|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
head element in site.xml?Hi,
I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) site contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript snippet in all created site pages. I was not aware that this was possible, it's not mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't help me either. Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated pages invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that it's illegal [also 1]. So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever knows more, please document! :) -Lukas [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230 |
|
|
Re: head element in site.xml?Yes :)
Though it's probably a bit dodgy as is. It really is XHTML specific - you probably want some more general way to include in there. The JavaScript is for Google Analytics (which btw, seems to have broken with a recent site deploy... traffic halved suddenly 2 weeks ago) - Brett On 07/09/2007, at 5:25 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) > site contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript > snippet in all created site pages. I was not aware that this was > possible, it's not mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't > help me either. > > Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated > pages invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that > it's illegal [also 1]. > > So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever > knows more, please document! :) > > -Lukas > > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230 -- Brett Porter - brett@... Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ |
|
|
Re: head element in site.xml?Hi,
2007/9/7, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl@...>: > Hi, > > I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) site > contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript snippet in > all created site pages. I was not aware that this was possible, it's not > mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't help me either. Exactly. A small doc is in the description of the head field in decoration.mdo (doxia-decoration-model). > Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated pages > invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that it's illegal > [also 1]. > > So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever knows > more, please document! :) We need it, as brett said. For your first point, it due to a non-desired behaviour in p-u. Have a glance to the comment in org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.Xpp3Dom#toString() I will fix the default-site.vm with a small workaround. Cheers, Vincent > > -Lukas > > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230 > |
|
|
Re: head element in site.xml?is there any othwer way to put site.xml other thn putting it inside src/site folder
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |