bundled openssl version

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

bundled openssl version

by Volodymyr Kostyrko :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient.
Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working?

--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

RE: bundled openssl version

by Jérôme Le Gal :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

Why don't you use security/openssl ?

-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-freebsd-security@...
[mailto:owner-freebsd-security@...] De la part de Volodymyr Kostyrko
Envoyé : jeudi 27 août 2009 13:52
À : freebsd-security@...
Objet : bundled openssl version

I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient.
Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working?

--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

Re: bundled openssl version

by Zahemszky Gábor :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

>> I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient.
>> Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working?

> Why don't you use security/openssl ?

Why do we need a port, if we can / could use the program from the base
system?

Zahy < Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU >

--
#!/bin/ksh
Z='21N16I25C25E30, 40M30E33E25T15U!';
IFS=' ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ ';
set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = ? ]]&&print $i&&break;
[[ $i = ??? ]]&&j=$i&&i=${i%?};
typeset -i40 i=8#$i;print -n ${i#???};
[[ "$j" = ??? ]]&&print -n "${j#??} "&&j=;typeset +i i;};
IFS=' 0123456789 ';set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = , ]]&&i=2;
[[ $i = ?? ]]||typeset -l i;j="$j $i";typeset +l i;};print "$j"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

Re: bundled openssl version

by István-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

custom flags -O666 and so on:)

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Zahemszky Gábor <Gabor@...> wrote:

> >> I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient.
> >> Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working?
>
> > Why don't you use security/openssl ?
>
> Why do we need a port, if we can / could use the program from the base
> system?
>
> Zahy < Gabor at Zahemszky dot HU >
>
> --
> #!/bin/ksh
> Z='21N16I25C25E30, 40M30E33E25T15U!';
> IFS=' ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ ';
> set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = ? ]]&&print $i&&break;
> [[ $i = ??? ]]&&j=$i&&i=${i%?};
> typeset -i40 i=8#$i;print -n ${i#???};
> [[ "$j" = ??? ]]&&print -n "${j#??} "&&j=;typeset +i i;};
> IFS=' 0123456789 ';set -- $Z;for i;{ [[ $i = , ]]&&i=2;
> [[ $i = ?? ]]||typeset -l i;j="$j $i";typeset +l i;};print "$j"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@... mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@...
> "
>



--
the sun shines for all
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

Re: bundled openssl version

by Simon L. Nielsen :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 2009.08.27 19:29:46 +0200, Zahemszky G?bor wrote:
> >> I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient.
> >> Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working?
>
> > Why don't you use security/openssl ?
>
> Why do we need a port, if we can / could use the program from the base
> system?

Well, 0.9.8f is also rather ancient :-).

Anyway:

[simon@frankie:~] openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009
[simon@frankie:~] uname -a
FreeBSD frankie.nitro.dk 8.0-RC1 FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 #0: Thu Sep 17 20:45:19 UTC 2009     root@...:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

I also hope to MFC it to 7-stable, but I need to check that the ABI
and ABI is compatible first...

--
Simon L. Nielsen
Hat: OpenSSL janitor
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."