dropping JDK 1.4 support: ReturnTypeResolverFactory

[Holger Brands]

Hey Jesse and James,

do we want to keep the
ReturnTypeResolverFactory-stuff used in
BeanProperty:

ReturnTypeResolver TYPE_RESOLVER =
  ReturnTypeResolverFactory.DEFAULT.createReturnTypeResolver();

or should I remove it and just do something like:

ReturnTypeResolver TYPE_RESOLVER = new J2SE50ReturnTypeResolver();

Thanks,
Holger

_______________________________________________________________________
Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt?
Jetzt absichern: https://homebanking.web.de/?mc=mail@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[Jesse Wilson]

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Holger Brands <hbrands@...> wrote:

or should I remove it and just do something like:
 ReturnTypeResolver TYPE_RESOLVER = new J2SE50ReturnTypeResolver();

I like this approach better. You might even consider dropping the interface, since now it only has one implementation.

[James Lemieux]

I second that emotion.

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Jesse Wilson <jesse@...> wrote:

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Holger Brands <hbrands@...> wrote:

or should I remove it and just do something like:
 ReturnTypeResolver TYPE_RESOLVER = new J2SE50ReturnTypeResolver();

I like this approach better. You might even consider dropping the interface, since now it only has one implementation.

[Holger Brands]

Ok, I deleted the obsolete classes and moved the remaining
from "impl.java15" to "impl.reflect".
For now, I left the interface in place.

Holger

>I second that emotion.
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Jesse Wilson <jesse@...> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Holger Brands <hbrands@...> wrote:
> or should I remove it and just do something like:
>  ReturnTypeResolver TYPE_RESOLVER = new J2SE50ReturnTypeResolver();
>
> I like this approach better. You might even consider dropping the
> interface, since now it only has one implementation.
>
>

____________________________________________________________________
Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...