On 2006-07-19 08:02:35 AM, Clive Crous wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> tile 225 "monster, yeti\, ape or other large beast, zruty"
> tile 400 "monster, yeti\, ape or other large beast, zruty"
>
> What are the implications of "fixing" this ?
>
> I mean besides the obvious 'tileset will change' issue.
> Is there any reason this duplication was left in there ?
>
> imho 225 should be removed.
It's there because the old entry for zruty in monst.c is commented out
rather than removed (you'll also find an entry in monsters.txt and
tilemap.c for the same reason). I see no reason why we couldn't just
remove all of these references in HEAD. Something may break, but that
just means we have to fix it. I wouldn't want to change 0.0.7 at this
point.
Hope this helps,
Ali.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV_______________________________________________
Slashem-devel mailing list
Slashem-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashem-devel