|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
has_many :through habtmHere is my setup: class Product < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :catalog has_and_belongs_to_many :product_groups end class ProductGroup < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :catalog has_and_belongs_to_many :products end class Catalog < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :product_groups has_many :products, :through => :product_groups end I get: Invalid source reflection macro :has_and_belongs_to_many for has_many :products, :through => :product_groups. Use :source to specify the source reflection. ---------- I have seen a few threads with posts asking this question, but found no suitable solution or workaround.. any ideas please. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: has_many :through habtmAs written, there's no direct way to do this association in Rails. But wouldn't it be sufficient to use a plain has_many :products in Catalog? You've got a corresponding belongs_to in Product... --Matt Jones On Jul 9, 6:42 pm, slava <mikerin.sl...@...> wrote: > Here is my setup: > > class Product < ActiveRecord::Base > belongs_to :catalog > has_and_belongs_to_many :product_groups > end > > class ProductGroup < ActiveRecord::Base > belongs_to :catalog > has_and_belongs_to_many :products > end > > class Catalog < ActiveRecord::Base > has_many :product_groups > has_many :products, :through => :product_groups > end > > I get: > Invalid source reflection macro :has_and_belongs_to_many for > has_many :products, :through => :product_groups. Use :source to > specify the source reflection. > > ---------- > I have seen a few threads with posts asking this question, but found > no suitable solution or workaround.. > any ideas please. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: has_many :through habtmyeah, I think it is sufficient. thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |