|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcAt first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that
I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in comparison. Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcTclCsound is an option, another is Python.
Victor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Redfern" <brianwredfern@...> To: <csound@...> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 6:31 PM Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc > At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that > I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it > performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook > pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run > Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound > library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight > enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its > fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is > pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in > comparison. > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > csound" Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcI've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article
on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> wrote: > Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. > > Regards, > Mike > > -----Original Message----- >>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> >>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM >>To: csound@... >>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc >> >>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that >>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it >>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook >>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run >>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound >>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight >>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its >>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is >>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in >>comparison. >> >> >>Send bugs reports to this list. >>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > > > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcHi Brian,
Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time it took to do so? I got: Elapsed time at end of performance: real: 9.220s, CPU: 9.221s on a WinXP machine, Core 2 duo T7300 @ 2ghz, 3gig ram. I'm curious to compare performance times, as there are certainly netbooks out there with larger SSD or HD sizes than what is on the EEE. Also, which EEE are you using? Thanks! steven On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote: > I've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article > on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also > interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up > using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do > live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's > running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> wrote: >> Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >>>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> >>>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM >>>To: csound@... >>>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc >>> >>>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that >>>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it >>>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook >>>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run >>>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound >>>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight >>>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its >>>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is >>>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in >>>comparison. >>> >>> >>>Send bugs reports to this list. >>>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >> >> >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >> > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcI'm using a 4 gig SD hd, that's why Java just fills it up, but ruby,
python, and tcl/tk take only a small amount of space in comparison. Its fast enough to run Blue, but I would need to get my csd.jar file from my other large machine. Using a 4 gig HD about 2 gigs goes for linux (with the nextstep ui) and then 2 gigs left for file storage. If I run java I wind up with only about 800 megs left for storage, Java is great but the JDK is getting huge for only 4 gigs total space. On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Steven Yi <stevenyi@...> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, > could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time > it took to do so? I got: > > Elapsed time at end of performance: real: 9.220s, CPU: 9.221s > > on a WinXP machine, Core 2 duo T7300 @ 2ghz, 3gig ram. > > I'm curious to compare performance times, as there are certainly > netbooks out there with larger SSD or HD sizes than what is on the > EEE. Also, which EEE are you using? > > Thanks! > steven > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote: >> I've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article >> on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also >> interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up >> using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do >> live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's >> running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. >> >> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> wrote: >>> Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mike >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> >>>>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM >>>>To: csound@... >>>>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc >>>> >>>>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that >>>>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it >>>>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook >>>>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run >>>>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound >>>>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight >>>>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its >>>>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is >>>>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in >>>>comparison. >>>> >>>> >>>>Send bugs reports to this list. >>>>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >>> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >> > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcIs this one of the models using Intel Atom? If it's the earlier 701
series and it's capable of running Java and blue, I'll be leaning towards getting one of the newer netbooks with Atom processor sometime then. =P As for Java, yeah, it's not the smallest, but I'm surprised it's taking up that much space. Anyways, thanks again for your report! On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote: > I'm using a 4 gig SD hd, that's why Java just fills it up, but ruby, > python, and tcl/tk take only a small amount of space in comparison. > Its fast enough to run Blue, but I would need to get my csd.jar file > from my other large machine. > > Using a 4 gig HD about 2 gigs goes for linux (with the nextstep ui) > and then 2 gigs left for file storage. If I run java I wind up with > only about 800 megs left for storage, Java is great but the JDK is > getting huge for only 4 gigs total space. > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Steven Yi <stevenyi@...> wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, >> could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time >> it took to do so? I got: >> >> Elapsed time at end of performance: real: 9.220s, CPU: 9.221s >> >> on a WinXP machine, Core 2 duo T7300 @ 2ghz, 3gig ram. >> >> I'm curious to compare performance times, as there are certainly >> netbooks out there with larger SSD or HD sizes than what is on the >> EEE. Also, which EEE are you using? >> >> Thanks! >> steven >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote: >>> I've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article >>> on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also >>> interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up >>> using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do >>> live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's >>> running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> wrote: >>>> Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> >>>>>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM >>>>>To: csound@... >>>>>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc >>>>> >>>>>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that >>>>>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it >>>>>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook >>>>>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run >>>>>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound >>>>>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight >>>>>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its >>>>>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is >>>>>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in >>>>>comparison. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Send bugs reports to this list. >>>>>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >>>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >>> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" >> > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcGiven that java is "compile-once, run everywhere", you should not need the
JDK, the JRE should be sufficient to run blue and csnd.jar. El 06/10/08 16:58 Brian Redfern escribió: > I'm using a 4 gig SD hd, that's why Java just fills it up, but ruby, > python, and tcl/tk take only a small amount of space in comparison. > Its fast enough to run Blue, but I would need to get my csd.jar file > from my other large machine. > > Using a 4 gig HD about 2 gigs goes for linux (with the nextstep ui) > and then 2 gigs left for file storage. If I run java I wind up with > only about 800 megs left for storage, Java is great but the JDK is > getting huge for only 4 gigs total space. > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Steven Yi <stevenyi@...> wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > > Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, > > could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time > > it took to do so? I got: > > > > Elapsed time at end of performance: real: 9.220s, CPU: 9.221s > > > > on a WinXP machine, Core 2 duo T7300 @ 2ghz, 3gig ram. > > > > I'm curious to compare performance times, as there are certainly > > netbooks out there with larger SSD or HD sizes than what is on the > > EEE. Also, which EEE are you using? > > > > Thanks! > > steven > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> > >> I've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article > >> on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also > >> interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up > >> using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do > >> live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's > >> running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> > >>> Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, > >>> and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Mike > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> > >>>>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> > >>>>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM > >>>>To: csound@... > >>>>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc > >>>> > >>>>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that > >>>>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it > >>>>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook > >>>>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run > >>>>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound > >>>>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight > >>>>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its > >>>>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is > >>>>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in > >>>>comparison. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Send bugs reports to this list. > >>>>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body > >>>> "unsubscribe csound" > >>> > >>> Send bugs reports to this list. > >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body > >>> "unsubscribe csound" > >> > >> Send bugs reports to this list. > >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > >> csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > > csound" > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > csound" Saludos, Felipe Sateler |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcYeah, not saying it can't run, but I need to compile Blue with
csnd.jar on another linux box and then copy those down to the eeepc, not enough space to build everything locally on the machine. On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler@...> wrote: > Given that java is "compile-once, run everywhere", you should not need the > JDK, the JRE should be sufficient to run blue and csnd.jar. > > El 06/10/08 16:58 Brian Redfern escribió: >> I'm using a 4 gig SD hd, that's why Java just fills it up, but ruby, >> python, and tcl/tk take only a small amount of space in comparison. >> Its fast enough to run Blue, but I would need to get my csd.jar file >> from my other large machine. >> >> Using a 4 gig HD about 2 gigs goes for linux (with the nextstep ui) >> and then 2 gigs left for file storage. If I run java I wind up with >> only about 800 megs left for storage, Java is great but the JDK is >> getting huge for only 4 gigs total space. >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Steven Yi <stevenyi@...> wrote: >> > Hi Brian, >> > >> > Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, >> > could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time >> > it took to do so? I got: >> > >> > Elapsed time at end of performance: real: 9.220s, CPU: 9.221s >> > >> > on a WinXP machine, Core 2 duo T7300 @ 2ghz, 3gig ram. >> > >> > I'm curious to compare performance times, as there are certainly >> > netbooks out there with larger SSD or HD sizes than what is on the >> > EEE. Also, which EEE are you using? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > steven >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> > wrote: >> >> I've got python on there, too. I'm reading the csound journal article >> >> on embedding python within a csd, but the tcl/tk interface is also >> >> interesting because it can do so much heavy lifting. I may wind up >> >> using tcltk to setup a csound server and then use python osc to do >> >> live coding music, just firing off osc events to the csd that's >> >> running and tcltk is just a small code to run the server. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Michael Gogins <gogins@...> > wrote: >> >>> Is there Python on this platform? That would be as powerful as Java, >> >>> and not much bigger than Tcl/Tk. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Mike >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> >> >>>>From: Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> >> >>>>Sent: Oct 4, 2008 1:31 PM >> >>>>To: csound@... >> >>>>Subject: [Csnd] csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc >> >>>> >> >>>>At first I was just excited to get csound on the eeepc, but now that >> >>>>I'm using it to run csound in realtime, I'm suprised by how well it >> >>>>performs given that this a much more limited system than my macbook >> >>>>pro or lenovo laptops. Its a little too limited on disk space to run >> >>>>Blue though, also its got a small screen. But I'm looking at tclCsound >> >>>>library to write a live coding interface in tcl/tk that's lightweight >> >>>>enough to run on the eeepc. I could put java and blue on here, its >> >>>>fast enough, but there wouldn't be much disk space left, java se is >> >>>>pretty huge these days, while tcl/tk is still very small in >> >>>>comparison. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>Send bugs reports to this list. >> >>>>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body >> >>>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >>> >> >>> Send bugs reports to this list. >> >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body >> >>> "unsubscribe csound" >> >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe >> >> csound" >> > >> > Send bugs reports to this list. >> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe >> > csound" >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe >> csound" > > > > Saludos, > Felipe Sateler > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc"Steven Yi" <stevenyi@...> writes:
> Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, > could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time > it took to do so? I got: On my eeepc 900 with 20Gb SSD, 8.9 Inch, Celeron 900MHz, 1gig ram: csound trapped.csd 20.12s user 0.82s system 98% cpu 21.159 total On my old laptop (celeron 1.40GHz, 2gig ram): csound trapped.csd 19.22s user 0.96s system 82% cpu 24.440 total Both run the arch linux distribution. Pedro Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcThis looks very good.
Victor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro "Kröger"" <kroger.lists@...> To: <csound@...> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:10 AM Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc > "Steven Yi" <stevenyi@...> writes: > >> Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, >> could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time >> it took to do so? I got: > > On my eeepc 900 with 20Gb SSD, 8.9 Inch, Celeron 900MHz, 1gig ram: > > csound trapped.csd 20.12s user 0.82s system 98% cpu 21.159 total > > On my old laptop (celeron 1.40GHz, 2gig ram): > > csound trapped.csd 19.22s user 0.96s system 82% cpu 24.440 total > > Both run the arch linux distribution. > > Pedro > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > csound" Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcYes! Thanks Pedro for reporting!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:59 AM, victor <Victor.Lazzarini@...> wrote: > This looks very good. > > Victor > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro "Kröger"" <kroger.lists@...> > To: <csound@...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:10 AM > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepc > > >> "Steven Yi" <stevenyi@...> writes: >> >>> Just wanted to say thanks for reporting your findings! As a test, >>> could you maybe render examples/trapped.csd to wav and report the time >>> it took to do so? I got: >> >> On my eeepc 900 with 20Gb SSD, 8.9 Inch, Celeron 900MHz, 1gig ram: >> >> csound trapped.csd 20.12s user 0.82s system 98% cpu 21.159 total >> >> On my old laptop (celeron 1.40GHz, 2gig ram): >> >> csound trapped.csd 19.22s user 0.96s system 82% cpu 24.440 total >> >> Both run the arch linux distribution. >> >> Pedro >> >> >> Send bugs reports to this list. >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe >> csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe > csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcMichael Gogins <gogins@...> writes:
> This is indeed interesting. I think I may get a small machine for > composing, that I can always take long. It's a pretty good machine, I recomend it. The keyboard is a little small but you can get used to it. I advise you not to buy the 700 series because the screen resolution is to small. The series I have came with 1gig RAM, but I think I can replace the memory with a 2gig. the linux that came with it is pretty good, but I prefer to use xmonad anyway, so I instaled arch linux over it. Finally, some crazy guys got linux to boot in 5 seconds in an eeepc: http://lwn.net/Articles/299483/ Cheers, Pedro Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: csound runs suprisingly well on the eeepcI use debian for eeepc, since I just apt-get csound. I couldn't figure
out how to install csound on the version of linux that came with the eeepc, but I like using nexstep for the desktop instead of gnome, since it only takes about 1 gig of disk space for openstep. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Pedro Kröger <kroger.lists@...> wrote: > Michael Gogins <gogins@...> writes: > >> This is indeed interesting. I think I may get a small machine for >> composing, that I can always take long. > > It's a pretty good machine, I recomend it. The keyboard is a little > small but you can get used to it. I advise you not to buy the 700 series > because the screen resolution is to small. The series I have came with > 1gig RAM, but I think I can replace the memory with a 2gig. the linux > that came with it is pretty good, but I prefer to use xmonad anyway, so > I instaled arch linux over it. Finally, some crazy guys got linux to > boot in 5 seconds in an eeepc: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/299483/ > > Cheers, > > Pedro > > > Send bugs reports to this list. > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound" |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |