|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
doubts regarding System Initialization working (SYSINIT)Hello all,
I have been browsing through the FreeBSD kernel's source code trying to understand its working . In the mi_startup() in /sys/kern/init_main.c all the SYSINIT objects are sorted using bubble sort and then they are executed in order. My doubt is that we have declared the pointer to the struct sysinit as const pointer to a const in the macro definition of SYSINIT ie when the macro SYSINIT(kmem, SI_SUB_KMEM, SI_ORDER_FIRST, kmeminit, NULL) is expanded completely we get the following static struct sysinit kmem_sys_init = { SI_SUB_KMEM, SI_ORDER_FIRST, (sysinit_cfunc_t)(sysinit_ nfunc_t)kmeminit, ((void *)(((void *)0))) }; static void const * const __set_sysinit_set_sym_kmem_sys_init __attribute__((__section__("set_" "sysinit_set"))) __attribute__((__used__)) = &kmem_sys_init; Here we see that the pointer is of type const and to a const but when we sort and swap using *sipp=*xipp; We are trying to change the address of const pointer to a new address in which case it should segfault but it works fine. Why does it not segfault it seems I have not understood the concept behind using const *const... I will be very thankful if you can help me with it. Regards, Mehul _______________________________________________ freebsd-ia32@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ia32 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ia32-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: doubts regarding System Initialization working (SYSINIT)On Friday 23 January 2009 10:55:32 am Mehul Chadha wrote:
> Hello all, > I have been browsing through the FreeBSD kernel's > source code trying to understand its working . > > In the mi_startup() in /sys/kern/init_main.c all the SYSINIT objects > are sorted using bubble sort and then they are executed in order. > > My doubt is that we have declared the pointer to the struct sysinit as > const pointer to a const in the macro definition of SYSINIT ie when > the macro > > SYSINIT(kmem, SI_SUB_KMEM, SI_ORDER_FIRST, kmeminit, NULL) is > expanded completely we get the following > > static struct sysinit kmem_sys_init = { SI_SUB_KMEM, SI_ORDER_FIRST, > (sysinit_cfunc_t)(sysinit_ > nfunc_t)kmeminit, ((void *)(((void *)0))) }; static void const * const > __set_sysinit_set_sym_kmem_sys_init __attribute__((__section__("set_" > "sysinit_set"))) __attribute__((__used__)) = &kmem_sys_init; > > Here we see that the pointer is of type const and to a const but when we > and swap using > *sipp=*xipp; > > We are trying to change the address of const pointer to a new address > in which case it should segfault but it works fine. > > Why does it not segfault it seems I have not understood the concept > behind using const *const... I will be very thankful if you can help > me with it. I'm guessing the startup code doesn't map the SYSINIT pages read only because it is not smart enough to honor that request perhaps. That is, I wouldn't be surprised if all of .rodata in the kernel was mapped as R/W instead of R/O. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-ia32@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ia32 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ia32-unsubscribe@..." |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |