incompatible Shale distributions

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

incompatible Shale distributions

by kolaloka :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi All,
I've downloaded two Shale "distributions". One from Javaworld JSF Shale Seam,
other Apache Shale mirror,
here shale-usecases-current.zip

I want to integrate the two so my application would contain operational features from Shale usecases and user-interface elements from the first example (later even more). However, the shale-*jar files doesn't match  in number and in contents, many important classes missing from both and I can't find a way to integate them.
I can't put both shale-core.jar and shale-core-1.0.4.jar in my application. The application is EJB3 with stateless session beans under JBoss 4.2.1 which part is already clear (I already removed JSF from it).

Why are these jars so different? How could I make them cooperate?

Thank you in advance: Balázs Bámer

Re: incompatible Shale distributions

by kolaloka :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Sorry, second link is
Apache Shale mirror

Re: incompatible Shale distributions

by kolaloka :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Once more:
http://apache.mirrors.crysys.hit.bme.hu/dist/shale/
here  shale-usecases-current.zip

Re: incompatible Shale distributions

by Rahul Akolkar :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 10/31/07, kolaloka <kolaloka@...> wrote:

>
> Hi All,
> I've downloaded two Shale "distributions". One from
> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-05-2006/jw-0515-jsf.html Javaworld JSF
> Shale Seam ,
> other  "from http://apache.mirrors.crysys.hit.bme.hu/dist/shale Apache Shale
> mirror ,
> here shale-usecases-current.zip
>
> I want to integrate the two so my application would contain operational
> features from Shale usecases and user-interface elements from the first
> example (later even more). However, the shale-*jar files doesn't match  in
> number and in contents, many important classes missing from both and I can't
> find a way to integate them.
> I can't put both shale-core.jar and shale-core-1.0.4.jar in my application.
> The application is EJB3 with stateless session beans under JBoss 4.2.1 which
> part is already clear (I already removed JSF from it).
>
> Why are these jars so different? How could I make them cooperate?
>
<snip/>

As you've noticed, there was some refactoring of the core (and other)
modules/jars in release v1.0.4. I haven't looked at the article link
you provided, but to figure out what changed, please take a closer
look at the release notes.

Compare v1.0.3:

  http://shale.apache.org/docs/release-notes-1.0.3.html

with v1.0.4:

  http://shale.apache.org/docs/release-notes-1.0.4.html

Section 2.1, in both, talks about the various jars in the distro (you
may need more than shale-core). Section 5.0 in v1.0.4 notes talks
about the detailed changes, and you might want to browse through that
as well.

-Rahul



> Thank you in advance: Balázs Bámer
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/incompatible-Shale-distributions-tf4727761.html#a13518288
> Sent from the Shale - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Re: incompatible Shale distributions

by kolaloka :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Rahul,

>As you've noticed, there was some refactoring of the core (and other)
>modules/jars in release v1.0.4. I haven't looked at the article link
>you provided, but to figure out what changed, please take a closer
>look at the release notes.

This can be the reason, thank you! Can the shale-core.jar and others in the Javaworld example be
an other compilation or branch than any previous version in the "official" Shale series? I mean do you know anyone making custom jars? My problem is both jar collections have some functionality I could not find in the other. I will have a look at the release notes, perhaps they describe why and where these are gone.

Thank you again: Balázs Bámer