|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6Hi all,
I just got around to trying 2.3.11 on 10.6, like so: export CC=/Developer/usr/bin/clang export CXX=/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 export CFLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -arch i386" export CXXFLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -arch i386" There are many messages like this: ld: warning: in /Users/sean/Downloads/freetype-2.3.11/objs/.libs/ ftsystem.o, file is not of required architecture If I instead use -arch x86_64 those warnings do not appear. I suspect that something is assuming architectures or something is not passing my arch flag to something else. Note that on 10.5 the compiler defaults to i386 (32 bit) but on 10.6 it defaults to x86_64 (64 bit). Other than that, there is only one compiler warning: /Users/sean/Downloads/freetype-2.3.11/src/tools/apinames.c:268:39: warning: field precision should have type 'int', but argument has type 'long' [-Wformat] fprintf( stderr, ">>> %.*s\n", p-name, name ); ^ ~~~~~~ This surprised me, but the 'printf' man page does say that '*' expects an int. It doesn't seem likely that p-name would overflow an int, so I guess a cast would be ok. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6> [...], there is only one compiler warning:
> > /Users/sean/Downloads/freetype-2.3.11/src/tools/apinames.c:268:39: > warning: field precision should have type 'int', but argument has type 'long' > [-Wformat] > fprintf( stderr, ">>> %.*s\n", p-name, name ); > ^ ~~~~~~ > This surprised me, but the 'printf' man page does say that '*' > expects an int. It doesn't seem likely that p-name would overflow > an int, so I guess a cast would be ok. Fixed in git, thanks. Please test. Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6On 11/4/09 12:19 PM, Werner LEMBERG said:
>> [...], there is only one compiler warning: >> >> /Users/sean/Downloads/freetype-2.3.11/src/tools/apinames.c:268:39: >> warning: field precision should have type 'int', but argument has type >'long' >> [-Wformat] >> fprintf( stderr, ">>> %.*s\n", p-name, name ); >> ^ ~~~~~~ >> This surprised me, but the 'printf' man page does say that '*' >> expects an int. It doesn't seem likely that p-name would overflow >> an int, so I guess a cast would be ok. > >Fixed in git, thanks. Please test. Thanks. Did you also fix the "file is not of required architecture" message? This is the more important one really. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6> Did you also fix the "file is not of required architecture" message?
> This is the more important one really. No. Honestly, I don't think that this is a bug, but this is an educated guess only since I've never worked with a Mac. I rather believe this is a problem with the `configure' script, passing wrong or missing arguments to select the proper architecture. Maybe it is sufficient to use a recent development versions of `libtool', for example. Suzuki-san, can you comment? Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6On 11/4/09 3:44 PM, Werner LEMBERG said:
>> Did you also fix the "file is not of required architecture" message? >> This is the more important one really. > >No. Honestly, I don't think that this is a bug, but this is an >educated guess only since I've never worked with a Mac. I rather >believe this is a problem with the `configure' script, passing wrong >or missing arguments to select the proper architecture. I agree it is probably an issue with the 'configure' script. Alas, I know nothing about 'configure' scripts. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6Hi,
I'm sorry, yet I have no access to Mac OS X 10.6 machines and I could not reproduce the trouble at once. Could you send me config.log, config.status, and the messages you got in building (something like a file logged by "make 2>&1 | tee make.log" )? Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6On 11/5/09 10:26 AM, mpsuzuki@... said:
>I'm sorry, yet I have no access to Mac OS X 10.6 machines >and I could not reproduce the trouble at once. > >Could you send me config.log, config.status, and the messages >you got in building (something like a file logged by >"make 2>&1 | tee make.log" )? Attached are the 3 files you requested. Please let me know if I can help further. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6Hi,
Thank you for helpful information. I will propose improved configure script in next week... Regards, mpsuzuki On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:16:03 +1300 Rowan Wookey <admin@...> wrote: > >Try adding the arch flag to LDFLAGS that worked for me. > >~Rowan > > >_______________________________________________ >Freetype-devel mailing list >Freetype-devel@... >http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6Hi,
Sorry for my lated homework. Attached is a proposal of patch for Mac OS X 10.6. The patch itself is not easy to read. The patched script would be like following. It scans all token in CFLAGS, lookup -isysroot, -arch, -m32 and -m64. If they are not included in LDFLAGS (for -isysroot and -arch, arguments are also checked), they are copied to LDFLAGS. # Some options handling SDKs/archs in CFLAGS should be copied # to LDFLAGS. Apple TechNote 2137 recommends to include these # options in CFLAGS but not in LDFLAGS. set dummy ${CFLAGS} i=1 while test $i -lt $# do c=$1 case "${c}" in -isysroot|-arch) # options taking 1 argument a=$2 AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share ${c} ${a}]) if expr " ${LDFLAGS} " : ".* ${c} *${a}.*" > /dev/null then AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) else AC_MSG_RESULT([no, copy to LDFLAGS]) LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} ${c} ${a}" fi shift 1 ;; -m32|-m64) # options taking no argument AC_MSG_RESULT([whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share ${c}]) if expr " ${LDFLAGS} " : ".* ${c} *${a}.*" > /dev/null then AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) else AC_MSG_RESULT([no, copy to LDFLAGS]) LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} ${c}" fi ;; # *) # AC_MSG_RESULT([${c} is not copied to LDFLAGS]) # ;; esac shift 1 done At present, I didn't restrict this hook to specific system. If it's better to restrict this hook to Mac OS X, please let me know. I'm not sure if there is special requirement to use different "-arch XXX" or "-m32/-m64" options between CFLAGS & LDFLAGS. Sean, could you review the patch? Yet I don't have access to Mac OS X 10.6 machines, so I cannot check if this patch solves the problem you reported. Regards, mpsuzuki diff --git a/builds/unix/configure.raw b/builds/unix/configure.raw index 8a99988..4ecd619 100644 --- a/builds/unix/configure.raw +++ b/builds/unix/configure.raw @@ -230,30 +230,48 @@ if test x$with_zlib != xno && test -n "$LIBZ"; then fi -# check Apple's `-isysroot' option and duplicate it to LDFLAGS if required -- -# Apple TechNote 2137 recommends to include it in CFLAGS but not in LDFLAGS - -AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether CFLAGS includes -isysroot option]) -case "$CFLAGS" in -*sysroot* ) - AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) - AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether LDFLAGS includes -isysroot option]) - case "$LDFLAGS" in - *sysroot* ) - AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) +# Some options handling SDKs/archs in CFLAGS should be copied +# to LDFLAGS. Apple TechNote 2137 recommends to include these +# options in CFLAGS but not in LDFLAGS. + +save_config_args=$* +set dummy ${CFLAGS} +i=1 +while test $i -lt $# +do + c=$1 + + case "${c}" in + -isysroot|-arch) # options taking 1 argument + a=$2 + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share ${c} ${a}]) + if expr " ${LDFLAGS} " : ".* ${c} *${a}.*" > /dev/null + then + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) + else + AC_MSG_RESULT([no, copy to LDFLAGS]) + LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} ${c} ${a}" + fi + shift 1 ;; - *) - AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) - isysroot_dir=`echo ${CFLAGS} | tr '\t' ' ' | sed 's/^.*-isysroot *//;s/ .*//'` - AC_MSG_WARN(-isysroot ${isysroot_dir} is added to LDFLAGS) - LDFLAGS="-isysroot ${isysroot_dir} ${LDFLAGS}" + -m32|-m64) # options taking no argument + AC_MSG_RESULT([whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share ${c}]) + if expr " ${LDFLAGS} " : ".* ${c} *${a}.*" > /dev/null + then + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) + else + AC_MSG_RESULT([no, copy to LDFLAGS]) + LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} ${c}" + fi ;; + # *) + # AC_MSG_RESULT([${c} is not copied to LDFLAGS]) + # ;; esac - ;; -*) - AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) - ;; -esac + + shift 1 +done +set ${save_config_args} # Whether to use Mac OS resource-based fonts. _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6> Attached is a proposal of patch for Mac OS X 10.6.
If you think this is the right way to go please commit. Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6On 11/18/09 7:00 PM, mpsuzuki@... said:
>I'm not sure if there is special >requirement to use different "-arch XXX" or "-m32/-m64" >options between CFLAGS & LDFLAGS. > >Sean, could you review the patch? Yet I don't have access >to Mac OS X 10.6 machines, so I cannot check if this patch >solves the problem you reported. Sorry for the delayed reply. I don't know anything about autoconf/automake or even shell script, so I'm not too sure. :( But I do know that -m32 and -m64 are not used on OS X. It's really just -arch that controls that. Thanks, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6I can confirm this works.
I configured as if building for OS X 10.5 as 32 bit, on OS X 10.6 with the default compiler setting at 64 bit. Here is the new output in the configure script checking whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share -arch i386... no, copy to LDFLAGS checking whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk... no, copy to LDFLAGS A few notes 1) I had to edit autogen.sh to allow autoconf 2.61 and aclocal 1.10 which are the versions supplied with OS X 10.6 2) The patch looks like it has been word wrapped on line 47 to have " .*//'`" (without quotes) just move this up to line 46 preserving the space at the beginning so line 46 should be: - isysroot_dir=`echo ${CFLAGS} | tr '\t' ' ' | sed 's/^.*-isysroot *//;s/ .*//'` 3)My CFLAGS were set to CFLAGS="-arch i386 -pipe -Os -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.5" 4) file libfreetype.6.dylib outputs : "libfreetype.6.dylib: Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386" which is correct. 5) I used the latest development version from git. Regards Rowan On 26 Nov 2009, at 13:26, Sean McBride wrote: > On 11/18/09 7:00 PM, mpsuzuki@... said: > >> I'm not sure if there is special >> requirement to use different "-arch XXX" or "-m32/-m64" >> options between CFLAGS & LDFLAGS. >> >> Sean, could you review the patch? Yet I don't have access >> to Mac OS X 10.6 machines, so I cannot check if this patch >> solves the problem you reported. > > Sorry for the delayed reply. > > I don't know anything about autoconf/automake or even shell script, so > I'm not too sure. :( > > But I do know that -m32 and -m64 are not used on OS X. It's really just > -arch that controls that. > > Thanks, > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Sean McBride, B. Eng sean@... > Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com > Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada > > _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6Dear Rowan,
Great Thank you for spending time to confirm! On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:04:26 +1300 Rowan Wookey <admin@...> wrote: >Here is the new output in the configure script > >checking whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share -arch i386... no, copy to LDFLAGS >checking whether CFLAGS and LDFLAGS share -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk... no, copy to LDFLAGS Good, it's what I designed. >2) The patch looks like it has been word wrapped on line 47 to have " .*//'`" (without quotes) just move this up to line 46 preserving the space at the beginning so line 46 should be: >- isysroot_dir=`echo ${CFLAGS} | tr '\t' ' ' | sed 's/^.*-isysroot *//;s/ .*//'` Oops, I should not put the patch in the text which can be folded by some MUA. I'm sorry for troubling you. Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
|
|
Re: building freetype 2.3.11 on Mac OS X 10.6On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:26:05 -0500
"Sean McBride" <sean@...> wrote: >On 11/18/09 7:00 PM, mpsuzuki@... said: >>Sean, could you review the patch? Yet I don't have access >>to Mac OS X 10.6 machines, so I cannot check if this patch >>solves the problem you reported. >I don't know anything about autoconf/automake or even shell script, so >I'm not too sure. :( Oh, I'm sorry. I uploaded a tarball with improved configure at http://home.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/mpsuzuki/freetype2-20091126_macslfix.tar.gz * it digs "freetype2" directory. please be careful not * to overwrite your existing "freetype2" directory. Please test it. Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |