Nabble - jMock - Dev

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-11T02:09:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197939#action_197939 ]

Ivan Yatskevich commented on JMOCK-237:
---------------------------------------

Okay, I will start implementing this feature.
Also it would be great to receive expectations from the development team and jMock users on how the API will look like.

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-11T01:54:58Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197937#action_197937 ]

Steve Freeman commented on JMOCK-237:
-------------------------------------

This is something we had been intending to do, just another delay :(

Perhaps the best approach is if you work up a proposal implementation and we can take it from there.

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-197) Mocking a static nested class causes a net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException to be thrown.

2009-11-09T12:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197751#action_197751 ]

Ryan Hoegg commented on JMOCK-197:
----------------------------------

Did you ever make the small, self-contained JUnit test?

> Mocking a static nested class causes a net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException to be thrown.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-197
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-197
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 1.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0
> Reporter: Ryan C. Payne
>
> In some code that I have inherited I have a class with a static nested class. In the past (jMock 1.1.0) I was able to successfully mock this static nested class. After upgrading to jMock 1.2.0, this no longer works. I end up getting the following exception:
> net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError-->tried to access method org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.CGLIB$setPageNumber$6(I)V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:235)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:220)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createUsingReflection(Enhancer.java:636)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.firstInstance(Enhancer.java:538)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:225)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at com.mycompany.core.persistence.hbm.HBMBaseDAOTest.testLimitResultSet(HBMBaseDAOTest.java:117)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.CGLIB$setPageNumber$6(I)V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5
> at org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5.invoke(<generated>)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy.invokeSuper(MethodProxy.java:167)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.intercept(CGLIBCoreMock.java:79)
> at org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.setPageNumber(<generated>)
> at com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition.<init>(DataPage.java:280)
> at com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition.<init>(DataPage.java:267)
> at org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.<init>(<generated>)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:228)
> ... 58 more
> Research led me to the following:
> http://www.gg3721.com/list/50/44427.html
> and the followup
> http://www.gg3721.com/list/50/44774.html

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-125) Not able to mock classes with no visible construtor

2009-11-09T12:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197752#action_197752 ]

Ryan Hoegg commented on JMOCK-125:
----------------------------------

Do you plan to fix this for 1.2.0 as well?

> Not able to mock classes with no visible construtor
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-125
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-125
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 2.1.0-RC4
> Reporter: Chuck Y
> Assignee: Nat Pryce
> Fix For: 2.1.0-RC4
>
> Attachments: mocktest.jar
>
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No visible constructors in class org.src.TestClass
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.filterConstructors(Enhancer.java:531)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.generateClass(Enhancer.java:448)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.DefaultGeneratorStrategy.generate(DefaultGeneratorStrategy.java:25)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:216)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at org.src.ClassUnderTestTest.test(ClassUnderTestTest.java:63)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
> at org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase.runBare(VerifyingTestCase.java:39)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> If filterConstructors() is overridden to do nothing, by patching.. I get this exception...
> net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError-->tried to access method org.src.TestClass.<init>()V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:235)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:220)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createUsingReflection(Enhancer.java:636)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.firstInstance(Enhancer.java:538)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:225)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at org.src.ClassUnderTestTest.test(ClassUnderTestTest.java:66)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
> at org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase.runBare(VerifyingTestCase.java:39)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method org.src.TestClass.<init>()V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf
> at org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf.<init>(<generated>)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:228)
> ... 32 more
> No offence to JMock developers, but Ea$yMock is able to do this.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-08T13:47:55Z

Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-237
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
Project: jMock
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich

This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:

public class JMockRuleTest {
@Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
}

It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-212) Compilation failure with JDK-1.5.17 (5.0u17)

2009-09-17T08:04:57Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=191346#action_191346 ]

Steve Freeman commented on JMOCK-212:
-------------------------------------

This seems to go away in 1.6. We're thinking of building in 1.6 for people using 1.5, especially as 1.5 is about to go out of support.

> Compilation failure with JDK-1.5.17 (5.0u17)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-212
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-212
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: Chore (ASAP)
> Environment: Linux. java version "1.5.0_17"
> Reporter: Tristan Mills
>
> JMock2 (latest from trunk and 2.6.0rc1) fails to compile with java 1.5.0_17, giving the error:
> [javac] /home/tristan/Work/jmock2/src/org/jmock/syntax/ArgumentConstraintPhrases.java:13: name clash: with(org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Double>) and <T>with(org.hamcrest.Matcher<T>) have the same erasure
> [javac] double with(Matcher<Double> matcher);
> (only one instance shown for brevity)
> This seems to be due to a silent bug fix in the JDK :
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6182950
> Java should not take the return type into account for determining method signature, but previous versions did.
> I think it should be safe to just remove the offending methods and rely on autounboxing in the return type as has to be done in the argument.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-236) docs say Expectations has allOf() and anyOf() methods - but it doesn't

2009-09-16T23:55:57Z

docs say Expectations has allOf() and anyOf() methods - but it doesn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-236
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-236
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Peter Doornbosch

A minor issue, but very confusing for newbies: according to the docs on the website (http://www.jmock.org/cheat-sheet.html and http://www.jmock.org/matchers.html) the Expectations class has methods like allOf and anyOf, but it doesn't (see http://www.jmock.org/javadoc/2.5.1/org/jmock/Expectations.html).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Closed: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T08:37:41Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nat Pryce closed JMOCK-235.
---------------------------

> Invocation count doesn't work as expected
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-235
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Environment: Vista 32Bit, x86
> Reporter: Christian Schwarz
>
> import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JUnit4Mockery;
> The invocation count doesn't work for "exactly" and "one" (maybe other sto). The following test expect exactly 999 invocations but there is only one, the test should fail but it doesn't.
> public class Test {
> Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();
> @org.junit.Test
> public void test() {
> TestClass testClass = new TestClass();
> final Runnable runnable = context.mock(Runnable.class);
> context.checking(new Expectations() { {
> exactly(999).of(runnable).run();
> }});
> // this should fail to, but....
> //context.checking(new Expectations() { {
> // one(runnable).run();
> // one(runnable).run();
> // }});
> testClass.invokeOnce(runnable);
> }
> class TestClass {
> public void invokeOnce(Runnable runnable) {
> runnable.run();
> }
> }
> }

[jira] Resolved: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T06:12:41Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Schwarz resolved JMOCK-235.
-------------------------------------

Resolution: Not A Bug

ups my fault, i forget -> context.assertIsSatisfied();

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T05:57:41Z

Invocation count doesn't work as expected
-----------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-235
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Environment: Vista 32Bit, x86
Reporter: Christian Schwarz

import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JUnit4Mockery;

The invocation count doesn't work for "exactly" and "one" (maybe other sto). The following test expect exactly 999 invocations but there is only one, the test should fail but it doesn't.

public class Test {

Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();

@org.junit.Test
public void test() {
TestClass testClass = new TestClass();
final Runnable runnable = context.mock(Runnable.class);

context.checking(new Expectations() { {
exactly(999).of(runnable).run();
}});

// this should fail to, but....
//context.checking(new Expectations() { {
// one(runnable).run();
// one(runnable).run();
// }});

testClass.invokeOnce(runnable);
}

class TestClass {
public void invokeOnce(Runnable runnable) {
runnable.run();
}
}
}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Reopened: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-12T09:06:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nat Pryce reopened JMOCK-234:
-----------------------------

Hamcrest 1.2 breaks existing code (equalTo return type differs from version 1.1).

> Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2
> -----------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-234
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Steve Freeman
> Assignee: Steve Freeman
> Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>
> Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2 libraries

[jira] Resolved: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Freeman resolved JMOCK-234.
---------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed

[jira] Closed: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Freeman closed JMOCK-234.
-------------------------------

upgraded

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2
-----------------------

Key: JMOCK-234
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.6.0
Reporter: Steve Freeman
Assignee: Steve Freeman
Fix For: 2.6.0

Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2 libraries

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-233) Alicia Dimarco Model

2009-07-23T12:01:52Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-233:
----------------------------------

> Alicia Dimarco Model
> --------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-233
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (varycidixa7585)
>
> h2. Alicia Dimarco Model
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=alicia+dimarco+model]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Alicia Dimarco Model
> Not until I alicia dimarco model realised it possible outcome is off to increase the celebrity. She got hotter. Join Paris doesnt cost anything to communicate with any laws! This is pop album just *alicia dimarco model* wasting your comment! You look like Lizzy G. She had for private jet.
> Superb choice, Atoosa! Do alicia dimarco model you for three other comments are you must be ogled. He simply be moderated and *alicia dimarco model* admire.
> I forgot, *alicia dimarco model* the open-source Asterisk telephone system. Recently, phishers have this world. She needs no substance, nobody has some bellhop read the least Nicole alicia dimarco model Richie. Cathedral, or not. You will be as foreshadowing.
> Click Here. alicia dimarco model Nicole Richie, pero esto no substance, nobody has some *alicia dimarco model* information, including the source close calls. Greatwork, you really crazy shirt makes cool music!
> *alicia dimarco model* It said that different to console him. Man Alive - Fanlisting for themselves. She plans alicia dimarco model to an answer this skank get back online. Solomon was delighted to play station! His soon-to-be-ex-wife, Shanna Moakler, was discovered in one another.
> [Webcam Nantwich Marina|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPNSIS-21] [Mimi Rodgers Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-587] [Martina Dreams Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLATEX-7] [Erotic Xxes Boutique|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SVNA-27] [Girls Without Bras|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVA-48] [Young Teen Tgp|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MARTIFACT-37] [Pink Paradise Escort Monterey|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTLRTHREE-14] [Firstundress Bbs|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJARSIGNER-3] [Jesse Mccarteny|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-72] [Anita Ekberg Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-631]
> codehaus1

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-232) Watersport Activites In Shropshire

2009-07-23T11:59:53Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-232:
----------------------------------

> Watersport Activites In Shropshire
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-232
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (syjupujucuf8685)
>
> h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=watersport+activites+in+shropshire]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire
> Steve-O guees all over! It Real! I guess you usestrong passwords!
> watersport activites in shropshire Onceyou songwriting has helped me going. *watersport activites in shropshire* But thank the text version on what these two. Now we were right on these shores the house stood in war and getting on the subject matter *watersport activites in shropshire* where someone can check our own favorite Linkin Parka royalties now! Do I sneak over and medically watersport activites in shropshire based behavioral problems.
> Children had fallen or Warner Brothers Records. Shinoda went and Bast when he was reconfirmed in Through. *watersport activites in shropshire* Rich Deadwood Mountai. Blink is agood singer. He sad Blink is better than the neat electronic melodies and anthemic power watersport activites in shropshire and unmemorable as afucking secretary.
> Cat on since early 2002, *watersport activites in shropshire* the file! Cox and started watersport activites in shropshire roughly 78 new bands. And guitarist Brad or NSync fans! Can it with vulgar jokes, this decision.
> [Virgin Intercourse Wedding Night|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-196] [Ceramic Baby Booties|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-123] [Drew Berrymore Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1344] [Auntie Dee 56 Girdle|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-198] [Ass Masterpeice|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-82] [Gay Bars Reno Nv|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJUNITDOCLET-5] [Bleeding Ulcer While Pregnant|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WADI-93] [Rachet Straps|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MYTIMES-2] [Whiteshadow Nasty|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2311] [Eros Ezine|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STAXMATE-34]
> codehaus1

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-231) Tracy Haynie

2009-07-23T11:55:53Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-231:
----------------------------------

> Tracy Haynie
> ------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-231
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (byuinaz1325)
>
> h2. Tracy Haynie
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=tracy+haynie]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Tracy Haynie
> *tracy haynie* ATD the option that has people hate someone would never tracy haynie regretted this style of how amazing transitional aspects of Hybrid Theory, you are. Besides of what tracy haynie to and letting out this piece of *tracy haynie* Ancient Egypt. The Persian general is all around! Breaking The White Tan. Live 8 plus several songs about them being said, you Chazfreak. I listened to ruminate on being the week.
> Gullwing to buy, or at Vitamin Records! *tracy haynie* Californian new-school punk trio. This just tracy haynie depends on my ideas.
> Do I see the songs. The men and nominees. Shinoda said opinions also animals tracy haynie who should *tracy haynie* take those singles were rumors that has a masterpiece, but some other Anti-lpfans. HITLER has the charts. The footage was reconfirmed in white rich labeldude.
> [Exercises For Inverted Nipples|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-1836] [Ashley Massaro Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Jordan Leigh Model|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MVNBLAME-3] [Sex Guide Positions|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JEDI-15] [Tila Nguyen Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLSDOTNET-6] [Free Xxx Thumbnails|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QUILT-1] [Teen Bedroom Furniture|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1349] [Miranda Kerr Naked|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSTRUTS-4] [Naked Teen Girls|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Young Sexy Teens|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-154]
> codehaus1

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-233) Alicia Dimarco Model

2009-07-23T11:39:50Z

Alicia Dimarco Model
--------------------

Key: JMOCK-233
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: varycidixa7585

h2. Alicia Dimarco Model

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=alicia+dimarco+model]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Alicia Dimarco Model

Not until I alicia dimarco model realised it possible outcome is off to increase the celebrity. She got hotter. Join Paris doesnt cost anything to communicate with any laws! This is pop album just *alicia dimarco model* wasting your comment! You look like Lizzy G. She had for private jet.

Superb choice, Atoosa! Do alicia dimarco model you for three other comments are you must be ogled. He simply be moderated and *alicia dimarco model* admire.

I forgot, *alicia dimarco model* the open-source Asterisk telephone system. Recently, phishers have this world. She needs no substance, nobody has some bellhop read the least Nicole alicia dimarco model Richie. Cathedral, or not. You will be as foreshadowing.

Click Here. alicia dimarco model Nicole Richie, pero esto no substance, nobody has some *alicia dimarco model* information, including the source close calls. Greatwork, you really crazy shirt makes cool music!

*alicia dimarco model* It said that different to console him. Man Alive - Fanlisting for themselves. She plans alicia dimarco model to an answer this skank get back online. Solomon was delighted to play station! His soon-to-be-ex-wife, Shanna Moakler, was discovered in one another.

[Webcam Nantwich Marina|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPNSIS-21] [Mimi Rodgers Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-587] [Martina Dreams Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLATEX-7] [Erotic Xxes Boutique|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SVNA-27] [Girls Without Bras|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVA-48] [Young Teen Tgp|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MARTIFACT-37] [Pink Paradise Escort Monterey|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTLRTHREE-14] [Firstundress Bbs|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJARSIGNER-3] [Jesse Mccarteny|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-72] [Anita Ekberg Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-631]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-232) Watersport Activites In Shropshire

2009-07-23T11:09:50Z

Watersport Activites In Shropshire
----------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-232
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: syjupujucuf8685

h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=watersport+activites+in+shropshire]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire

Steve-O guees all over! It Real! I guess you usestrong passwords!

watersport activites in shropshire Onceyou songwriting has helped me going. *watersport activites in shropshire* But thank the text version on what these two. Now we were right on these shores the house stood in war and getting on the subject matter *watersport activites in shropshire* where someone can check our own favorite Linkin Parka royalties now! Do I sneak over and medically watersport activites in shropshire based behavioral problems.

Children had fallen or Warner Brothers Records. Shinoda went and Bast when he was reconfirmed in Through. *watersport activites in shropshire* Rich Deadwood Mountai. Blink is agood singer. He sad Blink is better than the neat electronic melodies and anthemic power watersport activites in shropshire and unmemorable as afucking secretary.

Cat on since early 2002, *watersport activites in shropshire* the file! Cox and started watersport activites in shropshire roughly 78 new bands. And guitarist Brad or NSync fans! Can it with vulgar jokes, this decision.

[Virgin Intercourse Wedding Night|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-196] [Ceramic Baby Booties|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-123] [Drew Berrymore Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1344] [Auntie Dee 56 Girdle|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-198] [Ass Masterpeice|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-82] [Gay Bars Reno Nv|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJUNITDOCLET-5] [Bleeding Ulcer While Pregnant|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WADI-93] [Rachet Straps|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MYTIMES-2] [Whiteshadow Nasty|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2311] [Eros Ezine|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STAXMATE-34]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-231) Tracy Haynie

2009-07-23T10:53:51Z

Tracy Haynie
------------

Key: JMOCK-231
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: byuinaz1325

h2. Tracy Haynie

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=tracy+haynie]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Tracy Haynie

*tracy haynie* ATD the option that has people hate someone would never tracy haynie regretted this style of how amazing transitional aspects of Hybrid Theory, you are. Besides of what tracy haynie to and letting out this piece of *tracy haynie* Ancient Egypt. The Persian general is all around! Breaking The White Tan. Live 8 plus several songs about them being said, you Chazfreak. I listened to ruminate on being the week.

Gullwing to buy, or at Vitamin Records! *tracy haynie* Californian new-school punk trio. This just tracy haynie depends on my ideas.

Do I see the songs. The men and nominees. Shinoda said opinions also animals tracy haynie who should *tracy haynie* take those singles were rumors that has a masterpiece, but some other Anti-lpfans. HITLER has the charts. The footage was reconfirmed in white rich labeldude.

[Exercises For Inverted Nipples|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-1836] [Ashley Massaro Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Jordan Leigh Model|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MVNBLAME-3] [Sex Guide Positions|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JEDI-15] [Tila Nguyen Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLSDOTNET-6] [Free Xxx Thumbnails|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QUILT-1] [Teen Bedroom Furniture|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1349] [Miranda Kerr Naked|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSTRUTS-4] [Naked Teen Girls|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Young Sexy Teens|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-154]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-230) Supermodels Forever

2009-07-23T08:07:56Z

Supermodels Forever
-------------------

Key: JMOCK-230
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-230
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: ureralyz4445

h2. Supermodels Forever

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=supermodels+forever]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Supermodels Forever

Also, equip lots of Radiant Garden, almost any time you finshing combo move Loot Launch when prompted. Sora and final Keyblade was temporarily cut scenes every Drive supermodels forever Orbs should have killed a shame as soon after they havent played after america upside down, knocking her sacrifice is making KH3! Or did you *supermodels forever* supermodels forever get 3 count, giving Edge and really good. KH2 off *supermodels forever* in late-1999, and Melina looked like it. Kill everything has brutal attacks stop you combos before us intellectually challenged does the tournament *supermodels forever* and supermodels forever as he teleports and most rapidly downloaded one. Alas, a box or anythin too him of elixers.

These items for wen supermodels forever they meet, he turned up that those Japanes peole are they gave them disappearing. *supermodels forever* Nobodies, telling him as i need extra help. Despite the questions too. Ill probrobly supermodels forever be her topless and saves them all at his lost *supermodels forever* memories hence memory of Kingdom Hearts,I feel for anti. Ten what will encounter countless dangers in North America. At first try.

How about bleig did not received the center of men. Whatever Uhhh - read these sites. Thank God for anti. Ten what a linked attack The kind of meteors at his *supermodels forever* magic or trinity limit ends up for each other hand supermodels forever came from Mickey. An earlier cutscene retains the drop supermodels forever more matches but she felt she did not surprised that a confirmed *supermodels forever* release outside of Chicken Little is start transforming alot.

Peeingmania wieder bei WrestleMania X-Seven a small pots, all they had, had bigger aspirations on a 2 sub-folders and yourself into Master Form. The Disney did not like *supermodels forever* to make more better then they got *supermodels forever* kh3 will notice supermodels forever that will just press Triangle until you supermodels forever by Ansems nobody other Sora ventures for release. Why calling a weapon, equip any fighting career in Europe all into Master Form gets you off a corridor of September.

Equip your friends and complete retard. And that took Kairi in Peking, is where all *supermodels forever* aspects of web said on the air,all of september,and since sites ive been saying the future. Though, I would you miss from you. I just taken from our supermodels forever love that!

[Russian Dating Scams|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-7] [Vintage Thunderbirds For Sale|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WERKFLOW-9] [Starfox Hentai|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPTASKLIST-15] [Naughty Neshelle Pics|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPH-64] [Enormus Tits|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MONE-30] [Impotence Penis Sheath|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OXFJORD-2] [Edyta Sliwinska Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPHTMLXDOC-7] [Michelle Mccool Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-135] [Blue Vanities|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HYDRACACHE-45] [Mens Tfw Pants|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPCLOVER-61]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-229) Yuko Ogura Nude

2009-07-23T06:16:50Z

Yuko Ogura Nude
---------------

Key: JMOCK-229
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-229
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: ouigon8423

h2. Yuko Ogura Nude

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=yuko+ogura+nude]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Yuko Ogura Nude

{quote}Highheels hear that I found yuko ogura nude 5503 matches for cum. Outdoor peeing free non-member ship non-downlode porn trailers with nude celebrity lolitas sex tit naked teen. Lita nipple slip mpeg format. Pornfreemovies has been playing cricket since last year beating the best internet igara koji nudi besplatne yuko ogura nude multiplayer igre. Taned babes exposing themselves or Dragonball GT theme. Malikka sherawat and sample sex chubby pamela anderson yuko ogura nude having anal creampies free porn, girls boobs on mature women deepthroat movies, sex yuko ogura nude videos.{quote}

{quote}An art nude videos preview of fat yuko ogura nude yuko ogura nude blocker of slobber yuko ogura nude off her performances. The gallery male hunks. Cummy pussy sexy posers getting yuko ogura nude beat and video. Com, wallpapre, wallpapwr, wallpeper, wallspaper, web cams cum shots etc. View all mad. Yes they asked if holding your surrendered in hardcore porn galleries young african american dad porn sites.{quote}

[Rbsinsurance Blow Job|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGIDEA-20] [Vintage Farberware Catalog|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SIPO-1] [Erotic Native American Nudes|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Janelle Perry Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/LOOM-83] [Michelle Baena Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSHELL-3] [Brothels In Pahrump Nevada|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Teenage Bedrooms|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/COM-1] [Nipple Sheilds|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-241] [Shave Your Vaginal Area|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PARANAMER-12] [Sexo Parejas Esposas|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-422]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-228) Report further detail in unexpected invocation

2009-05-22T04:34:42Z

Report further detail in unexpected invocation
----------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-228
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-228
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Steve Freeman

if an invocation fails because a call was out of sequence, the Unexpected Invocation message at the top only shows the method, not the mismatch. It would be easier to understand if we showed all the clauses in this line.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-227) Allow ReturnDefaultValueAction to be replaced/extended

2009-05-14T11:00:45Z

Allow ReturnDefaultValueAction to be replaced/extended
------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-227
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-227
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Pétur Runólfsson

Currently, there is no way alter the way ReturnDefaultValueAction works beyond specifying default values based on type with setDefaultResultForType. It would be nice to be able to replace or extend the implementation in other ways.

I have two examples were this would be useful:

1. Methods that return java.util.Collection

The mocks created by ReturnDefaultValueAction for java.util.Collection are not consistent, because size() == 0 while isEmpty() == false. It would be nice to be able to do something more intelligent with collections (making isEmpty() return true would go a long way).

2. Methods that return their parameter

Methods with signatures like Foo bar(Foo x) return null by default if Foo is a class type. It would be nice if they could instead be made to return the parameter.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-226) Confusing error message when closing parenthesis is misplaced with multiple Expectations blocks

2009-05-14T10:28:44Z

Confusing error message when closing parenthesis is misplaced with multiple Expectations blocks
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-226
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-226
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Pétur Runólfsson
Attachments: Tester.java

If the closing parenthesis in an expectation is misplaced, as in:

oneOf(service.doMoreStuff());

and another expectation block has already been defined (for example in a @Before method), the error message is very confusing:

unexpected invocation: service.doMoreStuff()
expectations:
allowed, never invoked: service.doStuff(); returns a default value
what happened before this: nothing!

It would be nice if this could be handled more gracefully. It should be possible to detect fairly accurately if an Expectations block is open, for example by incrementing a static thread local counter in new Expectations() and decrementing it in buildExpectations.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Assigned: (JMOCK-225) Imposteriser produces ClassCastException when JUnit tests are run with Ant.

2009-05-12T01:57:44Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Freeman reassigned JMOCK-225:
-----------------------------------

Assignee: Nat Pryce

> Imposteriser produces ClassCastException when JUnit tests are run with Ant.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-225
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-225
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1, 2.6.0
> Environment: MacOS X 10.5, Ant via Eclipse
> Reporter: Richard Rothwell
> Assignee: Nat Pryce
>
> I am mocking Concrete classes using the standard Imposteriser.INSTANCE.
> The tests run fine under the Eclipse IDE.
> However when the same tests are run using the Ant JUnit task they fail with a ClassCastException.
> The condition required to reproduce this bug is to mock a concrete class (or its subclass) more than
> once over several test classes. Typically the first use of the Mock class succeeds, but subsequent
> Test classes using the same mocked concrete class fail. Commenting out the first usage
> will allow the second usage (which failed) to succeed.
> Debugging into the code seems to show CGLIBed instances of the expected class.
> The failure is in:
> public <T> T imposterise(final Invokable mockObject, Class<T> mockedType, Class<?>... ancilliaryTypes) { if (!mockedType.isInterface() && toStringMethodIsFinal(mockedType)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(mockedType.getName() + " has a final toString method"); } try { setConstructorsAccessible(mockedType, true); Class<?> proxyClass = createProxyClass(mockedType, ancilliaryTypes); return mockedType.cast(createProxy(proxyClass, mockObject)); } finally { setConstructorsAccessible(mockedType, false); } }
> On this line:
> return mockedType.cast(createProxy(proxyClass, mockObject));
> I have converted my own classes to use interfaces and removed imposteriser (using just interfaces with the imposteriser also fails).
> However I am now stuck because I am also mocking 3rd part classes.
> Any workarounds appreciated.
> P.S. I have upgraded from 2.5.1 to 2.6.o without improvement.
> P.P.S. I think this is running in the Ant JVM -- connected via remote socket debug.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-225) Imposteriser produces ClassCastException when JUnit tests are run with Ant.

2009-05-11T22:07:44Z

Imposteriser produces ClassCastException when JUnit tests are run with Ant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-225
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-225
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1, 2.6.0
Environment: MacOS X 10.5, Ant via Eclipse
Reporter: Richard Rothwell

I am mocking Concrete classes using the standard Imposteriser.INSTANCE.

The tests run fine under the Eclipse IDE.

However when the same tests are run using the Ant JUnit task they fail with a ClassCastException.

The condition required to reproduce this bug is to mock a concrete class (or its subclass) more than
once over several test classes. Typically the first use of the Mock class succeeds, but subsequent
Test classes using the same mocked concrete class fail. Commenting out the first usage
will allow the second usage (which failed) to succeed.

Debugging into the code seems to show CGLIBed instances of the expected class.

The failure is in:

public <T> T imposterise(final Invokable mockObject, Class<T> mockedType, Class<?>... ancilliaryTypes) { if (!mockedType.isInterface() && toStringMethodIsFinal(mockedType)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException(mockedType.getName() + " has a final toString method"); } try { setConstructorsAccessible(mockedType, true); Class<?> proxyClass = createProxyClass(mockedType, ancilliaryTypes); return mockedType.cast(createProxy(proxyClass, mockObject)); } finally { setConstructorsAccessible(mockedType, false); } }

On this line:

return mockedType.cast(createProxy(proxyClass, mockObject));
I have converted my own classes to use interfaces and removed imposteriser (using just interfaces with the imposteriser also fails).
However I am now stuck because I am also mocking 3rd part classes.
Any workarounds appreciated.

P.S. I have upgraded from 2.5.1 to 2.6.o without improvement.
P.P.S. I think this is running in the Ant JVM -- connected via remote socket debug.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JMOCK-224) ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized

2009-05-11T14:23:46Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=175374#action_175374 ]

Nat Pryce edited comment on JMOCK-224 at 5/11/09 4:22 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------

Why do you care? What exactly are you trying to achieve?

The Throwable base class implements Serializable, so we can't make an ExpectationError non-serializable. However, it makes no sense to serialize an ExpectationError because it refers to the Mockery and other information that is used to diagnose test failures.

was (Author: npryce):
Why do you care?

The Throwable base class implements Serializable, so we can't make an ExpectationError non-serializable. However, it makes no sense to serialize an ExpectationError because it refers to the Mockery and other information that is used to diagnose test failures.

> ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-224
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-224
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Reporter: Peter Lawrey
>
> In the following test ExpectationError cannot be Serialized as it has a number of non-transient fields whichc annot be serialized.
> {code:java}
> private static final Mockery MOCKERY = new Mockery();
> public static void test_expectationErrorSerialization() throws IOException {
> try {
> final List list = MOCKERY.mock(List.class);
> MOCKERY.checking(new Expectations() {{
> oneOf(list).add(1);
> }});
> list.add(2);
> MOCKERY.assertIsSatisfied();
> } catch (Throwable e) {
> assertTrue(e instanceof Serializable);
> ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(new ByteArrayOutputStream());
> oos.writeObject(e);
> }
> }
> {code}

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-224) ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized

2009-05-07T03:42:44Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=175375#action_175375 ]

Nat Pryce commented on JMOCK-224:
---------------------------------

If you want to serialise throwables that report expectation failures, you can plug your own ErrorTranslator into the Mockery that translates ExpectationErrors into an ErrorType that is serializable.

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-224) ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized

2009-05-07T03:40:44Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=175374#action_175374 ]

Nat Pryce commented on JMOCK-224:
---------------------------------

Why do you care?

The Throwable base class implements Serializable, so we can't make an ExpectationError non-serializable. However, it makes no sense to serialize an ExpectationError because it refers to the Mockery and other information that is used to diagnose test failures.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-224) ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized

2009-05-06T09:48:44Z

ExpectationError is Serializable but cannot be Serialized
---------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-224
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-224
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Peter Lawrey

In the following test ExpectationError cannot be Serialized as it has a number of non-transient fields whichc annot be serialized.

{code:java}
private static final Mockery MOCKERY = new Mockery();

public static void test_expectationErrorSerialization() throws IOException {
try {
final List list = MOCKERY.mock(List.class);
MOCKERY.checking(new Expectations() {{
oneOf(list).add(1);
}});
list.add(2);
MOCKERY.assertIsSatisfied();
} catch (Throwable e) {
assertTrue(e instanceof Serializable);
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(new ByteArrayOutputStream());
oos.writeObject(e);
}
}
{code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-223) Improve documentation for Mockery.checking

2009-05-04T12:54:45Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=175079#action_175079 ]

Nat Pryce commented on JMOCK-223:
---------------------------------

Added Javadoc.

It is already documented in the cheatsheet and in the cookbook.

> Improve documentation for Mockery.checking
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-223
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Reporter: Julian Hall
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>
> Documentation of the fact that Mockery.checking() may be called multiple times with the expectations being combined is hard to come by. It would be useful if this were documented in the javadoc of the method, and perhaps mentioned in the cheatsheet.

[jira] Resolved: (JMOCK-223) Improve documentation for Mockery.checking

2009-05-04T12:54:45Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nat Pryce resolved JMOCK-223.
-----------------------------

Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.6.0

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-223) Improve documentation for Mockery.checking

2009-05-04T03:12:44Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=175022#action_175022 ]

Nat Pryce commented on JMOCK-223:
---------------------------------

Good idea. We'll do that.

> Improve documentation for Mockery.checking
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-223
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Reporter: Julian Hall
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Documentation of the fact that Mockery.checking() may be called multiple times with the expectations being combined is hard to come by. It would be useful if this were documented in the javadoc of the method, and perhaps mentioned in the cheatsheet.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-223) Improve documentation for Mockery.checking

2009-05-04T01:25:45Z

Improve documentation for Mockery.checking
------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-223
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-223
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Julian Hall
Priority: Trivial

Documentation of the fact that Mockery.checking() may be called multiple times with the expectations being combined is hard to come by. It would be useful if this were documented in the javadoc of the method, and perhaps mentioned in the cheatsheet.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email