calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

View: New views
17 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Markus Spring :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I don't know if I can trust my memory (the biological one), but I *think* that
it *was* possible to call lightzone together with the file-to-open from the
commandline.

Is this still possible with 2.4, and if yes, how?

Regards - Markus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+qBPxxUzQSse11ARAqfVAJ0WkbzM87CEUf5s1YqxqUiMsH/O3ACffS1c
Fh81HkBsNNkVC4Gu6g5CUT8=
=+V0t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Parent Message unknown Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by danbowman :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Markus,

I took a look through the mailing list archives; the only mention I could find on this topic was a 'wish list' request (in response to 2.4's release) for this feature to be placed back into the next version. Evidently it was removed in the transition from 2.1 to 2.4. Not that you'd want to necessarily revert, but 2.1 is still listed as available in the Lightroom for Linux page at Lightcrafts (http://www-old.lightcrafts.com/linux/).

The Windows version of 3.0 does have this ability (inferred, since I can call Lightzone from within Lightroom to edit a file); perhaps we'll see it return when/if 3.0 for Linux is ported.

dan

-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Markus Spring <m.spring@...>

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if I can trust my memory (the biological one), but I *think* that
> it *was* possible to call lightzone together with the file-to-open from the
> commandline.
>
> Is this still possible with 2.4, and if yes, how?
>
> Regards - Markus
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFG+qBPxxUzQSse11ARAqfVAJ0WkbzM87CEUf5s1YqxqUiMsH/O3ACffS1c
> Fh81HkBsNNkVC4Gu6g5CUT8=
> =+V0t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone


_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by bablokb :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I investigated the Java-bytecode, and I concluded that it is not possible. But
maybe there is more than one entry-point into Lightzone, since calling
Lightzone from other applications always was a feature of at least the
windows version.

There is a possible hack: write a wrapper-script that edits
~/.java/.userPrefs/com/lightcrafts/app/prefs.xml. Here you could set the
value for "RecentFile0". After startup, you can select your file directly
from the recent-file list. Of course, passing a file on the commandline would
be better, but I think that's the best you could do.

BTW: setting "RecentFolder0" works fine...

The hack should look something like this:

+++ cut +++
#!/bin/bash

PREF_FILE="$HOME/.java/.userPrefs/com/lightcrafts/app/prefs.xml"
mv "$PREF_FILE" "$PREF_FILE.bak"

sed -e "/RecentFile0/value=\"[^\"]*\"/value=\"$1\"" \
  "$PREF_FILE.bak" > "$PREF_FILE"
path-to-lightzone

+++ cut +++

With a little more effort, one could rotate the recent-file list (the solution
above effectively deletes your most-recent file).

Bernhard

> Markus,
>
> I took a look through the mailing list archives; the only mention I could
> find on this topic was a 'wish list' request (in response to 2.4's release)
> for this feature to be placed back into the next version. Evidently it was
> removed in the transition from 2.1 to 2.4. Not that you'd want to
> necessarily revert, but 2.1 is still listed as available in the Lightroom
> for Linux page at Lightcrafts (http://www-old.lightcrafts.com/linux/).
>
> The Windows version of 3.0 does have this ability (inferred, since I can
> call Lightzone from within Lightroom to edit a file); perhaps we'll see it
> return when/if 3.0 for Linux is ported.
>
> dan
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Markus Spring <m.spring@...>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know if I can trust my memory (the biological one), but I *think*
> > that it *was* possible to call lightzone together with the file-to-open
> > from the commandline.
> >
> > Is this still possible with 2.4, and if yes, how?
> >
> > Regards - Markus
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFG+qBPxxUzQSse11ARAqfVAJ0WkbzM87CEUf5s1YqxqUiMsH/O3ACffS1c
> > Fh81HkBsNNkVC4Gu6g5CUT8=
> > =+V0t
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > LightZone mailing list
> > LightZone@...
> > http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by SoftRomu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

LZ on Linux is not maintained anymore.

This has been officially announcedby Lightcrafts on their forum. LZ4Linux
for an initiative of Anton Kast who has recently left the company.

So now, 2 solutions:
- stay with the 2.4
- change to another raw processor.


----- Original Message -----
From: <danbowman@...>
To: <lightzone@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Lightzone] calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline


> Markus,
>
> I took a look through the mailing list archives; the only mention I could
> find on this topic was a 'wish list' request (in response to 2.4's
> release) for this feature to be placed back into the next version.
> Evidently it was removed in the transition from 2.1 to 2.4. Not that you'd
> want to necessarily revert, but 2.1 is still listed as available in the
> Lightroom for Linux page at Lightcrafts
> (http://www-old.lightcrafts.com/linux/).
>
> The Windows version of 3.0 does have this ability (inferred, since I can
> call Lightzone from within Lightroom to edit a file); perhaps we'll see it
> return when/if 3.0 for Linux is ported.
>
> dan
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Markus Spring <m.spring@...>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if I can trust my memory (the biological one), but I *think*
>> that
>> it *was* possible to call lightzone together with the file-to-open from
>> the
>> commandline.
>>
>> Is this still possible with 2.4, and if yes, how?
>>
>> Regards - Markus
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFG+qBPxxUzQSse11ARAqfVAJ0WkbzM87CEUf5s1YqxqUiMsH/O3ACffS1c
>> Fh81HkBsNNkVC4Gu6g5CUT8=
>> =+V0t
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> LightZone mailing list
>> LightZone@...
>> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>

_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Markus Spring :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bernhard Bablok schrieb:
> There is a possible hack: write a wrapper-script that edits
Bernhard - thanks for the solution. This looks viable and the handling will be
much faster than selecting again on image out of probably several hundred...

Worst thing is what SoftRomu announced in his followup - that the company
dropped linux support completely.
I will probably stay with it until I switch my camera which will be unsupported
in its raw format by then - the only solution could be to exchange lightzones
dcraw, that might be worth some exploration.

Sad news...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+2OSxxUzQSse11ARAmWbAJ9vinTZIgP99c8lhiDuBhBoha314QCaA2n0
gS/PPQ4f820fJXL5HEJdIIc=
=ulFe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Bugzilla from risto@kurppa.fi :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2007/9/27, SoftRomu <softromu@...>:
> LZ on Linux is not maintained anymore.
>
> This has been officially announcedby Lightcrafts on their forum. LZ4Linux
> for an initiative of Anton Kast who has recently left the company.

Can you post a link to the thread where this is announced.. I suppose
people could send Light Crafts some e-mail to thank for LZ..



r
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by SoftRomu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Here is the thread I created to get a real statement from Lightcrafts and to
evaluate how many people are ready to pay for a real LZ for Linux version:

http://www.lightcrafts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=477

The answer has taken 4 month to come, the behaviour of Lighcrafts regarding
Linux users is strange and miss some respect.

For me, the key feature of Lighzone is "regions", more than the tone mapper
which is simply a different way to process curves. "Regions" are on the
roadmap of an another well know raw processor for Linux, but no date is
currently available. So stay tuned.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Risto H. Kurppa" <risto@...>
To: "SoftRomu" <softromu@...>
Cc: <danbowman@...>; <lightzone@...>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Lightzone] calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline


> 2007/9/27, SoftRomu <softromu@...>:
>> LZ on Linux is not maintained anymore.
>>
>> This has been officially announcedby Lightcrafts on their forum. LZ4Linux
>> for an initiative of Anton Kast who has recently left the company.
>
> Can you post a link to the thread where this is announced.. I suppose
> people could send Light Crafts some e-mail to thank for LZ..
>
>
>
> r
>

_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by bablokb :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> Worst thing is what SoftRomu announced in his followup - that the company
> dropped linux support completely.
> I will probably stay with it until I switch my camera which will be
> unsupported in its raw format by then - the only solution could be to
> exchange lightzones dcraw, that might be worth some exploration.
>
> Sad news...

Fortunately, there are free alternatives. I'm using ufraw/gimp in parallel
with Lightzone, since ufraw somtimes gives better results. Another nice
alternative is digikam/showfoto (showfoto is the stand-alone editor of
digikam - useful if you do not want to use the archiving features of
digikam). Showfoto has 16-bit support, also uses dcraw, and focusses on the
needs of photographers. It lacks the nice feature of non-destructive editing
and the small size of the lzn-files (and templates, ...), but it is a fine
tool for day-to-day work.

Bernhard
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Michael Singer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


bablokb wrote:
> Worst thing is what SoftRomu announced in his followup - that the company
> dropped linux support completely.
> I will probably stay with it until I switch my camera which will be
> unsupported in its raw format by then - the only solution could be to
> exchange lightzones dcraw, that might be worth some exploration.
>
> Sad news...

Fortunately, there are free alternatives. I'm using ufraw/gimp in parallel
with Lightzone, since ufraw somtimes gives better results. Another nice
alternative is digikam/showfoto (showfoto is the stand-alone editor of
digikam - useful if you do not want to use the archiving features of
digikam). Showfoto has 16-bit support, also uses dcraw, and focusses on the
needs of photographers. It lacks the nice feature of non-destructive editing
and the small size of the lzn-files (and templates, ...), but it is a fine
tool for day-to-day work.

Bernhard
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@kast-dev.com
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look at the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source, but free and for me one of the best out there.

http://www.rawtherapee.com/

Regards,
Michael





Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Markus Spring :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bernhard Bablok schrieb:
> Fortunately, there are free alternatives. I'm using ufraw/gimp in parallel
> with Lightzone, since ufraw somtimes gives better results. Another nice
Oh, just yesterday I compiled the newest version. Good, at last exiv support,
but I do miss the regions tools where I could so wonderful differentiate the
tonality of parts of the picture.
> alternative is digikam/showfoto (showfoto is the stand-alone editor of
> digikam - useful if you do not want to use the archiving features of
I am an avid user of digikam. My question arose from the necessity of calling
lightzone out of digikam
> digikam). Showfoto has 16-bit support, also uses dcraw, and focusses on the
> needs of photographers. It lacks the nice feature of non-destructive editing
> and the small size of the lzn-files (and templates, ...), but it is a fine
> tool for day-to-day work.
well, I always had difficulties obtaining results similar to the in-camera-jpegs
with showfoto. It's just not intuitive enough (for me) and batch work with a
tool stack like I've done it in lightzone is not so easy either.

Anyhow I'm quite disappointed from lightcrafts, especially because of their
patronising manners in the forum. Complaining that they've spent windows-earned
money in linux development but having dcraw as the core of their raw conversion
is really brazen... assuming they didn't pay half a million to dave coffin for
his work.

Best regards - Markus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+4nZxxUzQSse11ARAoxPAJ4n9JMHRENLAYtzxD0DCbOK7BHLmQCeNl/A
y5uvkUrcoVUxkfSzvsga5lo=
=oKP1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Markus Spring :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

okapi schrieb:
> Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look at
> the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source, but
> free and for me one of the best out there.

Just has a look at it - promising and fast. It's just the regions... And of
course I miss that zonemapper preview to easily identify which area of the image
are going to be affected.

Thanks - Markus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+5N5xxUzQSse11ARAogUAJ0S+2kwUQ1x/9msVw+9Py9tQeLorACfRvAq
sdRslGJhXotUgFF+laiE1m4=
=oRUg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Michael Singer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Markus Spring wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

okapi schrieb:
> Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look at
> the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source, but
> free and for me one of the best out there.

Just has a look at it - promising and fast. It's just the regions... And of
course I miss that zonemapper preview to easily identify which area of the image
are going to be affected.

Thanks - Markus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG+5N5xxUzQSse11ARAogUAJ0S+2kwUQ1x/9msVw+9Py9tQeLorACfRvAq
sdRslGJhXotUgFF+laiE1m4=
=oRUg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@kast-dev.com
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
Well, i'm using both, Raw Therapee for conversion, white-balance, color editing and fine tuning, sharpness enhancement, noise reduction, and then, if necessary, LightZone for zone editing, light and shadow details.
If you take a deeper look at it, you will find that Raw Therapee can do a lot of high quality image editing, so, in most cases, for me there is just the resizing job left to do for another program.
For this (and other tasks) i use PhotoLine32 with CrossOver Linux, which works quite fine.
(A little bit off topic, sorry for that.)

Regards,
Michael


Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Charles Basenga Kiyanda :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I just read the thread on the lightcrafts forum. Quite unfortunate to
hear that they're not developing the linux version anymore. Seems to me
like Jacek should go work for Lightcrafts. From what I read, I would
expect anyone in Lightcrafts' position to make him an offer on the spot...

Well, off I go to find a different raw editor now. RawTherapee did seem
quite good last time I checked.

Charles

Markus Spring wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bernhard Bablok schrieb:
>  
>> Fortunately, there are free alternatives. I'm using ufraw/gimp in parallel
>> with Lightzone, since ufraw somtimes gives better results. Another nice
>>    
> Oh, just yesterday I compiled the newest version. Good, at last exiv support,
> but I do miss the regions tools where I could so wonderful differentiate the
> tonality of parts of the picture.
>  
>> alternative is digikam/showfoto (showfoto is the stand-alone editor of
>> digikam - useful if you do not want to use the archiving features of
>>    
> I am an avid user of digikam. My question arose from the necessity of calling
> lightzone out of digikam
>  
>> digikam). Showfoto has 16-bit support, also uses dcraw, and focusses on the
>> needs of photographers. It lacks the nice feature of non-destructive editing
>> and the small size of the lzn-files (and templates, ...), but it is a fine
>> tool for day-to-day work.
>>    
> well, I always had difficulties obtaining results similar to the in-camera-jpegs
> with showfoto. It's just not intuitive enough (for me) and batch work with a
> tool stack like I've done it in lightzone is not so easy either.
>
> Anyhow I'm quite disappointed from lightcrafts, especially because of their
> patronising manners in the forum. Complaining that they've spent windows-earned
> money in linux development but having dcraw as the core of their raw conversion
> is really brazen... assuming they didn't pay half a million to dave coffin for
> his work.
>
> Best regards - Markus
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFG+4nZxxUzQSse11ARAoxPAJ4n9JMHRENLAYtzxD0DCbOK7BHLmQCeNl/A
> y5uvkUrcoVUxkfSzvsga5lo=
> =oKP1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>
>  

_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by SoftRomu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Guys,
It is worth to have a look at the RawTherapee forum, especially the
"suggestions" one.

romu

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Singer" <mail@...>
To: <lightzone@...>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Lightzone] calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline


>
>
>
> Markus Spring wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> okapi schrieb:
>>> Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look
>>> at
>>> the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source,
>>> but
>>> free and for me one of the best out there.
>>
>> Just has a look at it - promising and fast. It's just the regions... And
>> of
>> course I miss that zonemapper preview to easily identify which area of
>> the
>> image
>> are going to be affected.
>>
>> Thanks - Markus
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFG+5N5xxUzQSse11ARAogUAJ0S+2kwUQ1x/9msVw+9Py9tQeLorACfRvAq
>> sdRslGJhXotUgFF+laiE1m4=
>> =oRUg
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> LightZone mailing list
>> LightZone@...
>> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>>
>>
>
> Well, i'm using both, Raw Therapee for conversion, white-balance, color
> editing and fine tuning, sharpness enhancement, noise reduction, and then,
> if necessary, LightZone for zone editing, light and shadow details.
> If you take a deeper look at it, you will find that Raw Therapee can do a
> lot of high quality image editing, so, in most cases, for me there is just
> the resizing job left to to for another program.
> For this (and other tasks) i use PhotoLine32 with CrossOver Linux, which
> works quite fine.
> (A little bit off topic, sorry for that.)
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/calling-lightzone-with-raw-filename-on-commandline-tf4524329.html#a12919822
> Sent from the LightZone for Linux mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>

_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Arnold Melm :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello,


Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 11:19 schrieb Bernhard Bablok:
> Fortunately, there are free alternatives.

Yes, that's right. There's cinepaint (aka film gimp), too. Sometimes the more
professional tool beside the Gimp. Cinepaint has no problems with 16 oder 32
bit and is useful for film, video, photography and print.

I think, dcraw is used in nearly every tool that's made for reading raw
formats in Open Source ... and still in closed solutions.

Ciao,
Arnold









_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Bugzilla from risto@kurppa.fi :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

romu: would be easier if you just provided the links :)

But I suppose you try to make us see this:
http://www.rawtherapee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=95&highlight=selective

Selective image adjustments (=zones..) planned for RT 3.0

r



2007/9/27, SoftRomu <softromu@...>:

> Guys,
> It is worth to have a look at the RawTherapee forum, especially the
> "suggestions" one.
>
> romu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Singer" <mail@...>
> To: <lightzone@...>
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Lightzone] calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Markus Spring wrote:
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> okapi schrieb:
> >>> Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look
> >>> at
> >>> the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source,
> >>> but
> >>> free and for me one of the best out there.
> >>
> >> Just has a look at it - promising and fast. It's just the regions... And
> >> of
> >> course I miss that zonemapper preview to easily identify which area of
> >> the
> >> image
> >> are going to be affected.
> >>
> >> Thanks - Markus
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >>
> >> iD8DBQFG+5N5xxUzQSse11ARAogUAJ0S+2kwUQ1x/9msVw+9Py9tQeLorACfRvAq
> >> sdRslGJhXotUgFF+laiE1m4=
> >> =oRUg
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LightZone mailing list
> >> LightZone@...
> >> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Well, i'm using both, Raw Therapee for conversion, white-balance, color
> > editing and fine tuning, sharpness enhancement, noise reduction, and then,
> > if necessary, LightZone for zone editing, light and shadow details.
> > If you take a deeper look at it, you will find that Raw Therapee can do a
> > lot of high quality image editing, so, in most cases, for me there is just
> > the resizing job left to to for another program.
> > For this (and other tasks) i use PhotoLine32 with CrossOver Linux, which
> > works quite fine.
> > (A little bit off topic, sorry for that.)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/calling-lightzone-with-raw-filename-on-commandline-tf4524329.html#a12919822
> > Sent from the LightZone for Linux mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LightZone mailing list
> > LightZone@...
> > http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@...
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>
>
_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@...
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone

Re: calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline

by Angryziber :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I have examined the way LightZone stores its settings and have written a small script to force LightZone to load the specified file on startup. Here is more info and working code: http://blog.azib.net/2008/11/opening-files-with-lightzone-from.html

Anton

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Singer" <mail@a-visual-notebook.at>
To: <lightzone@kast-dev.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Lightzone] calling lightzone with raw-filename on commandline


>
>
>
> Markus Spring wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> okapi schrieb:
>>> Regarding free alternatives for RAW images, i invite you to take a look
>>> at
>>> the excellent RAW processing program "Raw Therapee". Not open source,
>>> but
>>> free and for me one of the best out there.
>>
>> Just has a look at it - promising and fast. It's just the regions... And
>> of
>> course I miss that zonemapper preview to easily identify which area of
>> the
>> image
>> are going to be affected.
>>
>> Thanks - Markus
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFG+5N5xxUzQSse11ARAogUAJ0S+2kwUQ1x/9msVw+9Py9tQeLorACfRvAq
>> sdRslGJhXotUgFF+laiE1m4=
>> =oRUg
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> LightZone mailing list
>> LightZone@kast-dev.com
>> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>>
>>
>
> Well, i'm using both, Raw Therapee for conversion, white-balance, color
> editing and fine tuning, sharpness enhancement, noise reduction, and then,
> if necessary, LightZone for zone editing, light and shadow details.
> If you take a deeper look at it, you will find that Raw Therapee can do a
> lot of high quality image editing, so, in most cases, for me there is just
> the resizing job left to to for another program.
> For this (and other tasks) i use PhotoLine32 with CrossOver Linux, which
> works quite fine.
> (A little bit off topic, sorry for that.)
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/calling-lightzone-with-raw-filename-on-commandline-tf4524329.html#a12919822
> Sent from the LightZone for Linux mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LightZone mailing list
> LightZone@kast-dev.com
> http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone
>

_______________________________________________
LightZone mailing list
LightZone@kast-dev.com
http://kast-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/lightzone