fun with sphinx

View: New views
11 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

fun with sphinx

by Justin Deoliveira-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi folks,

So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(

Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well: The
ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying it
manually into a code block.

I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing I
have found is the "literalinclude" directive:

http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude

Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the source
part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky and
external links are painful.

So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard it
would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some success. I
created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which basically looks
like this:

.. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
    :module: main
    :package: org.geoserver.catalog

And the result looks like the following:

http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation

And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:

.. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
    :module: main
    :package: org.geoserver.catalog
    :lines: 15-18

Leads to:

http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation

Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
sort of custom extension? Useful at all?

It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise none
the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of sphinx.

-Justin

--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Andrea Aime-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:

> Hi folks,
>
> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>
> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well: The
> ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying it
> manually into a code block.
>
> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing I
> have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>
> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude
>
> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the source
> part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky and
> external links are painful.
>
> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard it
> would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some success. I
> created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which basically looks
> like this:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>
> And the result looks like the following:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>     :lines: 15-18
>
> Leads to:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?

Well, first off, kudos to your python-fu :)

It seems to be useful all right.

You cited before that literalinclude requires
the file to be on the local file system so is this building
the file lookup (../../../src/main/src/main/java/... eek) in
a much more manageable manner?

To be extra sure: it does not require one to be online to build
the docs right? (e.g., it does not access svn via http and the like,
right?).

> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise none
> the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of sphinx.

The question that remains is, how is this extension integrating with
our docs? Is it a file that's sitting along with the docs and just gets
picked up during the build, or does it need to be installed in some
special location?

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Gabriel Roldan :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

That looks really great, congrats. It is indeed a long awaited feature
wrt docs.

It would be _perfect_ imho, if instead of having to reference code
snipets through line numbers it could be done through some sort of
tagging (so the file can evolve without breaking the docs). But I've no
idea whether that's possible or how :(


excellent work


Gabriel

Justin Deoliveira wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>
> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well: The
> ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying it
> manually into a code block.
>
> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing I
> have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>
> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude
>
> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the source
> part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky and
> external links are painful.
>
> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard it
> would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some success. I
> created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which basically looks
> like this:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>
> And the result looks like the following:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>     :lines: 15-18
>
> Leads to:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?
>
> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise none
> the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of sphinx.
>
> -Justin
>


--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Mike Pumphrey-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Does this mean that everyone who wants to build the GeoServer docs have to also check out the full GeoServer source code as well?

Thanks,
Mike Pumphrey
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org


Justin Deoliveira wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>
> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well: The
> ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying it
> manually into a code block.
>
> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing I
> have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>
> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude
>
> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the source
> part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky and
> external links are painful.
>
> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard it
> would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some success. I
> created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which basically looks
> like this:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>
> And the result looks like the following:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>
> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>     :module: main
>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>     :lines: 15-18
>
> Leads to:
>
> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>
> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?
>
> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise none
> the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of sphinx.
>
> -Justin
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Justin Deoliveira-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Andrea Aime wrote:

> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
>> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
>> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>>
>> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
>> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well:
>> The ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying
>> it manually into a code block.
>>
>> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
>> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing
>> I have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>>
>> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude 
>>
>>
>> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
>> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the
>> source part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky
>> and external links are painful.
>>
>> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard
>> it would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some
>> success. I created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which
>> basically looks like this:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>
>> And the result looks like the following:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>     :lines: 15-18
>>
>> Leads to:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
>> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?
>
> Well, first off, kudos to your python-fu :)
>
> It seems to be useful all right.
>
> You cited before that literalinclude requires
> the file to be on the local file system so is this building
> the file lookup (../../../src/main/src/main/java/... eek) in
> a much more manageable manner?
Actually it is pulling the file in over the web from the svn repo. It
works by setting a default baseurl in the conf.py file, which looks like:

gsinclude_baseurl = "http://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/trunk"

And the gsinclude directive uses that + all the info such as class name,
package name and module to locate the file. And then pulls it in via
http. If it can't find the file or is offline it simply issues a warning
and continues on, and the code block is empty.

We could change this so that is builds up the path into the source tree.
The downside of which would be that you could not build the docs
separately from the sources, the upside would be it would work offline..

>
> To be extra sure: it does not require one to be online to build
> the docs right? (e.g., it does not access svn via http and the like,
> right?).
>
>> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
>> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise
>> none the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of
>> sphinx.
>
> The question that remains is, how is this extension integrating with
> our docs? Is it a file that's sitting along with the docs and just gets
> picked up during the build, or does it need to be installed in some
> special location?
No additional installation required. I created a "sphinxext" directory
which sits parallel do the "developer","user", and "docguide"
directories. For each conf.py you need to point it at the extension
directory, and enable the specific extension. So once someone who
develops the extension commits it and updates any conf.py files, those
updating won't have to do anything to enable it.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>


--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Justin Deoliveira-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Gabriel Roldan wrote:
> That looks really great, congrats. It is indeed a long awaited feature
> wrt docs.
>
> It would be _perfect_ imho, if instead of having to reference code
> snipets through line numbers it could be done through some sort of
> tagging (so the file can evolve without breaking the docs). But I've no
> idea whether that's possible or how :(
Agreed, and this is possible if the target language is python... but
unfortunately not java :(

>
>
> excellent work
>
>
> Gabriel
>
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
>> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
>> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>>
>> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
>> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well:
>> The ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying
>> it manually into a code block.
>>
>> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
>> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing
>> I have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>>
>> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude 
>>
>>
>> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
>> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the
>> source part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky
>> and external links are painful.
>>
>> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard
>> it would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some
>> success. I created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which
>> basically looks like this:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>
>> And the result looks like the following:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>     :lines: 15-18
>>
>> Leads to:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
>> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?
>>
>> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
>> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise
>> none the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of
>> sphinx.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>
>


--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Justin Deoliveira-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Nope, it references the sources online directly from the svn repo. So
you need to be online or else you will get an empty code block.

Mike Pumphrey wrote:

> Does this mean that everyone who wants to build the GeoServer docs have
> to also check out the full GeoServer source code as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Pumphrey
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>
>
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> So I spent some time writing developer docs for trunk today, and wrote
>> up developer notes about the web ui with a short tutorial. I would
>> provide the link but docs.geoserver.org seems to be down :(
>>
>> Regardless, in doing so I found my self wanting a feature again with
>> sphinx that was a feature I always wanted out of confluence as well:
>> The ability to reference code directly out of svn instead of copying
>> it manually into a code block.
>>
>> I have looked for the ability to do this in sphinx, and it seems this
>> sort of feature is only supported with python. Boo. The closest thing
>> I have found is the "literalinclude" directive:
>>
>> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/code.html?highlight=literalinclude#dir-literalinclude 
>>
>>
>> Which is almost exactly what I want, however it requires files to be
>> local. It might work mucking with file paths referencing into the
>> source part of the tree via an external link... but that seemed hacky
>> and external links are painful.
>>
>> So I decided to look into the sphinx extension system to see how hard
>> it would be to write a plugin that did this. And I met with some
>> success. I created an custom directive called "gsinclude" which
>> basically looks like this:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>
>> And the result looks like the following:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs723/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> And it works with all the line filtering goodness as well:
>>
>> .. gsinclude:: CatalogInfo
>>     :module: main
>>     :package: org.geoserver.catalog
>>     :lines: 15-18
>>
>> Leads to:
>>
>> http://skitch.com/jdeolive/bs727/skunkworks-v1.0-documentation
>>
>> Fun stuff. What I am wondering is what other people think about this
>> sort of custom extension? Useful at all?
>>
>> It is also very possible that the sphinx gurus out there have a better
>> way to solve this, so I am all ears if they do. But a good exercise
>> none the less to become familiar with some the internal workings of
>> sphinx.
>>
>> -Justin
>>


--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Andrea Aime-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Nope, it references the sources online directly from the svn repo. So
> you need to be online or else you will get an empty code block.

Given the choice, and from the perspective of someone that has
a slow ping line (160ms to ping the svn repo), I'd very much prefer
it to hit the local checkout as opposed to a network connection.

To give you an example:


time curl
https://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/trunk/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/data/CatalogReader.java 
 > /dev/null
   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time
  Current
                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left
  Speed
100  5818  100  5818    0     0   6623      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
36136

real 0m0.885s
user 0m0.020s
sys 0m0.004s

So I would basically a bit less than an extra second in the build per
snippet included in the docs. If the docs start making heavy use
of it we may add up to a few extra minutes of build time (every time
the build is done).

I don't know how typical this is, but persuaded it's common enough
for people in southern Europe, and may be worse in other countries.
Also, this keeps on downloading small amounts at each build, which
is not so good in countries where you pay per MB downloaded (and not
so good either if you're paying per hour since you can't build
without being online).

Finally, we're talking about the developer guide here, not the user one,
so it does not seem so odd to require a full checkout of GeoServer
with sources included.

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Justin Deoliveira-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Andrea Aime wrote:

> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> Nope, it references the sources online directly from the svn repo. So
>> you need to be online or else you will get an empty code block.
>
> Given the choice, and from the perspective of someone that has
> a slow ping line (160ms to ping the svn repo), I'd very much prefer
> it to hit the local checkout as opposed to a network connection.
>
> To give you an example:
>
>
> time curl
> https://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/trunk/src/main/src/main/java/org/geoserver/data/CatalogReader.java 
>  > /dev/null
>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time
>  Current
>                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left
>  Speed
> 100  5818  100  5818    0     0   6623      0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
> 36136
>
> real    0m0.885s
> user    0m0.020s
> sys    0m0.004s
>
> So I would basically a bit less than an extra second in the build per
> snippet included in the docs. If the docs start making heavy use
> of it we may add up to a few extra minutes of build time (every time
> the build is done).
>
You would only pay the full cost if you do a clean build, which from my
experiences is not very often. The downloaded files are stored locally
and not redownloaded over and over again.

That said it should be easy enough to do the check for the local
sources, and use them if they are available. Should provide the best of
both worlds.

> I don't know how typical this is, but persuaded it's common enough
> for people in southern Europe, and may be worse in other countries.
> Also, this keeps on downloading small amounts at each build, which
> is not so good in countries where you pay per MB downloaded (and not
> so good either if you're paying per hour since you can't build
> without being online).
>
> Finally, we're talking about the developer guide here, not the user one,
> so it does not seem so odd to require a full checkout of GeoServer
> with sources included.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>


--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Andrea Aime-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:

>> So I would basically a bit less than an extra second in the build per
>> snippet included in the docs. If the docs start making heavy use
>> of it we may add up to a few extra minutes of build time (every time
>> the build is done).
>>
> You would only pay the full cost if you do a clean build, which from my
> experiences is not very often. The downloaded files are stored locally
> and not redownloaded over and over again.
>
> That said it should be easy enough to do the check for the local
> sources, and use them if they are available. Should provide the best of
> both worlds.

Yup, sounds like a winner.

Cheers
Andrea

--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Re: fun with sphinx

by Mike Pumphrey-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Great.  Can you add this handy new method to the docguide?  Do you want me to assign a JIRA to you to do that?

Thanks,
Mike Pumphrey
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org


Andrea Aime wrote:

> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>>> So I would basically a bit less than an extra second in the build per
>>> snippet included in the docs. If the docs start making heavy use
>>> of it we may add up to a few extra minutes of build time (every time
>>> the build is done).
>>>
>> You would only pay the full cost if you do a clean build, which from my
>> experiences is not very often. The downloaded files are stored locally
>> and not redownloaded over and over again.
>>
>> That said it should be easy enough to do the check for the local
>> sources, and use them if they are available. Should provide the best of
>> both worlds.
>
> Yup, sounds like a winner.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel