Jim Whitehead has in the past suggested that looking into this may
be a good idea, but I don't think anyone has picked it up and run
with it yet. Seems to me like it might be interesting to try putting
something together; go for it!
Subversion isn't a good example, by the way; it basically
shoehorns it's needs into existing DAV specs rather than coming up
with something new, but CalDAV is a good example.
-wsv
On Jul 5, 2006, at 1:35 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> i'm interested in associating meta-data with emails stored in a
> central
> repository accessible from multiple clients. on day i'd like to be
> able
> to share my mails and meta-data over the internet.
>
> but this is brings me to IMAP. as a developer, IMAP sucks. IMAP really
> sucks. IMAP *really* sucks for so many reasons.
>
> it's a big, complex, obscure protocol. good secure server
> implementations are tough to code available only in a limit number of
> languages. it does too much. it's just not safely hackable.
>
> webDAV is cool. it's a modern hackable mashable protocol. running over
> http means security, scalability, caching and mirroring can be left to
> httpd. this is great if i want to share my email archives and meta-
> data
> over the internet. protocols have been successfully layered on top
> of it
> (subversion, calDAV for example). it strikes me as a good match for an
> IMAP alternative whose strength is read only performance and
> associating
> meta-data with emails.
>
> has it been done before? is this just a crazy idea?
>
> tell me why it won't work!
>
> - robert
