-symbol feature to on. So in your Jamroot: project : requirements <debug-symbols>on ; -- Anthony Foglia Princeton Consultants (609) 987-8787 x233 _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionOn Thursday 22 October 2009 Anthony Foglia wrote:
> Anant Rao wrote: > > If I build a release version on linux using gcc, the symbols are all stripped out because it uses the '--strip-all' linker option. > > Is there a way to disable this option? If so, how to do it? > > Try setting the debug-symbol feature to on. So in your Jamroot: > > project > : requirements > <debug-symbols>on > ; That will actually add a pile of debug information. It probably is a better idea to avoid --strip-all, since it's rarely done by other projects, even in release configuration. Comments? - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionVladimir Prus <ghost <at> cs.msu.su> writes:
> > It probably is a better idea > to avoid --strip-all, since it's rarely done by other projects, even in release > configuration. Comments? > I am just encountering this issue. Does Boost Build v2 have an existing means for turning "strip symbols" on or off? If not, could this be added? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionDeane Yang wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost <at> cs.msu.su> writes: > >> It probably is a better idea >> to avoid --strip-all, since it's rarely done by other projects, even in release >> configuration. Comments? >> > > I am just encountering this issue. Does Boost Build v2 have an existing means > for turning "strip symbols" on or off? If not, could this be added? Do you mean something other than <debug-symbols>off vs. <debug-symbols>on? -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionOn Wednesday 11 November 2009 Rene Rivera wrote:
> Deane Yang wrote: > > Vladimir Prus <ghost <at> cs.msu.su> writes: > > > >> It probably is a better idea > >> to avoid --strip-all, since it's rarely done by other projects, even in release > >> configuration. Comments? > >> > > > > I am just encountering this issue. Does Boost Build v2 have an existing means > > for turning "strip symbols" on or off? If not, could this be added? > > Do you mean something other than <debug-symbols>off vs. <debug-symbols>on? I guess so. Note that other build system do not do complete strip in release configuration. It's probably right, as it allows to get at least minimally useful backtraces. So, I would propose to: - don't strip by default - [possibly] introduce a feature to request stripping What do you think? - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionVladimir Prus wrote:
> So, I would propose to: > > - don't strip by default > - [possibly] introduce a feature to request stripping > > What do you think? > I support this 100%. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
|
|
Re: bjam - no strip optionHI Volodya,
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, you wrote: > So, I would propose to: > > - don't strip by default > - [possibly] introduce a feature to request stripping > > What do you think? +10 from my side, too. Yours, Jürgen -- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold@... ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke ! _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |