|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
checksum addition to whiteclnt
by fr3akX
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Hello!
I'm using dccm with postfix, I know, that this is not recommended setup, but it works fine. Problem with postfix prequeue proxy filter is that it did not checks headers before passing to dccifd. My question is not related to this setup. I'm wondering what actions is required after checksum addition to white-clnt, is dccm restart required or there is some quicker way to reload whitelist? Thak You! _______________________________________________ DCC mailing list DCC@... http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc |
|
|
Re: checksum addition to whiteclnt
by Vernon Schryver
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ma-ris_Ruskulis?= <maris@...>
> I'm using dccm with postfix, I know, that this is not recommended setup, > but it works fine. On the contrary, I'm glad that works fine because using dccifd as a postfix before-queue filter *IS* one of the recommended configurations. That is why postfix before--queue filtering is the example in the dccifd man page in your copy of the DCC source or at http://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/dccifd.html#EXAMPLES > Problem with postfix prequeue proxy filter is that it > did not checks headers before passing to dccifd. Why is that a problem? Why not let postfix do DCC checks including SMTP headers before postfix does other checks? > My question is not > related to this setup. I'm wondering what actions is required after > checksum addition to white-clnt, is dccm restart required or there is > some quicker way to reload whitelist? If you are using dccifd as a Postfix before-queue filter, why and how are you also using dccm? Perhaps "dccm" was a typo for "dccifd." Changes to the main /var/dcc/whiteclnt file (or wherever you put the DCC home directory) and changes to per-user whiteclnt files are automatically noticed by dccifd, dccm, and dccproc (when dccproc is run with -w). Changes to files included in whiteclnt files are also automatically noticed. The most common causes of whiteclnt problems are: - ownership The DCC program such as dccifd must lock the file, and that requires that dccifd be able to write the file - locking Editors including `vi` on many UNIX like systems lock files. While you have the file visible in `vi`, dccifd will not be able to use it and dccifd will complain to the system log. Vernon Schryver vjs@... _______________________________________________ DCC mailing list DCC@... http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |