|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
gummibaerchen status?Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU?
I read he is flagged as active but: - he have not an account on dev platform - last package sent on 05th April '09 - last closed bug on 22th April '09 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@...> wrote:
> Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU? > I read he is flagged as active but: > - he have not an account on dev platform > - last package sent on 05th April '09 > - last closed bug on 22th April '09 > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > Last post on BBS: 2009-10-11 14:13:37 But it's not the last TU activity that you mentioned but, but the forum. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@...> wrote:
> Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU? > I read he is flagged as active but: > - he have not an account on dev platform > - last package sent on 05th April '09 > - last closed bug on 22th April '09 > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > he opened a feature request for empathy and assigned it to me last week. -- Ionut |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?Should we proceed with removal?
-- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@...> wrote:
> Should we proceed with removal? > > -- > Andrea `bash` Scarpino > Arch Linux Developer > yes, he's been inactive for far too long without any notice. According to the bylaws, the standard voting procedure for undeclared inactivity is: SVP( inactivity_removal_of_TU, 3, 0.66, 5 ); Problems with starting the 3-day discussion period now? Ronald |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?Daenyth Blank schrieb:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 17:48, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@...> wrote: >> Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU? >> I read he is flagged as active but: >> - he have not an account on dev platform > This should be fixed > >> - last package sent on 05th April '09 >> - last closed bug on 22th April '09 > Does he have any out of date packages or outstanding bugs? Perhaps he > just has not had anything to work on.. > Hello, I think, this questions should be answered by Tim himself. If you have no account on dev.archlinux.org, you have no packages there, so you won't have bugs. :) Regards Stefan |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 17:48, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@...> wrote:
> Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU? > I read he is flagged as active but: > - he have not an account on dev platform This should be fixed > - last package sent on 05th April '09 > - last closed bug on 22th April '09 Does he have any out of date packages or outstanding bugs? Perhaps he just has not had anything to work on.. |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On 17/11/2009, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@...> wrote:
> This should be fixed This is not. And he didn't send any mails to DEVs to setup one account. No package. No bugs. No project. Is this the cause we are here? We have ~2000 orphans packages, ~500 bugs, ours projects needs some patches. And you tell me "he have nothing to do"? I already told in past, no problem if you are busy or life is hard. But if you are active, be active. Just my point. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 23:48 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Is Timm Preetz aka gummimbaerchen still a TU? > I read he is flagged as active but: > - he have not an account on dev platform > - last package sent on 05th April '09 > - last closed bug on 22th April '09 > Hi guys, you're right, I have not yet made a transition to the new system. So, I have been inactive since the switch. Since my last update screwed pacman itself, I had to get a working system quickly, and now I'm on Ubuntu... So, I don't think I will be back on Arch for at least another few month, not sure when or if I can start contributing again. I really like the time with Arch, but having started university and moving, I have less time to package stuff and get it working ;) Nevertheless, I hope to be able to contribute to the Linux eco-system again in the future. Best regards, Timm |
|
|
Re: gummibaerchen status?On 17/11/2009, Timm Preetz <timm@...> wrote:
> Hi guys, > > you're right, I have not yet made a transition to the new system. > > So, I have been inactive since the switch. > > Since my last update screwed pacman itself, I had to get a working > system quickly, and now I'm on Ubuntu... > > So, I don't think I will be back on Arch for at least another few month, > not sure when or if I can start contributing again. > > I really like the time with Arch, but having started university and > moving, I have less time to package stuff and get it working ;) > > Nevertheless, I hope to be able to contribute to the Linux eco-system > again in the future. resignation message? If so please start a new thread on aur-general. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |