|
»
extending ftWatch to numeric and string
|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Tomek Kott
::
Rate this Message:
Hi All,
I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with the displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string) was quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a boolean field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not depending on the boolean value: <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) AND structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") AND isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) AND NOT arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > <cfset html=""/> <cfelse> <cfset html = super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> </cfif> And similar for display function. Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any ideas on that? Tomek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Tomek Kott
::
Rate this Message:
http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example
quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. Tomek
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.spam@...> wrote: Hi All, --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Tomek Kott
::
Rate this Message:
already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the boolean. Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up as well) is here:
http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example Tomek On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.spam@...> wrote: http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Marco van den Oever
::
Rate this Message:
Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the boolean. > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up as > well) is here: > > http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > Tomek > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > Tomek > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with the > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string) was > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a boolean > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not depending on > >> the boolean value: > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > >> AND > >> structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > >> AND > >> isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > >> AND NOT > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > >> <cfset html=""/> > >> <cfelse> > >> <cfset html = super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > >> </cfif> > > >> And similar for display function. > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any ideas on > >> that? > > >> Tomek > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Marco van den Oever
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Tomek, i replied on: http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments... On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the boolean. > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up as > > well) is here: > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > Tomek > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > > Tomek > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with the > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string) was > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a boolean > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not depending on > > >> the boolean value: > > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > > >> AND > > >> structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > > >> AND > > >> isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > > >> AND NOT > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > > >> <cfset html=""/> > > >> <cfelse> > > >> <cfset html = super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > > >> </cfif> > > > >> And similar for display function. > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any ideas on > > >> that? > > > >> Tomek > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Tomek Kott
::
Rate this Message:
Marco,
Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 now caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then it should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies in ftSeq. To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test? Tomek On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoever@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Marco van den Oever
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Tomek it works now, awesome :) On Jun 22, 3:37 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > Marco, > > Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 now > caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then it > should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies in > ftSeq. > > To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test? > > Tomek > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > > > Hi Tomek, i replied on: > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments... > > > On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> > > wrote: > > > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) > > > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the > > boolean. > > > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up > > as > > > > well) is here: > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > Tomek > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> > > wrote: > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi All, > > > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with > > the > > > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string) > > was > > > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and > > > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a > > boolean > > > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not > > depending on > > > > >> the boolean value: > > > > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and > > > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > > > > >> AND > > > structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > > > > >> AND > > > isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > > > > >> AND NOT > > > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > > > > >> <cfset html=""/> > > > > >> <cfelse> > > > > >> <cfset html = > > super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > > > > >> </cfif> > > > > > >> And similar for display function. > > > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any > > ideas on > > > > >> that? > > > > > >> Tomek > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Marco van den Oever
::
Rate this Message:
What i do notice is when you start without the optional field, then activate it by checking selectbox, the validation "this is a required field" is not showing while click submit and fill in no value, when i start with checkbox selected, so also the field, then it works. Is there something i need to change or is this an improvement feature i should add? On Jun 22, 8:03 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > Hi Tomek it works now, awesome :) > > On Jun 22, 3:37 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > Marco, > > > Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 now > > caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then it > > should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies in > > ftSeq. > > > To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test? > > > Tomek > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > > marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > > > > Hi Tomek, i replied on: > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments... > > > > On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> > > > wrote: > > > > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) > > > > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the > > > boolean. > > > > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up > > > as > > > > > well) is here: > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> > > > wrote: > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Hi All, > > > > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with > > > the > > > > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, string) > > > was > > > > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here (and > > > > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether a > > > boolean > > > > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not > > > depending on > > > > > >> the boolean value: > > > > > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and > > > > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > > > > > >> AND > > > > structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > > > > > >> AND > > > > isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > > > > > >> AND NOT > > > > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > > > > > >> <cfset html=""/> > > > > > >> <cfelse> > > > > > >> <cfset html = > > > super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > > > > > >> </cfif> > > > > > > >> And similar for display function. > > > > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any > > > ideas on > > > > > >> that? > > > > > > >> Tomek > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Tomek Kott
::
Rate this Message:
for my situation this was not a problem and so I never worried about it. If you figure out a way around it, by all means add another section to the wiki.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoever@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: extending ftWatch to numeric and string
by Marco van den Oever
::
Rate this Message:
Although i think you have more experience and insight in these kind of stuff, of course when i find a way of solving i will ad it to the wiki. Thanks :) On Jun 22, 9:45 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > for my situation this was not a problem and so I never worried about it. If > you figure out a way around it, by all means add another section to the > wiki. > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > > > What i do notice is when you start without the optional field, then > > activate it by checking selectbox, the validation "this is a required > > field" is not showing while click submit and fill in no value, when i > > start with checkbox selected, so also the field, then it works. > > > Is there something i need to change or is this an improvement feature > > i should add? > > > On Jun 22, 8:03 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> > > wrote: > > > Hi Tomek it works now, awesome :) > > > > On Jun 22, 3:37 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > > > Marco, > > > > > Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 > > now > > > > caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then > > it > > > > should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies > > in > > > > ftSeq. > > > > > To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test? > > > > > Tomek > > > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > > > > marcovandenoe...@...> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tomek, i replied on: > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments... > > > > > > On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <marcovandenoe...@...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <tkott.s...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for > > the > > > > > boolean. > > > > > > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label > > showing up > > > > > as > > > > > > > well) is here: > > > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott < > > tkott.s...@...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott < > > tkott.s...@...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hi All, > > > > > > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, > > string) > > > > > was > > > > > > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it > > here (and > > > > > > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking > > whether a > > > > > boolean > > > > > > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not > > > > > depending on > > > > > > > >> the boolean value: > > > > > > > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") > > and > > > > > > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > > > > > > > >> AND > > > structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > > > > > > > >> AND > > > isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > > > > > > > >> AND NOT > > > > > > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > > > > > > > >> <cfset html=""/> > > > > > > > >> <cfelse> > > > > > > > >> <cfset html = > > > > > super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > > > > > > > >> </cfif> > > > > > > > > >> And similar for display function. > > > > > > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as > > well...any > > > > > ideas on > > > > > > > >> that? > > > > > > > > >> Tomek > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: farcry-dev@... To unsubscribe, email: farcry-dev+unsubscribe@... For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
