|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
fglrx vs. radeonOk I got today around of a lot of my trouble.
I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable better show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on opengl (enemy territory and metin2 (wine)), working suspend 2ram and 2disk. All this with kde4 effects enabled and I could unplug the powercord at any moment ;) So it seems that there is something evil between my planar and the fglrx. But this makes sure that I will never get the real reasons for those troubles, because I won't do a day work to get my system back to fglrx. So I think Henrique is right there is something bad with this box (fglrx works fine for others I hope), but it does something really different as the xorg stuff and that seems to break my box. Ok, for me it works with radeon, the rest, a bit they have fixed before I got the box back, so my hope is that the evil ghost will sleep in a dark corner of this box until I could replace it with a Calpella based one. So my outcome is don't use fglrx it multiplies any trouble already in your box. Florian |
|
|
Re: fglrx vs. radeonExcellent. Which thinkpad? Which versions of X and radeon?
Florian Manschwetus wrote: > Ok I got today around of a lot of my trouble. > I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable better > show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on opengl > (enemy territory and metin2 (wine)), working suspend 2ram and 2disk. All > this with kde4 effects enabled and I could unplug the powercord at any > moment ;) > So it seems that there is something evil between my planar and the > fglrx. But this makes sure that I will never get the real reasons for > those troubles, because I won't do a day work to get my system back to > fglrx. > > So I think Henrique is right there is something bad with this box (fglrx > works fine for others I hope), but it does something really different as > the xorg stuff and that seems to break my box. > > Ok, for me it works with radeon, the rest, a bit they have fixed before > I got the box back, so my hope is that the evil ghost will sleep in a > dark corner of this box until I could replace it with a Calpella based one. > > So my outcome is don't use fglrx it multiplies any trouble already in > your box. > > Florian > The linux-thinkpad mailing list home page is at: http://mailman.linux-thinkpad.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-thinkpad |
|
|
Re: fglrx vs. radeonT60 with x1400 (just the lenovo warranty thread).
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati Available versions: 6.6.3 6.8.0-r1 (~)6.9.0 (~)6.10.0 (~)6.11.0 6.12.1-r1 (~)6.12.2 (~)6.12.2-r1 {debug} Installed versions: 6.12.2-r1(18:28:58 06.08.2009)(-debug) Homepage: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/ Description: ATI video driver x11-base/xorg-server Available versions: [M]1.3.0.0-r6 (~)1.4-r2[1] [M](~)1.4.2 1.5.3-r6 (~)1.5.3-r7 (~)1.6.2.901 (~)1.6.3 {3dfx debug dmx dri hal ... video_cards_xgi xorg xprint} Installed versions: 1.6.3(14:36:24 06.08.2009)(hal ... -video_cards_voodoo -video_cards_xgi) Homepage: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/ Description: X.Org X servers Florian Am 07.08.2009 12:28, schrieb D. Sen: > Excellent. Which thinkpad? Which versions of X and radeon? > > Florian Manschwetus wrote: >> Ok I got today around of a lot of my trouble. >> I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable >> better show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on >> opengl (enemy territory and metin2 (wine)), working suspend 2ram and >> 2disk. All this with kde4 effects enabled and I could unplug the >> powercord at any moment ;) >> So it seems that there is something evil between my planar and the >> fglrx. But this makes sure that I will never get the real reasons for >> those troubles, because I won't do a day work to get my system back to >> fglrx. >> >> So I think Henrique is right there is something bad with this box >> (fglrx works fine for others I hope), but it does something really >> different as the xorg stuff and that seems to break my box. >> >> Ok, for me it works with radeon, the rest, a bit they have fixed >> before I got the box back, so my hope is that the evil ghost will >> sleep in a dark corner of this box until I could replace it with a >> Calpella based one. >> >> So my outcome is don't use fglrx it multiplies any trouble already in >> your box. >> >> Florian >> |
|
|
Re: fglrx vs. radeonhdFlorian Manschwetus wrote:
> Ok I got today around of a lot of my trouble. > I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable better > show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on opengl It also works well with the radeonhd driver with 3D enabled, v1.2.5 or later. I've been using it for some time and have all the benefits you listed with a smaller memory footprint (still have Xorg sucking-all-memory problem though). Suspend never worked will with fglrx for me, hit-or-miss. The radeonhs driver has been much more stable for me on a T60p. Incidentally, I must have a first-gen T60p since I've only had one problem, failing hard disk a few months before the 3yr warranty was up. Replaced using advance-replacement and the hd sled for the ultrabay to copy everything over. Regards, Mike -- Michael Milligan -> milli@... -- The linux-thinkpad mailing list home page is at: http://mailman.linux-thinkpad.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-thinkpad |
|
|
Re: fglrx vs. radeonhdAm 17.08.2009 14:58, schrieb Michael Milligan:
> Florian Manschwetus wrote: >> Ok I got today around of a lot of my trouble. >> I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable better >> show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on opengl > > It also works well with the radeonhd driver with 3D enabled, v1.2.5 or > later. I've been using it for some time and have all the benefits you > listed with a smaller memory footprint (still have Xorg > sucking-all-memory problem though). Suspend never worked will with > fglrx for me, hit-or-miss. The radeonhs driver has been much more > stable for me on a T60p. > > Incidentally, I must have a first-gen T60p since I've only had one > problem, failing hard disk a few months before the 3yr warranty was up. > Replaced using advance-replacement and the hd sled for the ultrabay to > copy everything over. Florian |
|
|
Re: fglrx vs. radeonhdFlorian Manschwetus wrote:
> Am 17.08.2009 14:58, schrieb Michael Milligan: >> Florian Manschwetus wrote: >>> Ok I got today around of a lot of my trouble. >>> I switched from fglrx to radeon getting all around a unbelievable better >>> show. Better and faster rendering of h264 videos, more speed on opengl >> >> It also works well with the radeonhd driver with 3D enabled, v1.2.5 or >> later. I've been using it for some time and have all the benefits you >> listed with a smaller memory footprint (still have Xorg >> sucking-all-memory problem though). Suspend never worked will with >> fglrx for me, hit-or-miss. The radeonhs driver has been much more >> stable for me on a T60p. >> >> Incidentally, I must have a first-gen T60p since I've only had one >> problem, failing hard disk a few months before the 3yr warranty was up. >> Replaced using advance-replacement and the hd sled for the ultrabay to >> copy everything over. > Is it a CoreDuo or a Core2Duo, that is the only real diffrence afaik > between first and second generation. It's a Core Duo... T2600. Regards, Mike -- Michael Milligan -> milli@... -- The linux-thinkpad mailing list home page is at: http://mailman.linux-thinkpad.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-thinkpad |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |