|
»
changing kickoff time
|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
 |
changing kickoff time
by Carsten John
::
Rate this Message:
Hello everybody,
we moved our samba server to a new machine. This included changing the samba version from 3.024 to 3.4.2 and changing the OS from Linux to Opensolaris. Samba was compiled from scratch. Passdb Backend is tdb. After the upgrade everything works fine......except: Some users can not login, due to an expired account. Further investigation showed that the "Kickoff Time" of the affected users is set to "Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:59:59 CET". All unaffected user show up "never" for the Kickoff Parameter. Is there a way to control the kickoff time via command line? A quick grep through the sources showed up the "pdb_set_kickoff_time" function in passdb.c, but the function seems only to be referenced by pdb_ldap.c which does not help with our tdb backend. Deleting und recreating the user would work, but forces us to reset the passwords.... thx Carsten -- Max Planck Institut fuer marine Mikrobiologie - Network Administration - Celsiustr. 1 D-28359 Bremen Tel.: +49 421 2028568 Fax.: +49 421 2028565 PGP public key:http://www.mpi-bremen.de/Carsten_John.html -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
Checked up on my new 3.3.8 installation and found this after a vista workstation was idle all day on the network I forgot to save the smbstatus output but it was a long list of PIDs linked to the workstation in question. Also I restarted then stopped the server and all the processes stayed there. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12484 root 1 117 0 11388K 8080K CPU3 3 6:38 93.65% bzip2 546 root 1 51 0 3184K 988K select 3 70:47 12.60% syslogd 12558 root 1 98 0 14624K 5628K RUN 3 0:06 9.57% smbd 9540 root 1 98 0 14624K 5500K RUN 2 27:59 0.00% smbd 11658 root 1 98 0 14624K 5596K RUN 3 23:29 0.00% smbd 10785 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 2 23:04 0.00% smbd 9836 root 1 102 0 14624K 5492K RUN 2 22:56 0.00% smbd 11076 root 1 98 0 14624K 5540K RUN 0 21:43 0.00% smbd 10495 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 0 21:28 0.00% smbd 11979 root 1 97 0 14624K 5608K RUN 0 19:53 0.00% smbd 10183 root 1 97 0 14624K 5504K RUN 2 13:26 0.00% smbd 11472 root 1 97 0 14624K 5588K RUN 0 12:21 0.00% smbd 10328 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 0 7:45 0.00% smbd 11385 root 1 99 0 14624K 5568K RUN 2 7:27 0.00% smbd 10730 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 4:06 0.00% smbd 9472 root 1 98 0 14624K 5484K RUN 2 3:36 0.00% smbd 11932 root 1 98 0 14624K 5600K RUN 0 3:17 0.00% smbd 11609 root 1 98 0 14624K 5588K RUN 3 3:05 0.00% smbd 10085 root 1 99 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 3:04 0.00% smbd 10129 root 1 98 0 14624K 5504K RUN 0 2:52 0.00% smbd 11029 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 2:16 0.00% smbd 11904 root 1 98 0 14624K 5584K RUN 3 2:04 0.00% smbd 12246 root 1 98 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 2:03 0.00% smbd 9454 root 1 99 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 1:54 0.00% smbd 9172 root 1 100 0 14624K 5424K RUN 2 1:52 0.00% smbd 10441 root 1 98 0 14624K 5520K RUN 2 1:48 0.00% smbd 10475 root 1 97 0 14624K 5480K RUN 0 1:30 0.00% smbd 11340 root 1 98 0 14624K 5552K RUN 0 1:28 0.00% smbd 10420 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 2 1:21 0.00% smbd 11309 root 1 98 0 14624K 5512K RUN 2 1:14 0.00% smbd 12207 root 1 97 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 1:05 0.00% smbd 12195 root 1 98 0 14708K 5592K RUN 0 0:41 0.00% smbd 10175 root 1 97 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 0:34 0.00% smbd 12220 root 1 97 0 14708K 5624K RUN 0 0:29 0.00% smbd 11377 root 1 97 0 14624K 5568K RUN 0 0:24 0.00% smbd 3797 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 3 0:24 0.00% sshd 11326 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 0 0:21 0.00% smbd 3867 root 1 44 0 8340K 4364K select 3 0:17 0.00% mc 9533 root 1 97 0 14624K 5448K RUN 0 0:12 0.00% smbd 11067 root 1 98 0 14624K 5496K RUN 0 0:09 0.00% smbd 11371 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 2 0:09 0.00% smbd 9448 root 1 98 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 0:04 0.00% smbd 5945 root 1 44 0 4672K 1624K select 3 0:04 0.00% ntpd 786 root 1 44 0 5876K 2440K select 0 0:02 0.00% sendmail 3742 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 2 0:02 0.00% sshd 5732 bind 7 4 0 28916K 22612K kqread 2 0:01 0.00% named 5886 dhcpd 1 44 0 3128K 1656K select 0 0:01 0.00% dhcpd 3869 root 1 5 0 4396K 1780K ttyin 2 0:01 0.00% bash 796 root 1 8 0 3212K 960K nanslp 2 0:00 0.00% cron 790 smmsp 1 20 0 5876K 2192K pause 3 0:00 0.00% sendmail 3801 root 1 8 0 4396K 1732K wait 3 0:00 0.00% bash 3746 root 1 8 0 4396K 1652K wait 2 0:00 0.00% bash 12555 root 1 96 0 14428K 5428K select 2 0:00 0.00% smbd 12559 root 1 44 0 3496K 1496K CPU0 0 0:00 0.00% top 487 root 1 44 0 1888K 428K select 0 0:00 0.00% devd 780 root 1 44 0 5752K 2292K select 0 0:00 0.00% sshd 12549 root 1 50 0 9516K 3008K select 3 0:00 0.00% nmbd 12471 root 1 8 0 3128K 964K wait 0 0:00 0.00% newsyslog Ohh and I started getting this again.....this problem has come and gone lately...its back now. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Brian Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
Also, here is my config...
[global] workgroup = XNET2 server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.0.2., 127. guest account = guest interfaces = dc0 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m-samba.log max log size = 500 time server = Yes socket options = SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 security = user passdb backend = tdbsam dns proxy = no load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes wins support = Yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home directory for %u on %h browseable = no writable = yes path = /usr/home/%u/Documents valid users = %S [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /usr/samba-shares/tmp read only = no public = yes [public] comment = Public Directory, r/w all users, guest owns all files path = /usr/samba-shares/public public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable = no [share1] comment = Share Directory No. 1, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server1 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel [share2] comment = Share Directory No. 2, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server2 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel [share3] comment = Share Directory No. 3, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server3 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces@... [mailto:samba-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:34 PM To: samba@... Subject: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? Checked up on my new 3.3.8 installation and found this after a vista workstation was idle all day on the network I forgot to save the smbstatus output but it was a long list of PIDs linked to the workstation in question. Also I restarted then stopped the server and all the processes stayed there. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12484 root 1 117 0 11388K 8080K CPU3 3 6:38 93.65% bzip2 546 root 1 51 0 3184K 988K select 3 70:47 12.60% syslogd 12558 root 1 98 0 14624K 5628K RUN 3 0:06 9.57% smbd 9540 root 1 98 0 14624K 5500K RUN 2 27:59 0.00% smbd 11658 root 1 98 0 14624K 5596K RUN 3 23:29 0.00% smbd 10785 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 2 23:04 0.00% smbd 9836 root 1 102 0 14624K 5492K RUN 2 22:56 0.00% smbd 11076 root 1 98 0 14624K 5540K RUN 0 21:43 0.00% smbd 10495 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 0 21:28 0.00% smbd 11979 root 1 97 0 14624K 5608K RUN 0 19:53 0.00% smbd 10183 root 1 97 0 14624K 5504K RUN 2 13:26 0.00% smbd 11472 root 1 97 0 14624K 5588K RUN 0 12:21 0.00% smbd 10328 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 0 7:45 0.00% smbd 11385 root 1 99 0 14624K 5568K RUN 2 7:27 0.00% smbd 10730 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 4:06 0.00% smbd 9472 root 1 98 0 14624K 5484K RUN 2 3:36 0.00% smbd 11932 root 1 98 0 14624K 5600K RUN 0 3:17 0.00% smbd 11609 root 1 98 0 14624K 5588K RUN 3 3:05 0.00% smbd 10085 root 1 99 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 3:04 0.00% smbd 10129 root 1 98 0 14624K 5504K RUN 0 2:52 0.00% smbd 11029 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 2:16 0.00% smbd 11904 root 1 98 0 14624K 5584K RUN 3 2:04 0.00% smbd 12246 root 1 98 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 2:03 0.00% smbd 9454 root 1 99 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 1:54 0.00% smbd 9172 root 1 100 0 14624K 5424K RUN 2 1:52 0.00% smbd 10441 root 1 98 0 14624K 5520K RUN 2 1:48 0.00% smbd 10475 root 1 97 0 14624K 5480K RUN 0 1:30 0.00% smbd 11340 root 1 98 0 14624K 5552K RUN 0 1:28 0.00% smbd 10420 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 2 1:21 0.00% smbd 11309 root 1 98 0 14624K 5512K RUN 2 1:14 0.00% smbd 12207 root 1 97 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 1:05 0.00% smbd 12195 root 1 98 0 14708K 5592K RUN 0 0:41 0.00% smbd 10175 root 1 97 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 0:34 0.00% smbd 12220 root 1 97 0 14708K 5624K RUN 0 0:29 0.00% smbd 11377 root 1 97 0 14624K 5568K RUN 0 0:24 0.00% smbd 3797 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 3 0:24 0.00% sshd 11326 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 0 0:21 0.00% smbd 3867 root 1 44 0 8340K 4364K select 3 0:17 0.00% mc 9533 root 1 97 0 14624K 5448K RUN 0 0:12 0.00% smbd 11067 root 1 98 0 14624K 5496K RUN 0 0:09 0.00% smbd 11371 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 2 0:09 0.00% smbd 9448 root 1 98 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 0:04 0.00% smbd 5945 root 1 44 0 4672K 1624K select 3 0:04 0.00% ntpd 786 root 1 44 0 5876K 2440K select 0 0:02 0.00% sendmail 3742 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 2 0:02 0.00% sshd 5732 bind 7 4 0 28916K 22612K kqread 2 0:01 0.00% named 5886 dhcpd 1 44 0 3128K 1656K select 0 0:01 0.00% dhcpd 3869 root 1 5 0 4396K 1780K ttyin 2 0:01 0.00% bash 796 root 1 8 0 3212K 960K nanslp 2 0:00 0.00% cron 790 smmsp 1 20 0 5876K 2192K pause 3 0:00 0.00% sendmail 3801 root 1 8 0 4396K 1732K wait 3 0:00 0.00% bash 3746 root 1 8 0 4396K 1652K wait 2 0:00 0.00% bash 12555 root 1 96 0 14428K 5428K select 2 0:00 0.00% smbd 12559 root 1 44 0 3496K 1496K CPU0 0 0:00 0.00% top 487 root 1 44 0 1888K 428K select 0 0:00 0.00% devd 780 root 1 44 0 5752K 2292K select 0 0:00 0.00% sshd 12549 root 1 50 0 9516K 3008K select 3 0:00 0.00% nmbd 12471 root 1 8 0 3128K 964K wait 0 0:00 0.00% newsyslog Ohh and I started getting this again.....this problem has come and gone lately...its back now. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Brian Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Matthew Dickinson-5
::
Rate this Message:
On 10/26/09 6:34 PM, "Brian" <bbayorgeon@...> wrote: > > Ohh and I started getting this again.....this problem has come and gone > lately...its back now. > > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] > smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) > Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't > find service roo Likewise: Situation: I'm seeing lots (~500k per day) of log entries like: smbd[13939]: itlab-pc06 (::ffff:10.51.51.103) couldn't find service it261 In this case, the last character of the request is truncated - it should be it2610 I'm seeing the same/similar issue to http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-March/147277.html And http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-October/150998.html I've dismissed this over the last few weeks as a minor inconvenience, but I'm now convinced that it's affecting the performance of the Windows client machines that are connecting to it - a 30 second operation on local disk, takes upwards of 5 mins over a network connection, generating thousands of entries similar to the above. Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
Just looked .... I'm getting 500K log every 12 seconds with log level 2. My "new" server is a box with modern hardware and so forth and its spending 24% processor time filling out logs. John suggest 3.3.8 and I realized I was at 3.3.3 so I upgraded samba to 3.3.8 and got the same result! So I have had samba version 3.0.something (older FBSD implementation, older 166 pentium) through 3.3.8 running (7.2 FBSD implementation with modern hardware) and all of them are being flooded by vista. Ya ya I know...blame Gates, but there must be a fix here some place? The situation with 3.3.8 is the first time I noticed dozens of samba processes spawned as a result. Earlier versions got spammed, but didn't branch a bunch of processes. thanks for your help in advance. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Dickinson [mailto:matt-samba@...] On 10/26/09 6:34 PM, "Brian" <bbayorgeon@...> wrote: > > Ohh and I started getting this again.....this problem has come and gone > lately...its back now. > > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] > smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) > Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't > find service roo Likewise: Situation: I'm seeing lots (~500k per day) of log entries like: smbd[13939]: itlab-pc06 (::ffff:10.51.51.103) couldn't find service it261 In this case, the last character of the request is truncated - it should be it2610 I'm seeing the same/similar issue to http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-March/147277.html And http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-October/150998.html I've dismissed this over the last few weeks as a minor inconvenience, but I'm now convinced that it's affecting the performance of the Windows client machines that are connecting to it - a 30 second operation on local disk, takes upwards of 5 mins over a network connection, generating thousands of entries similar to the above. Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections? AKA "New issue with a New Vista Client - couldn't find service"
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
Did some research, but didn't find a solution. All the following links
discuss a similar issue with not being able to find a service and in most cases the error reports the service name truncated by one character. One was reporting the service name with extra characters. These date back to 2003 and maybe earlier. Some interesting discussions with some indicating a Windoze bug persisting from Win2k thru WinXP (and now vista) Others report it is a long standing samba bug since 2.x....who knows. One common thing near as I can tell is solutions are not identified. Many seem to ignore it, but the traffic and logs are putting quite a burden on the system. Again any thoughts are appreciated thanks Brian http://www.webservertalk.com/message857789.html http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/logs-filling-up-w ith-smbdservice.cmakeconnection-couldnt-find-service-397227/ http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2005-October/007173.html http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112876.html http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112878.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-October/023809.htm l -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces@... [mailto:samba-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:50 PM To: samba@... Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? Also, here is my config... [global] workgroup = XNET2 server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 10.0.2., 127. guest account = guest interfaces = dc0 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m-samba.log max log size = 500 time server = Yes socket options = SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 security = user passdb backend = tdbsam dns proxy = no load printers = no printing = bsd printcap name = /dev/null disable spoolss = yes wins support = Yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home directory for %u on %h browseable = no writable = yes path = /usr/home/%u/Documents valid users = %S [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /usr/samba-shares/tmp read only = no public = yes [public] comment = Public Directory, r/w all users, guest owns all files path = /usr/samba-shares/public public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable = no [share1] comment = Share Directory No. 1, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server1 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel [share2] comment = Share Directory No. 2, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server2 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel [share3] comment = Share Directory No. 3, Writable only by group wheel members path = /usr/samba-shares/file-server3 public = yes writable = yes printable = no write list = @wheel -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces@... [mailto:samba-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:34 PM To: samba@... Subject: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? Checked up on my new 3.3.8 installation and found this after a vista workstation was idle all day on the network I forgot to save the smbstatus output but it was a long list of PIDs linked to the workstation in question. Also I restarted then stopped the server and all the processes stayed there. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 12484 root 1 117 0 11388K 8080K CPU3 3 6:38 93.65% bzip2 546 root 1 51 0 3184K 988K select 3 70:47 12.60% syslogd 12558 root 1 98 0 14624K 5628K RUN 3 0:06 9.57% smbd 9540 root 1 98 0 14624K 5500K RUN 2 27:59 0.00% smbd 11658 root 1 98 0 14624K 5596K RUN 3 23:29 0.00% smbd 10785 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 2 23:04 0.00% smbd 9836 root 1 102 0 14624K 5492K RUN 2 22:56 0.00% smbd 11076 root 1 98 0 14624K 5540K RUN 0 21:43 0.00% smbd 10495 root 1 98 0 14624K 5544K RUN 0 21:28 0.00% smbd 11979 root 1 97 0 14624K 5608K RUN 0 19:53 0.00% smbd 10183 root 1 97 0 14624K 5504K RUN 2 13:26 0.00% smbd 11472 root 1 97 0 14624K 5588K RUN 0 12:21 0.00% smbd 10328 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 0 7:45 0.00% smbd 11385 root 1 99 0 14624K 5568K RUN 2 7:27 0.00% smbd 10730 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 4:06 0.00% smbd 9472 root 1 98 0 14624K 5484K RUN 2 3:36 0.00% smbd 11932 root 1 98 0 14624K 5600K RUN 0 3:17 0.00% smbd 11609 root 1 98 0 14624K 5588K RUN 3 3:05 0.00% smbd 10085 root 1 99 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 3:04 0.00% smbd 10129 root 1 98 0 14624K 5504K RUN 0 2:52 0.00% smbd 11029 root 1 98 0 14624K 5536K RUN 0 2:16 0.00% smbd 11904 root 1 98 0 14624K 5584K RUN 3 2:04 0.00% smbd 12246 root 1 98 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 2:03 0.00% smbd 9454 root 1 99 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 1:54 0.00% smbd 9172 root 1 100 0 14624K 5424K RUN 2 1:52 0.00% smbd 10441 root 1 98 0 14624K 5520K RUN 2 1:48 0.00% smbd 10475 root 1 97 0 14624K 5480K RUN 0 1:30 0.00% smbd 11340 root 1 98 0 14624K 5552K RUN 0 1:28 0.00% smbd 10420 root 1 97 0 14624K 5516K RUN 2 1:21 0.00% smbd 11309 root 1 98 0 14624K 5512K RUN 2 1:14 0.00% smbd 12207 root 1 97 0 14708K 5664K RUN 0 1:05 0.00% smbd 12195 root 1 98 0 14708K 5592K RUN 0 0:41 0.00% smbd 10175 root 1 97 0 14624K 5488K RUN 0 0:34 0.00% smbd 12220 root 1 97 0 14708K 5624K RUN 0 0:29 0.00% smbd 11377 root 1 97 0 14624K 5568K RUN 0 0:24 0.00% smbd 3797 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 3 0:24 0.00% sshd 11326 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 0 0:21 0.00% smbd 3867 root 1 44 0 8340K 4364K select 3 0:17 0.00% mc 9533 root 1 97 0 14624K 5448K RUN 0 0:12 0.00% smbd 11067 root 1 98 0 14624K 5496K RUN 0 0:09 0.00% smbd 11371 root 1 97 0 14624K 5528K RUN 2 0:09 0.00% smbd 9448 root 1 98 0 14624K 5448K RUN 2 0:04 0.00% smbd 5945 root 1 44 0 4672K 1624K select 3 0:04 0.00% ntpd 786 root 1 44 0 5876K 2440K select 0 0:02 0.00% sendmail 3742 root 1 44 0 8428K 2656K select 2 0:02 0.00% sshd 5732 bind 7 4 0 28916K 22612K kqread 2 0:01 0.00% named 5886 dhcpd 1 44 0 3128K 1656K select 0 0:01 0.00% dhcpd 3869 root 1 5 0 4396K 1780K ttyin 2 0:01 0.00% bash 796 root 1 8 0 3212K 960K nanslp 2 0:00 0.00% cron 790 smmsp 1 20 0 5876K 2192K pause 3 0:00 0.00% sendmail 3801 root 1 8 0 4396K 1732K wait 3 0:00 0.00% bash 3746 root 1 8 0 4396K 1652K wait 2 0:00 0.00% bash 12555 root 1 96 0 14428K 5428K select 2 0:00 0.00% smbd 12559 root 1 44 0 3496K 1496K CPU0 0 0:00 0.00% top 487 root 1 44 0 1888K 428K select 0 0:00 0.00% devd 780 root 1 44 0 5752K 2292K select 0 0:00 0.00% sshd 12549 root 1 50 0 9516K 3008K select 3 0:00 0.00% nmbd 12471 root 1 8 0 3128K 964K wait 0 0:00 0.00% newsyslog Ohh and I started getting this again.....this problem has come and gone lately...its back now. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Brian Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: [2009/10/26 18:00:36, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) Oct 26 18:00:36 oldjunk smbd[12268]: dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Volker Lendecke
::
Rate this Message:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:49:37PM -0500, Brian wrote:
> Also, here is my config... > > [global] > workgroup = XNET2 > server string = Samba Server > hosts allow = 10.0.2., 127. > guest account = guest > interfaces = dc0 > log level = 2 > log file = /var/log/samba/%m-samba.log > max log size = 500 > time server = Yes > socket options = SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > security = user > passdb backend = tdbsam > dns proxy = no > load printers = no > printing = bsd > printcap name = /dev/null > disable spoolss = yes spoolss = yes"? Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Jeremy Allison
::
Rate this Message:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:57:20PM -0500, Brian wrote:
> > > > Just looked .... I'm getting 500K log every 12 seconds with log level 2. My > "new" server is a box with modern hardware and so forth and its spending 24% > processor time filling out logs. > > John suggest 3.3.8 and I realized I was at 3.3.3 so I upgraded samba to > 3.3.8 and got the same result! > > So I have had samba version 3.0.something (older FBSD implementation, older > 166 pentium) through 3.3.8 running (7.2 FBSD implementation with modern > hardware) and all of them are being flooded by vista. Ya ya I know...blame > Gates, but there must be a fix here some place? > > The situation with 3.3.8 is the first time I noticed dozens of samba > processes spawned as a result. Earlier versions got spammed, but didn't > branch a bunch of processes. Log a bug at bugzilla.samba.org and attach a debug level 10 log from one client and also a wireshark trace. The wireshark trace is very important in order to determine if this is a client or server bug. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
well, unfortunately no, that didn't fix it. Good eyes though!
-----Original Message----- From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:04 AM To: Brian Cc: samba@... Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:49:37PM -0500, Brian wrote: > Also, here is my config... > > [global] > workgroup = XNET2 > server string = Samba Server > hosts allow = 10.0.2., 127. > guest account = guest > interfaces = dc0 > log level = 2 > log file = /var/log/samba/%m-samba.log > max log size = 500 > time server = Yes > socket options = SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > security = user > passdb backend = tdbsam > dns proxy = no > load printers = no > printing = bsd > printcap name = /dev/null > disable spoolss = yes Maybe for some reason your client is unhappy with "disable spoolss = yes"? Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Matthew Dickinson-5
::
Rate this Message:
On 10/27/09 4:31 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra@...> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:57:20PM -0500, Brian wrote: >> >> >> >> Just looked .... I'm getting 500K log every 12 seconds with log level 2. My >> "new" server is a box with modern hardware and so forth and its spending 24% >> processor time filling out logs. >> >> John suggest 3.3.8 and I realized I was at 3.3.3 so I upgraded samba to >> 3.3.8 and got the same result! >> >> So I have had samba version 3.0.something (older FBSD implementation, older >> 166 pentium) through 3.3.8 running (7.2 FBSD implementation with modern >> hardware) and all of them are being flooded by vista. Ya ya I know...blame >> Gates, but there must be a fix here some place? >> >> The situation with 3.3.8 is the first time I noticed dozens of samba >> processes spawned as a result. Earlier versions got spammed, but didn't >> branch a bunch of processes. > > Log a bug at bugzilla.samba.org and attach a debug level 10 log > from one client and also a wireshark trace. The wireshark trace > is very important in order to determine if this is a client or > server bug. > > Jeremy. Already done that :-) https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6782 Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Jeremy Allison
::
Rate this Message:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
> > On 10/27/09 4:31 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra@...> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:57:20PM -0500, Brian wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Just looked .... I'm getting 500K log every 12 seconds with log level 2. My > >> "new" server is a box with modern hardware and so forth and its spending 24% > >> processor time filling out logs. > >> > >> John suggest 3.3.8 and I realized I was at 3.3.3 so I upgraded samba to > >> 3.3.8 and got the same result! > >> > >> So I have had samba version 3.0.something (older FBSD implementation, older > >> 166 pentium) through 3.3.8 running (7.2 FBSD implementation with modern > >> hardware) and all of them are being flooded by vista. Ya ya I know...blame > >> Gates, but there must be a fix here some place? > >> > >> The situation with 3.3.8 is the first time I noticed dozens of samba > >> processes spawned as a result. Earlier versions got spammed, but didn't > >> branch a bunch of processes. > > > > Log a bug at bugzilla.samba.org and attach a debug level 10 log > > from one client and also a wireshark trace. The wireshark trace > > is very important in order to determine if this is a client or > > server bug. > > > > Jeremy. > > Already done that :-) > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6782 Ah, ok. I see Valker already took a look at it and it looks like a client problem. I'll also take a look (time permitting). Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
>On 10/27/09 4:31 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra@...> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:57:20PM -0500, Brian wrote: >>> Just looked .... I'm getting 500K log every 12 seconds with log level 2. My >>> "new" server is a box with modern hardware and so forth and its spending 24% >>> processor time filling out logs. >>> >>> John suggest 3.3.8 and I realized I was at 3.3.3 so I upgraded samba to >>> 3.3.8 and got the same result! >>> >>> So I have had samba version 3.0.something (older FBSD implementation, older >>> 166 pentium) through 3.3.8 running (7.2 FBSD implementation with modern >>> hardware) and all of them are being flooded by vista. Ya ya I know...blame >>> Gates, but there must be a fix here some place? >>> >>> The situation with 3.3.8 is the first time I noticed dozens of samba >>> processes spawned as a result. Earlier versions got spammed, but didn't >>> branch a bunch of processes. >> >> Log a bug at bugzilla.samba.org and attach a debug level 10 log >> from one client and also a wireshark trace. The wireshark trace >> is very important in order to determine if this is a client or >> server bug. >> >> Jeremy. > >Already done that :-) > >https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6782 > >Matthew I will try and do the same at bugzilla but for now a bit more information after some experimentation. When homes share definition is removed I get: [2009/10/27 17:23:33, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo [2009/10/27 17:23:33, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service roo [2009/10/27 17:23:33, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service root [2009/10/27 17:23:33, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1292) dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) couldn't find service root This supports comments from other people that the client re-tries with the correct name and then connects. I do not have issues connecting to my home share. Maybe some lag sometimes... When I make a share named "roo", the "can't find service" messages go away and I get a visible "roo" share. Also get the following from smbstatus when I have made no attempt to connect to the "roo" share with explorer or whatever. This tells me the client is purposely trying to connect to "roo" by itself. Samba version 3.3.8 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 6848 root wheel dadsdesktop (10.0.2.149) Service pid machine Connected at ------------------------------------------------------- roo 6848 dadsdesktop Tue Oct 27 18:55:56 2009 root 6848 dadsdesktop Tue Oct 27 18:55:56 2009 No locked files Seems to me the client is the issue here... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Matthew Dickinson-5
::
Rate this Message:
On 10/27/09 6:32 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra@...> wrote: > Ah, ok. I see Valker already took a look at it and it > looks like a client problem. I'll also take a look (time > permitting). In that case, I'd really _love_ as much information to "prove" that as possible - since we've got support from MS, I plan on raising this as an issue with MS support. If it's hard to "prove" it's a Windows "feature", I can see the conversation going: "it's a Samba bug", and you saying "it's an MS bug" and them saying "it's a Samba bug" and and and :-) Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Jeremy Allison
::
Rate this Message:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:52:59PM -0500, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
> > On 10/27/09 6:32 PM, "Jeremy Allison" <jra@...> wrote: > > Ah, ok. I see Valker already took a look at it and it > > looks like a client problem. I'll also take a look (time > > permitting). > > In that case, I'd really _love_ as much information to "prove" that as > possible - since we've got support from MS, I plan on raising this as an > issue with MS support. > > If it's hard to "prove" it's a Windows "feature", I can see the conversation > going: > > "it's a Samba bug", > and you saying "it's an MS bug" > and them saying "it's a Samba bug" > and > and > and > > :-) No, we're not that bad. After all, if it works to Windows but not to Samba then by definition it's a Samba bug :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Matthew Dickinson-5
::
Rate this Message:
Which got me to thinking: The thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112876.html In particular the last post http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112929.html So... new config item: w2k client workaround = yes iff requested share does not exist, but a single share with the same name plus one character does exist, connect to that instead. Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
Sorry I don't think so....basically as you can see in my earlier
post I tried a workaround by creating a share with the last character clipped off (in my case "roo"). Great news, the attempt to connect msgs are now gone, but my server is still being spammed I did some stats on my client with a "net statistics workstation" command and came up with: Bytes received 137,514 bytes/sec Server Message Blocks (SMBs) received 1,302 SMB blocks/sec Bytes transmitted 95,329 bytes/sec Server Message Blocks (SMBs) transmitted 1,302 SMB blocks/sec So the error msgs are gone, but the server is getting spammed with greater than 1000 SMB msg blocks per second while IDLE! I don't know what is "normal" but 1300 / sec sounds like a LOT! smbd is being a trooper though as it didn't drop one of them! Here is what top shows: last pid: 7417; load averages: 6.22, 6.27, 6. 39 processes: 7 running, 32 sleeping CPU: 4.0% user, 0.0% nice, 29.5% system, 1.4% interrupt, 65.0% idle Mem: 36M Active, 606M Inact, 183M Wired, 110M Buf, 162M Free Swap: 1902M Total, 1902M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 6848 root 1 66 0 14652K 8128K CPU0 2 33:00 30.37% smbd 1497 root 1 104 0 14600K 7224K RUN 1 34:35 0.00% smbd 863 root 1 107 0 14620K 7304K RUN 2 22:08 0.00% smbd 1408 root 1 104 0 14600K 7224K RUN 1 7:51 0.00% smbd 6552 root 1 101 0 14640K 7984K RUN 1 3:00 0.00% smbd 1401 root 1 104 0 14600K 7224K RUN 1 0:25 0.00% smbd 5628 root 1 44 0 8340K 5316K select 1 0:11 0.00% mc 756 root 1 44 0 4672K 2276K select 2 0:04 0.00% ntpd 7126 root 1 44 0 3496K 1748K CPU1 1 0:03 0.00% top 5588 root 1 44 0 8428K 3892K select 1 0:02 0.00% sshd 793 root 1 44 0 5876K 3444K select 0 0:02 0.00% sendmail 620 bind 7 4 0 27892K 22424K kqread 0 0:02 0.00% named 706 dhcpd 1 44 0 3128K 2040K select 1 0:01 0.00% dhcpd 6839 root 1 44 0 9540K 4360K select 0 0:01 0.00% nmbd 5630 root 1 8 0 4396K 2264K wait 1 0:01 0.00% bash 552 root 1 44 0 3184K 1228K select 0 0:00 0.00% syslogd 804 root 1 8 0 3212K 1272K nanslp 2 0:00 0.00% cron 5593 root 1 8 0 4396K 2260K wait 0 0:00 0.00% bash 797 smmsp 1 20 0 5876K 3232K pause 2 0:00 0.00% sendmail 6845 root 1 96 0 14428K 7804K select 1 0:00 0.00% smbd 847 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% getty 787 root 1 44 0 5752K 3528K select 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 846 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 1 0:00 0.00% getty 852 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% getty 851 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 2 0:00 0.00% getty 850 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 3 0:00 0.00% getty 849 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 1 0:00 0.00% getty 848 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 0 0:00 0.00% getty 824 root 1 96 0 3240K 1356K select 2 0:00 0.00% inetd 5543 root 1 5 0 3184K 1092K ttyin 1 0:00 0.00% getty 6847 root 1 96 0 14428K 7744K select 2 0:00 0.00% smbd 493 root 1 45 0 1888K 564K select 2 0:00 0.00% devd 147 root 1 20 0 1380K 804K pause 2 0:00 0.00% adjkerntz -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces@... [mailto:samba-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Matthew Dickinson Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:30 PM To: Jeremy Allison Cc: samba@... Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? Which got me to thinking: The thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112876.html In particular the last post http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/112929.html So... new config item: w2k client workaround = yes iff requested share does not exist, but a single share with the same name plus one character does exist, connect to that instead. Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Jeremy Allison
::
Rate this Message:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:52:30PM -0500, Brian wrote:
> Sorry I don't think so....basically as you can see in my earlier > post I tried a workaround by creating a share with the last character > clipped off (in my case "roo"). Great news, the attempt to connect msgs > are now gone, but my server is still being spammed > I did some stats on my client with a "net statistics workstation" > command and came up with: > > Bytes received 137,514 bytes/sec > Server Message Blocks (SMBs) received 1,302 SMB blocks/sec > Bytes transmitted 95,329 bytes/sec > Server Message Blocks (SMBs) transmitted 1,302 SMB blocks/sec > > So the error msgs are gone, but the server is getting spammed with > greater than 1000 SMB msg blocks per second while IDLE! I don't > know what is "normal" but 1300 / sec sounds like a LOT! > smbd is being a trooper though as it didn't drop one of them! > > > Here is what top shows: > > last pid: 7417; load averages: 6.22, 6.27, 6. > 39 processes: 7 running, 32 sleeping > CPU: 4.0% user, 0.0% nice, 29.5% system, 1.4% interrupt, 65.0% idle > Mem: 36M Active, 606M Inact, 183M Wired, 110M Buf, 162M Free > Swap: 1902M Total, 1902M Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 6848 root 1 66 0 14652K 8128K CPU0 2 33:00 30.37% smbd That's crazy. Collect a wireshark trace or up the smbd log to level 10 for a few seconds using smbcontrol and tell me what the client is doing to spam the server like that ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Brian-301
::
Rate this Message:
http://66.190.9.142/vista-spam-1.log
http://66.190.9.142/vista-spam-2.log Here is a few seconds worth in these two files. This is with the workaround in place where I have a "roo" share setup on the server so you will not see all those can't find service messages. I have not had time to look at them. Not sure if I could pick anything out of them or not. The more I investigate the more I am convinced it is a client issue.. Another interesting tidbit of information. Last night I setup a new account on the bsd box (non wheel account) and a matching account on the vista box (non administrator) and after a quick try last night it would appear the problem goes away (or had not started yet). I will duplicate that experiment to make sure. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra@...] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:54 AM To: Brian Cc: samba@... Subject: Re: [Samba] Lots of smbd processes and connections? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:52:30PM -0500, Brian wrote: > Sorry I don't think so....basically as you can see in my earlier > post I tried a workaround by creating a share with the last character > clipped off (in my case "roo"). Great news, the attempt to connect msgs > are now gone, but my server is still being spammed > I did some stats on my client with a "net statistics workstation" > command and came up with: > > Bytes received 137,514 bytes/sec > Server Message Blocks (SMBs) received 1,302 SMB blocks/sec > Bytes transmitted 95,329 bytes/sec > Server Message Blocks (SMBs) transmitted 1,302 SMB blocks/sec > > So the error msgs are gone, but the server is getting spammed with > greater than 1000 SMB msg blocks per second while IDLE! I don't > know what is "normal" but 1300 / sec sounds like a LOT! > smbd is being a trooper though as it didn't drop one of them! > > > Here is what top shows: > > last pid: 7417; load averages: 6.22, 6.27, 6. > 39 processes: 7 running, 32 sleeping > CPU: 4.0% user, 0.0% nice, 29.5% system, 1.4% interrupt, 65.0% idle > Mem: 36M Active, 606M Inact, 183M Wired, 110M Buf, 162M Free > Swap: 1902M Total, 1902M Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU > 6848 root 1 66 0 14652K 8128K CPU0 2 33:00 30.37% smbd That's crazy. Collect a wireshark trace or up the smbd log to level 10 for a few seconds using smbcontrol and tell me what the client is doing to spam the server like that ? Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Lots of smbd processes and connections?
by Jeremy Allison
::
Rate this Message:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:50:32PM -0500, Brian wrote:
> OK Progress, MAYBE!? > > I know my web server is inaccessible, but let's move on from that... > that is an issue for another day. > > At a log level 3, currently, I get the following sequence repeating > itself about 164 times per second. In that sequence it appears to > be closing 2 directories with incrementing fnum's > > So what is smbd/reply.c:reply_close(4343) close directory fnum=xxxx? > > that is about the only thing that changes besides the > transaction number. > > I'm not sure where the pattern starts/stop but the following is > CLEARLY repeating itself at a high rate of speed. Not enough detail. Get a log level 10 plus a wireshark trace please. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |
signature.asc (204 bytes) 
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
