Nabble - firebird-test

Re: Firebird against SQLite

2009-10-27T02:01:34Z

Firebird-Test is not the appropriate list for this question. Either repost on Firebird-Support or on a list specific for your language. See http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=lists for an overview of mailinglists.

Regards,
Mark

>
> Hi List,
> I am newbie to Fire bird. Off recently, I worked on Integrating
> SQLite as a Database Engine for my Application. Now, I am trying to find
> if
> Fire Bird can fit in it's place.
> Also, I have integrated the IBPP wrappers into my application, but, I was
> not able to get a simple example that i could use as a reference for me.
> Any help in these regards will be highly appreciated,
> Regards,
> Atul

--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Firebird against SQLite

2009-10-22T04:10:18Z

Hi List,
I am newbie to Fire bird. Off recently, I worked on Integrating
SQLite as a Database Engine for my Application. Now, I am trying to find if
Fire Bird can fit in it's place.
Also, I have integrated the IBPP wrappers into my application, but, I was
not able to get a simple example that i could use as a reference for me.
Any help in these regards will be highly appreciated,
Regards,
Atul

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firebird-against-SQLite-tp26008142p26008142.html
Sent from the firebird-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-29T07:03:40Z

Philippe Makowski wrote:

> Roman Simakov [08-12-20 11.20] :
>
>> A small correction ;) I just committed the tests since i have necessary
>> rights but Vyacheslav Ozherelyev (vyacheslav.ozherelev@...) is
>> a real developer of them :)
>>
> yes sorry
>
>
>> He can answer you about they. Red Soft has many changes of source code
>> and will provide a set of patches for firebird v3.0. Some of them
>> already discussed and probably will be merged into cvs tree after
>> branching 2.5. As well as core patches Red Soft provides a set of
>> qm-tests for new functionality. Vyacheslav is responsible for it and he
>> is ready to tell you about exists tests.
>>
>>
> Are they all for 3.0 ? or is there some for 2.5 ?
>

Yes, all for 3.0
> We will have two French students that will help us for Q/A, so we have to tell them what
> kind of tests we need.
>
>

Regards
Vyacheslav Ozherelyev

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-29T06:53:58Z

Roman Simakov [08-12-20 11.20] :
> A small correction ;) I just committed the tests since i have necessary
> rights but Vyacheslav Ozherelyev (vyacheslav.ozherelev@...) is
> a real developer of them :)
yes sorry

> He can answer you about they. Red Soft has many changes of source code
> and will provide a set of patches for firebird v3.0. Some of them
> already discussed and probably will be merged into cvs tree after
> branching 2.5. As well as core patches Red Soft provides a set of
> qm-tests for new functionality. Vyacheslav is responsible for it and he
> is ready to tell you about exists tests.
>
Are they all for 3.0 ? or is there some for 2.5 ?

We will have two French students that will help us for Q/A, so we have to tell them what
kind of tests we need.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Fb250

2008-12-21T01:04:23Z

Hi Philippe

On 20/12/08 20:36, Philippe Makowski wrote:
>>
> SuperServer 32 ?
>

That was Classic Server 32 bit.

>
> You should not have ERROR, there is something wrong on your setup
>

Yes, I will look at these.

> Yes, all of that have to be carefully check , there are still fals FAIL (ODS change for
> example) but as I said, Alpha stage is not a good one for that.
>

Yes I understand, my usually experience is running these all the time,
and with bug fixes, having the developers closely involved in writing
the test scripts.

> And now, I have some work to do with 2.1.2 (58 bugs fixed to check)
>

Ok, I will post what I find as I look through the fails, and presumably
that will help update the test results when needed.

Thanks for the help!

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-20T02:20:54Z

Philippe Makowski wrote:
> dev resolve bug, Q/A team test if it is really solved, close the bug and if possible
> create the qmtest test.
> So, Pavel and I, with sometime help from french students (and recently Roman Simakov from
> Red Soft committed tests for FK) are the one that do the job.
>
>
Hi Philippe, All!

A small correction ;) I just committed the tests since i have necessary
rights but Vyacheslav Ozherelyev (vyacheslav.ozherelev@...) is
a real developer of them :)
He can answer you about they. Red Soft has many changes of source code
and will provide a set of patches for firebird v3.0. Some of them
already discussed and probably will be merged into cvs tree after
branching 2.5. As well as core patches Red Soft provides a set of
qm-tests for new functionality. Vyacheslav is responsible for it and he
is ready to tell you about exists tests.

Roman Simakov

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Fb250

2008-12-20T01:36:07Z

Mark O'Donohue [08-12-20 01.53] :
> Just for comparison, I have updated my copy to the latest svn copy and
> running on linux, and running the two sets separately I get:
>
SuperServer 32 ?

> functional:
> --- STATISTICS ----------------------------------------
>
> 490 tests total
> 1 ( 0%) tests ERROR
> 51 ( 10%) tests FAIL
> 438 ( 89%) tests PASS
>
>
I get this :
--- STATISTICS ---------------------------------------------------------------

490 tests total
47 ( 10%) tests FAIL
443 ( 90%) tests PASS

>
> For the bugs subset :
> --- STATISTICS ----------------------------------------
>
> 139 tests total
> 12 ( 9%) tests ERROR
> 21 ( 15%) tests FAIL
> 106 ( 76%) tests PASS
>
>

I get this
--- STATISTICS ---------------------------------------------------------------

139 tests total
15 ( 11%) tests FAIL
124 ( 89%) tests PASS

You should not have ERROR, there is something wrong on your setup

> I am yet to look into the fails, but two I did seemed cases where the
> result comparison set needed to be updated.
>
Yes, all of that have to be carefully check , there are still fals FAIL (ODS change for
example) but as I said, Alpha stage is not a good one for that.

And now, I have some work to do with 2.1.2 (58 bugs fixed to check)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Fb250

2008-12-19T16:53:36Z

Hi Philippe

On 16/12/08 02:20, Philippe Makowski wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I committed today new version of tests to avoid false fail related to the change from
> SQLCODE to SQLSTATE.
>
> Results are more clean now for 2.5, there is still some cleaning to do, but for I now I
> prefer to let them, at least to not hide changes that occurred with new ods, new functions ...
>
> with the new version there is still 41 FAIL on 625 tests under Windows, but that's really
> better than before the cleaning ;)
> At least results can be exploited now without too much noise with false fail.
>

Just for comparison, I have updated my copy to the latest svn copy and
running on linux, and running the two sets separately I get:

functional:
--- STATISTICS ----------------------------------------

490 tests total
1 ( 0%) tests ERROR
51 ( 10%) tests FAIL
438 ( 89%) tests PASS

For the bugs subset :
--- STATISTICS ----------------------------------------

139 tests total
12 ( 9%) tests ERROR
21 ( 15%) tests FAIL
106 ( 76%) tests PASS

I am yet to look into the fails, but two I did seemed cases where the
result comparison set needed to be updated.

I will also try and run the older TCS suite.

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Fb250

2008-12-15T07:20:08Z

Hi all,

I committed today new version of tests to avoid false fail related to the change from
SQLCODE to SQLSTATE.

Results are more clean now for 2.5, there is still some cleaning to do, but for I now I
prefer to let them, at least to not hide changes that occurred with new ods, new functions ...

with the new version there is still 41 FAIL on 625 tests under Windows, but that's really
better than before the cleaning ;)
At least results can be exploited now without too much noise with false fail.

--
Philippe Makowski
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Tel +33 (0) 561058813

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-14T02:11:16Z

Mark,
> I reran functional.intfunc.cast.cast_01 and it worked, the ERROR was
> that the database already existed, but knowing I am in the ballpark I've
> moved on to trying to run against my 2.5 build.
you will have a lot of fail tests, since 2.5 change error codes

> Once the report is created, is it posted somewhere, or put on the website?
>
no
Pavel have all, and send them to dev if need.

> But I am curious as to who is responsible for building the test case for
> each bug (the usual process is to dob in either the reporter or the
> developer as the bunny)?
>
dev resolve bug, Q/A team test if it is really solved, close the bug and if possible
create the qmtest test.
So, Pavel and I, with sometime help from french students (and recently Roman Simakov from
Red Soft committed tests for FK) are the one that do the job.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-13T20:32:38Z

Hi Phillippe

On 14/12/08 02:46, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Mark O'Donohue [08-12-13 15.10] :
>> So it seems for fb 2.0.4 (linux) we have 402 (358 + 44 ) test cases, is
>> that correct or are there more somewhere else?
>>
> Classic or SuperServer ?
>

That was super.

Thanks for those, its nice to be getting similar answers :-)

I reran functional.intfunc.cast.cast_01 and it worked, the ERROR was
that the database already existed, but knowing I am in the ballpark I've
moved on to trying to run against my 2.5 build.

>
> there is no public place where you could find results, Pavel and I run tests, and after
> that we create a report with all results files using the
> qmreport python script you can find in the svn

Once the report is created, is it posted somewhere, or put on the website?

Also with the bugs test suite, we seem to have a variety of tests from
core_86.qmt ... core_1885.qmt, but tracker seems to be up to bug
core-2238. There seems to be a mix of information available in
tracker, most of it helpful for building the test case.

But I am curious as to who is responsible for building the test case for
each bug (the usual process is to dob in either the reporter or the
developer as the bunny)?

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-13T07:46:10Z

Mark O'Donohue [08-12-13 15.10] :
> So it seems for fb 2.0.4 (linux) we have 402 (358 + 44 ) test cases, is
> that correct or are there more somewhere else?
>
Classic or SuperServer ?

>
> functional.arno.optimizer.opt_multi_index_selection_06: FAIL
> Expected standard output from ISQL does not match actual output.
>
> functional.arno.optimizer.opt_single_index_selection_11: FAIL
> Expected standard output from ISQL does not match actual output.
>
These two are true bugs, so it is normal that they fail

> functional.intfunc.cast.cast_01 : ERROR
> Exception raised while creating database.
this one should pass
before running test, check that you don't have databases in your "database_location" directory

>
> bugs.core_1006 : ERROR
> Backup file core1006.fbk does not exist.
>
> bugs.core_1063 : ERROR
> Backup file core1063.fbk does not exist.
>
these two should pass
check your "backup_location" directory and check also that firebird user can read files

> bugs.core_1331 : FAIL
> Expected STDERR stream received from ISQL.
>
this one "officialy" fail, it is a charset problem with qmtest

> bugs.core_959 : FAIL
> Expected standard output from python does not match actual output.
>
This one I allways have trouble to run it with Superserver, but not with Classic
but it is a qmtest problem

so not far from the "official" results

there is no public place where you could find results, Pavel and I run tests, and after
that we create a report with all results files using the
qmreport python script you can find in the svn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

results of qmtest run on linux fb2.0.4

2008-12-13T06:10:35Z

So it seems for fb 2.0.4 (linux) we have 402 (358 + 44 ) test cases, is
that correct or are there more somewhere else?

$qmtest -C context.txt run functional

--- STATISTICS
---------------------------------------------------------------

358 tests total
1 ( 0%) tests ERROR
2 ( 1%) tests FAIL
355 ( 99%) tests PASS

$qmtest -C context.txt run bugs

--- STATISTICS
---------------------------------------------------------------

44 tests total
2 ( 5%) tests ERROR
2 ( 5%) tests FAIL
40 ( 91%) tests PASS

I re-ran one of the FAILS and it worked the second time (database
already existed was the cause). Is there an official list of results I
can check to see how these compare?

Cheers - Mark

Below are the ones that failed.

--- TESTS THAT DID NOT PASS
--------------------------------------------------

functional.arno.optimizer.opt_multi_index_selection_06: FAIL
Expected standard output from ISQL does not match actual output.

functional.arno.optimizer.opt_single_index_selection_11: FAIL
Expected standard output from ISQL does not match actual output.

functional.intfunc.cast.cast_01 : ERROR
Exception raised while creating database.

--- TESTS THAT DID NOT PASS
--------------------------------------------------

bugs.core_1006 : ERROR
Backup file core1006.fbk does not exist.

bugs.core_1063 : ERROR
Backup file core1063.fbk does not exist.

bugs.core_1331 : FAIL
Expected STDERR stream received from ISQL.

bugs.core_959 : FAIL
Expected standard output from python does not match actual output.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-13T02:56:41Z

Hi Pavel

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Pavel Cisar <pcisar@...> wrote:
>
> Now I realized that you may use wrong (outdated) version of qmtest, if
> you downloaded qmtest from original site. It doesn't contain recent
> patches and might have trouble with Python 2.5.
>
> Please download this version and try again
> http://www.firebirdsql.org/download/prerelease/python/qmtest-2.4.1070.tar.gz
>

Thanks, I will use that, I am on qmtest 2.4, but probably that is a
later build. But for this problem I am 100% sure it was editline,
starting with :

http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/editline.html

and linking their own test program with Ubuntu provided libraries, and
then building the ones in the package, I got the same error, entirely
without firebird or qmtest.

Now, to download a version from our website, and will start Today over
again ....

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-13T02:39:23Z

Hi Mark,

Mark O'Donohue napsal(a):

> Hi Pavel
>
> Thanks for the tip, I have got further, but now I am getting groups of
> failed tests.
>
> I am running against the standard ubuntu fb2.0.3 package install,
>
> $qmtest run -C context.txt functional
>
> gives:
> --- STATISTICS --------------------------------
>
> 358 tests total
> 88 ( 25%) tests FAIL
> 270 ( 75%) tests PASS
>
>
> 88 failures seems a little high. Looking at the first failure, which is
>
>
> test case: functional.arno.derived_tables.derived_tables_06
>
> That test is:
>
> SELECT
> dt.*
> FROM
> Table_10 t10
> JOIN (SELECT * FROM Table_10 t2 WHERE t2.ID = t10.ID)
> dt ON (1 = 1);
>
> When I ran that test using isql it gives the "Column Unknown: T10.ID" as
> expected.
>
>
> The QMTest result complained it found an extra "=":
>
> -Token unknown - line 5, column 2
> -=
>
> So QMTest has an extra "=" inserted somewhere.
>
> So any idea of what is going wrong (I have included more details below) ?

Now I realized that you may use wrong (outdated) version of qmtest, if
you downloaded qmtest from original site. It doesn't contain recent
patches and might have trouble with Python 2.5.

Please download this version and try again
http://www.firebirdsql.org/download/prerelease/python/qmtest-2.4.1070.tar.gz

There is also a Windows installer if you want to run it under Windows too.

best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-13T02:38:16Z

I found the problem, and Helen will give me an i-told-you-so for it I am
sure!

It seemed that any test with lines > 64 characters in length fails.

even a:

/usr/bin/isql-fb < test.sql

will ignore the first 64 characters for lines that are longer than 64
characters - this is a problem with the libeditline provided in Unbuntu
(and Debian).

Mind you it took a bit of digging though and looking at the internals of
qmtest and fbqa.py before I figured that out.

The bug doesnt occur in our older localized version of libeditline.
There isnt any reported bug for Debian or Ubuntu but someone fixed
something similar on minix-editline. So I created a bug report for Unbuntu.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/editline/+bug/307652

Then having gone that far, it wasn't too hard then to then give them a
patch to fix is as well.

Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Mark,
>> And the actual test ran fine, when I did it by hand.
>>
> and what result if you run only one test, for example
> $qmtest run -C context.txt functional.arno.derived_tables.derived_tables_06
>

yep, I was doing that, and comparing out put to one that worked, then I
added some code within FirebirdTest to debug what was actually sent
through to isql, since it does several substitutions to the input.
Finally when dumping and comparing stdin/stderr/stdout for a working and
non-working cases, I tried the line length.

Anyway, a side effect is I've added some debugging code that will with a
switch print the SQL code, used for setup and execution when you run the
tests.

Now where was I...

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-13T01:06:43Z

Mark,
> And the actual test ran fine, when I did it by hand.
>
and what result if you run only one test, for example
$qmtest run -C context.txt functional.arno.derived_tables.derived_tables_06

?

may be you have a qmtest problem
which version are you using ?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-12T19:56:19Z

Hi Helen

Helen Borrie wrote:
> Mark,
>
>>
>> I am running against the standard ubuntu fb2.0.3 package install,
>
> Wouldn't you do better installing and testing with the official
> project distro, so that you actually know what you're working with?
>

Careful, Helen they will hear you :-).

The they in debian in terms of who maintains the packages there is
generally us; at least thats my take from what I read in
pkg-firebird-general; and packaging within constrains imposed on you
ain't easy.

Besides what is wrong with a package name of firebird2_1.5.3 :-).

However, my general aim is to test "my" build, but to do that I wanted
to run a base test set for reference.

The Ubuntu 2.0.3 firebird looks legit it reports:

$ isql-fb -z
ISQL Version: LI-V2.0.3.12981 Firebird 2.0
Use CONNECT or CREATE DATABASE to specify a database
SQL>

And the actual test ran fine, when I did it by hand.

So I actually suspect some trickery in qmtest. It would be nice to be
able to get in and trace it a little better - bring back DECTest thats
what I say :-).

Cheers - Mark

.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-12T19:09:38Z

Mark,

At 01:36 PM 13/12/2008, you wrote:

>Hi Pavel
>
>Thanks for the tip, I have got further, but now I am getting groups of
>failed tests.
>
>I am running against the standard ubuntu fb2.0.3 package install,

Wouldn't you do better installing and testing with the official project distro, so that you actually know what you're working with? Ubuntu's stuff comes from Debian and Debian was calling Firebird 1.5 "Firebird 2" for a long time, possibly still is...

> $qmtest run -C context.txt functional
>
>gives:
> --- STATISTICS --------------------------------
>
> 358 tests total
> 88 ( 25%) tests FAIL
> 270 ( 75%) tests PASS
>
>
>88 failures seems a little high.

Firebird 1.5 (posing as Firebird 2) wouldn't pass any tests set up to test new language features in (the real) Firebird 2.0.

Just a thought...on the opposite side of the coin, at least you might be able to demonstrate how much up the creek the Debian/Firebird situation has been at defined points in its evolution. ;-)

Helen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-12T18:36:53Z

Hi Pavel

Thanks for the tip, I have got further, but now I am getting groups of
failed tests.

I am running against the standard ubuntu fb2.0.3 package install,

$qmtest run -C context.txt functional

gives:
--- STATISTICS --------------------------------

358 tests total
88 ( 25%) tests FAIL
270 ( 75%) tests PASS

88 failures seems a little high. Looking at the first failure, which is

test case: functional.arno.derived_tables.derived_tables_06

That test is:

SELECT
dt.*
FROM
Table_10 t10
JOIN (SELECT * FROM Table_10 t2 WHERE t2.ID = t10.ID)
dt ON (1 = 1);

When I ran that test using isql it gives the "Column Unknown: T10.ID" as
expected.

The QMTest result complained it found an extra "=":

-Token unknown - line 5, column 2
-=

So QMTest has an extra "=" inserted somewhere.

So any idea of what is going wrong (I have included more details below) ?

Cheers - Mark

Setup is :

./qadbm.py
QADBM>platform Linux
QADBM>target 2.0.3
QADBM>create fbtest2.0.3
QADBM>copy fbtest2.0.3
QADBM>exit

I create a context.txt file for ubuntu/2.0.3 as :

temp_directory=/var/tmp/
server_location=localhost:
database_location=/var/firebird/test/

suite_database_location=/home/odonohue/work/firebird/testing/qa/qa/trunk/testsuite/fdb/
backup_location=/home/odonohue/work/firebird/testing/qa/qa/trunk/testsuite/fdk/
files_location=/home/odonohue/work/firebird/testing/qa/qa/trunk/testsuite/files/
isc4_path=/var/lib/firebird/2.0/system/security2.fdb
user_name=SYSDBA
user_password=<a secret noone will ever guess>
isql_path=/usr/bin/isql-fb
gsec_path=/usr/bin/gsec
gstat_path=/usr/bin/gstat
gbak_path=/usr/bin/gbak
nbackup_path=/usr/bin/nbackup
gfix_path=/usr/bin/gfix
gpre_path=/usr/bin/gpre

Then I run :

cd fbtest2.0.3
qmtest run -C context.txt functional

It produced the results file:

$ ls -lh results.qmr
-rw-r--r-- 1 odonohue odonohue 165K 2008-12-13 12:03 results.qmr

I was hoping for a basic report and tried most of the options for:

$qmtest report -f results.qmr

but it just kept replying with :
usage: qmtest report [ OPTIONS ] [ result [-e expected] ]+
and although -e is optional, I wasnt sure where the was.

So I did the gui thing.

$qmtest gui

And fired up the browser. I then chose File/Load Results, selected the
results.qmr file, and that seemed to work.

navagating to the first failue:
functional.arno.derived_tables.derived_tables_06

The difference is:

Actual result:
Statement failed, SQLCODE = -104
Dynamic SQL Error
-SQL error code = -104
-Token unknown - line 5, column 2
-=

Expected result:
Statement failed, SQLCODE = -206
Dynamic SQL Error
-SQL error code = -206
-Column unknown
-T10.ID
-At line 5, column 53

>
> The report command is not so important. The run command should produce
> the results.qmr file that you can rename (to have platform, fb arch. a
> run number, for example wcs1.qmr fro Windows Classic run 1) and send to
> me for further processing.
>

What further processing do you do?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-12T03:51:44Z

Mark O'Donohue napsal(a):
>
> Then you get to "Configuration" :
>
> It lists a group of key value pairs. They look nice, but what does
> one do with them? They really look like they want to go in a
> config file or be environment variables. There is a
> /home/fbtest/QMtest/configuration file but that is full of XML so
> I dont think they below there - or do they?

You need to create a text file with these variables with values valid
for your system. Then you will specify this file when running qmtest
using the -C option.

> The final step is to run qmtest, and list the cmd options.
>
> Does someone mind filling me in on what to do, in terms of completing
> the above howto example. I assume it then goes something like:
>
> $cd /home/fbtests
> $qmtest ls
> $qmtest run
>
> $qmtest report

The report command is not so important. The run command should produce
the results.qmr file that you can rename (to have platform, fb arch. a
run number, for example wcs1.qmr fro Windows Classic run 1) and send to
me for further processing.

If you want to look at results, I would advise to use the web gui
(qmtest qui command).

> And I guess it would be handy to run a subset of tests or an
> invidiual test, presumaby that is by:
>
> $qmtest ls functional.arno
> $qmtest run functional.arno

Yes.

best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Attempting to run qmtests

2008-12-11T22:25:46Z

Hi

It has been a while since I last ran qmtest for firebird, so I was
following the instructions at:

http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?op=devel&sub=qa&id=qmtest_howto

All is dandy,

$python qadbm.py
> repository /home/fbqa
> platform Windows
> target 1.5.2
> create /home/fbtests
> copy /home/fbtests
> exit

Then you get to "Configuration" :

It lists a group of key value pairs. They look nice, but what does
one do with them? They really look like they want to go in a
config file or be environment variables. There is a
/home/fbtest/QMtest/configuration file but that is full of XML so
I dont think they below there - or do they?

The final step is to run qmtest, and list the cmd options.

Does someone mind filling me in on what to do, in terms of completing
the above howto example. I assume it then goes something like:

$cd /home/fbtests
$qmtest ls
$qmtest run

$qmtest report

And I guess it would be handy to run a subset of tests or an
invidiual test, presumaby that is by:

$qmtest ls functional.arno
$qmtest run functional.arno

But at the moment I am stuck on configuration :-).

Cheers - Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: [Firebird-docs] Exampes database for firebird - Firebird SQL by examples

2008-09-30T06:40:52Z

Björn Reimer [08-09-30 15.23] :
> The current employee.fdb is not up to date at all. So I'd set up an
> own examples DB which is not perfect at all but may be a first step.
>
> So I'd like to ask if the topic "examples database" is part of the doc
> subproject or if it does not fit in here.
>
> Opinions? Are there any more supporters for these two projects?
>
good news
Last year this idea come but nobody started the work
Yes we need a new example database that can be used for both documentation and Q/A

so please, yes start, and we'll see after if some other pieces have to be added.

--
Philippe Makowski
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Tel +33 (0) 561058813

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Testing 1 2 3

2008-08-15T10:00:34Z

Just checking...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Tests for FK

2008-07-10T10:08:20Z

Hello,
>
> I'm posting this message instead of Vyacheslav. His original message was
> banned by SPAM-bot of sourceforge :) (What he must do in this case?)
>
sorry I don't know, I don't manage the list

>> Roman Simakov [08-07-01 11.23] :
>>
> Done. But I think in this case we will have a set of separate test cases
> for 2.x
> engine and we can't see full image about FK functionality.
Why are you telling that ?
I don't understand
tests are cumulative, so test tagged for 2.1 apply to 2.1 and 2.5

> And what about full test suite for reference integrity in firebird? This
> features are not checked full in QM test now.
why not
> I think we can develop tests for full checking this features. But this
> problem is very important and I think it would be very good to discuss
> all possible test cases. Can anybody help as with it? May be use SQL
> standard to gather test cases? Are there other ideas?
SQL standard are a good starting point yes

It lead to another idea that was on air, to have a new example database that could be use
for doc and for tests
Maybe we could start by this

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Tests for FK

2008-07-07T05:10:25Z

Hello, Philippe!

Many thanks for your comments about this tests.

I'm posting this message instead of Vyacheslav. His original message was
banned by SPAM-bot of sourceforge :) (What he must do in this case?)

> Roman Simakov [08-07-01 11.23] :
>
>> > I can send you them before commit but I think it's not critical if
>> you > review them after commit.
>>
> I see that they are committed, nice
>
> Just two point :
>
> can you use :
> #Create second connection - update detail table
> con_detail = kdb.connect(
> dsn=dsn.encode(),
> user=user_name.encode(),
> password=user_password.encode()
> )
>
> instead of :
> #Create second connection - update detail table
> con_detail = kdb.connect(
> dsn=dsn,
> user='SYSDBA',
> password='masterkey'
> )
>
>

Done.

> And seems that a lot of tests are ok for target before 2.5
> so can you change target for all tests that are also ok for 2.x ?
>

Done. But I think in this case we will have a set of separate test cases
for 2.x
engine and we can't see full image about FK functionality.
And what about full test suite for reference integrity in firebird? This
features are not checked full in QM test now.
I think we can develop tests for full checking this features. But this
problem is very important and I think it would be very good to discuss
all possible test cases. Can anybody help as with it? May be use SQL
standard to gather test cases? Are there other ideas?

> Thanks
> -- Philippe Makowski

Regards
Vyacheslav Ozherelyev
Red Soft Corporation

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Tests for FK

2008-07-03T02:36:14Z

Roman Simakov [08-07-01 11.23] :
> I can send you them before commit but I think it's not critical if you
> review them after commit.
I see that they are committed, nice

Just two point :

can you use :
#Create second connection - update detail table
con_detail = kdb.connect(
dsn=dsn.encode(),
user=user_name.encode(),
password=user_password.encode()
)

instead of :
#Create second connection - update detail table
con_detail = kdb.connect(
dsn=dsn,
user='SYSDBA',
password='masterkey'
)

And seems that a lot of tests are ok for target before 2.5
so can you change target for all tests that are also ok for 2.x ?

Thanks
--
Philippe Makowski
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Tel +33 (0) 561058813

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Tests for FK

2008-07-01T02:23:37Z

Hi,

We developed a few QM tests for FK testing. They include test cases when
master record is active and detail records reference to it. Yesterday,
2008-06-30, we committed the patch improving this handling and fixing
the error discussed 2008-04-12 in firebird-devel by report Sean Leyne.
We tested them on new Firebird HEAD. Test cases are a new directory in
functional.qms and not changed other tests. Only new files.
We think these tests will be useful and we'd like to commit them into QA
repository. I could commit them using my developer account.
I can send you them before commit but I think it's not critical if you
review them after commit.

Any opinions?

Best Regards,
Roman Simakov

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Should All QMTests Pass?

2008-05-02T05:17:36Z

Greg Kay [08-04-29 09.06] :

> Hi,
>
> We've just installed QMTest running against Firebird 2.1 Classic on
> linux but out of 551 tests, 22 have errors and 24 fail.
>
> We installed
>
> python-2.5.2.msi
> pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe
> kinterbasdb-3.2.win32-FB-1.0-py2.5.exe
> qmtest-2.4.win32.exe
>
>

hum
you ran test from Windows platform against a Linux Firebird ?

Our Qmtests are made to be run on the same box that Firebird is installed

> Also, is the difference between "ERROR" and "FAIL" that "ERROR" is some
> unexpected exception in the test?
yes

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Should All QMTests Pass?

2008-04-29T00:06:05Z

Hi,

We've just installed QMTest running against Firebird 2.1 Classic on
linux but out of 551 tests, 22 have errors and 24 fail.

We installed

python-2.5.2.msi
pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe
kinterbasdb-3.2.win32-FB-1.0-py2.5.exe
qmtest-2.4.win32.exe

Also, is the difference between "ERROR" and "FAIL" that "ERROR" is some
unexpected exception in the test?

Thanks.

Greg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Should All QM Tests Pass?

2008-04-28T23:58:40Z

Hi,

We've just installed QMTest running against Firebird 2.1 Classic on
linux but out of 551 tests, 22 have errors and 24 fail. Should they all
pass?

We installed:

python-2.5.2.msi
pywin32-210.win32-py2.5.exe
kinterbasdb-3.2.win32-FB-1.0-py2.5.exe
qmtest-2.4.win32.exe

Also, is the difference between "ERROR" and "FAIL" that "ERROR" is an
unexpected exception in the test?

Thanks.

Greg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Test will not connect to database (rather long)

2008-04-17T08:30:31Z

Jeff Jones - SHERIFFX [08-04-17 17.11] :
> Can you give me an example of how to use the -ch switch? I cannot find
> any documentation on it.
>
isql 127.0.0.1:/Volumes/tempo/firebird_db/rdisk2s3 -ch ISO8859_1 -user SYSDBA -password
masterkey
Database: 127.0.0.1:/Volumes/tempo/firebird_db/rdisk2s3, User: SYSDBA
SQL> set;
Print statistics: OFF
Echo commands: OFF
List format: OFF
Row Count: OFF
Autocommit DDL: ON
Access Plan: OFF
Access Plan only: OFF
Display BLOB type: 1
Set names: ISO8859_1
Column headings: ON
Terminator: ;
Time: OFF
Warnings: ON
Bail on error: OFF

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Test will not connect to database (rather long)

2008-04-17T08:11:47Z

Can you give me an example of how to use the -ch switch? I cannot find
any documentation on it.

Thanks!

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-test-bounces@...
[mailto:firebird-test-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Pavel
Cisar
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 07:40 AM
To: firebird-test@...
Subject: Re: [Firebird-test] Test will not connect to database (rather
long)

Jeff Jones - SHERIFFX napsal(a):
> I cannot find any documentation of how to use the -ch parameter in a
> CONNECT statement. I have found where you use a SET statement before
> the CONNECT statement to set the character set, and that seems to work
> fine. I have been unable to see how fbqa.py handles the connection.

The -ch option is cmdline switch equivalent to SET NAMES command used in
isql console before CONNECT/CREATE DATABASE statement. When you pass the
database name (and user name and password) as command line parameters to
isql, you need to use -ch when you need specific character set for
connection, as using SET NAMES is already too late. fbqa.py passes these
parameters as cmd switches because initialization scripts and actual
tests scripts feeded to isql stdin can't contain CONNECT/CREATE DATABASE
commands (for many reasons, for example they don't know the real paths),
hence it uses the -ch option.

best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/j
avaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Test will not connect to database (rather long)

2008-04-17T07:39:52Z

Jeff Jones - SHERIFFX napsal(a):
> I cannot find any documentation of how to use the -ch parameter in a
> CONNECT statement. I have found where you use a SET statement before
> the CONNECT statement to set the character set, and that seems to work
> fine. I have been unable to see how fbqa.py handles the connection.

The -ch option is cmdline switch equivalent to SET NAMES command used in
isql console before CONNECT/CREATE DATABASE statement. When you pass the
database name (and user name and password) as command line parameters to
isql, you need to use -ch when you need specific character set for
connection, as using SET NAMES is already too late. fbqa.py passes these
parameters as cmd switches because initialization scripts and actual
tests scripts feeded to isql stdin can't contain CONNECT/CREATE DATABASE
commands (for many reasons, for example they don't know the real paths),
hence it uses the -ch option.

best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

Re: Test will not connect to database (rather long)

2008-04-17T07:23:17Z

I cannot find any documentation of how to use the -ch parameter in a
CONNECT statement. I have found where you use a SET statement before
the CONNECT statement to set the character set, and that seems to work
fine. I have been unable to see how fbqa.py handles the connection.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-test-bounces@...
[mailto:firebird-test-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Pavel
Cisar
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:44 AM
To: firebird-test@...
Subject: Re: [Firebird-test] Test will not connect to database (rather
long)

Jeff Jones - SHERIFFX napsal(a):
>
> When I commented out the "-ch" parameter in the second call, my test
> worked. I don't quite understand why, but I am not going to question
it
> just yet.
>
> Can you tell my why this would work?

Interesting. There is no reason why -ch option (which is character set
specification to be used for connection) should make any trouble. Could
you try to run isql from system shell with the same parameters that
qmtest passes to it when it's run from it?

best regards
Pavel Cisar
IBPhoenix

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/j
avaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Firebird-test mailing list
Firebird-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-test