Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:01:11 -0400
> "Aryeh M. Friedman" <
aryeh.friedman@...> wrote:
>
>
>> We have a name server set up that contains all our static IP's (in
>> office but not for remote workers because they all have dynamic
>> IP's).... we currently use dns/no-ip2 to manage this but I was
>> wondering if it is possible to (easily) configure our internal
>> nameserver to do this?
>>
>
> This question is really more appropriate for -questions than
> -hackers. If you asked on -questions and didn't get an answer there or
> someone there pointed you here, you should let us know: it's always
> wise to indicate previous research.
>
> You also didn't say what you were using for your internal name server,
> which makes the matter of "easily" hard to answer. If you're a bind
> expert, it's easy. If you're not a bind expert but using bind, it
> probably isn't. Personally, I use dns/dnsmasq for such situations, as
> that's pretty much what it's designed to do. It's also very
> light-weight, sufficiently so that the various FOSS router builds
> include it.
>
> <mike
>
>
Thanks for attempting to help me find the right place to post but in my
experience -questions@ tends to be about "standard" usage not
"non-standard" usage questions thus I asked here... yes I am using BIND
(the base system one)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackersTo unsubscribe, send any mail to "
freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@..."
