issue 289 considerations

[Jacek Kopecky]

Hi all,
we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about
providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts
from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until
after PR, I expect.

The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2].
The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf
We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too:

MessageExchangePatterns and their labels:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only

SafeInteraction class:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions

OperationStyles:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc

Signature extension:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc

The bindings:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap

Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces?

Best regards,
Jacek

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x289
[2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#uri-summary