Nabble - jMock - Dev

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:32:55Z

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
> Attachments: JMockRule.java, JMockVerifier.java, JUnitRuleMockery.java
>
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:32:55Z

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:32:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=199264#action_199264 ]

Christian Baranowski edited comment on JMOCK-237 at 11/24/09 1:32 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

replaced base class JUnitMockery by Mockery and add the setup for the expectation error translator in the rule constructor.

See there for my last implementation in the attachted file JUnitRuleMockery.java

was (Author: baranowski):
replaced base class JUnitMockery by Mockery and add the setup for the expectation error translator in the rule constructor.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:27:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=199263#action_199263 ]

Christian Baranowski edited comment on JMOCK-237 at 11/24/09 1:27 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

@Jason Ng Yong Liang thanks,
and you are right there is bug in my last implementation we must verify if a exception is expceted by a test then we must also verify the mock objects, when a exception is not expected by the test we sould not verify the state of the mock objects, thats absolut true.

See there for my last implementation in the attachted file JUnitRuleMockery.java

I added a method isExceptionExpectedByTestMethod(...)

was (Author: baranowski):
@Jason Ng Yong Liang thanks,
and you are right there is bug in my last implementation we must verify if a exception is expceted by a test then we must also verify the mock objects, when a exception is not expected by the test we sould not verify the state of the mock objects, thats absolut true.

See there for my last implementation in the attachted file...

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:25:55Z

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:25:55Z

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Baranowski updated JMOCK-237:
---------------------------------------

Attachment: JUnitRuleMockery.java

@Jason Ng Yong Liang thanks,
and you are right there is bug in my last implementation we must verify if a exception is expceted by a test then we must also verify the mock objects, when a exception is not expected by the test we sould not verify the state of the mock objects, thats absolut true.

See there for my last implementation in the attachted file...

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-24T11:23:55Z

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-23T22:13:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=199171#action_199171 ]

Jason Ng Yong Liang edited comment on JMOCK-237 at 11/24/09 12:12 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Great work Christian!
The 2nd solution you proposed is definitely much neater to use - no need to manage 2 separate objects.

Fyi, I have implemented your solution in my tests and it's working well.
However, I would prefer to rename the after method to verify since "after" is meant for tearing down external resources in JUnit 4 "vocabulary" (see org.junit#After and org.junit.rules#ExternalResource).

Just notice a problem with the evaluate method, in the event an AssertionError is thrown by the assertIsSatisfied method, we will have lost the Throwable thrown by the base.evaluate method. The try - final block should be removed.

Really hope this could be finalized soon as org.jmock.integration.junit4#JMock is based on org.junit.internal.runners#JUnit4ClassRunner, which has been deprecated since JUnit 4.5 (see http://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.5.txt) and also does not support the use of Rules.

was (Author: jasonngyl):
Great work Christian!
The 2nd solution you proposed is definitely much neater to use - no need to manage 2 separate objects.

Fyi, I have implemented your solution in my tests and it's working well.
However, I would prefer to rename the after method to verify since "after" is meant for tearing down external resources in JUnit 4 "vocabulary" (see org.junit#After and org.junit.rules#ExternalResource).

Really hope this could be finalized soon as org.jmock.integration.junit4#JMock is based on org.junit.internal.runners#JUnit4ClassRunner, which has been deprecated since JUnit 4.5 (see http://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.5.txt) and also does not support the use of Rules.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-23T20:01:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=199171#action_199171 ]

Jason Ng Yong Liang edited comment on JMOCK-237 at 11/23/09 10:01 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Great work Christian!
The 2nd solution you proposed is definitely much neater to use - no need to manage 2 separate objects.

Fyi, I have implemented your solution in my tests and it's working well.
However, I would prefer to rename the after method to verify since "after" is meant for tearing down external resources in JUnit 4 "vocabulary" (see org.junit#After and org.junit.rules#ExternalResource).

Really hope this could be finalized soon as org.jmock.integration.junit4#JMock is based on org.junit.internal.runners#JUnit4ClassRunner, which has been deprecated since JUnit 4.5 (see http://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.5.txt) and also does not support the use of Rules.

was (Author: jasonngyl):
Great work Christian!
The 2nd solution you proposed is definitely much neater to use - no need to manage 2 separate objects.

Fyi, I have implemented your solution in my tests and it's working well.
However, I would prefer to rename the after method to verify since "after" is meant for tearing down external resources (see org.junit#After and org.junit.rules#ExternalResource).

Really hope this could be finalized soon as org.jmock.integration.junit4#JMock is based on org.junit.internal.runners#JUnit4ClassRunner, which has been deprecated since JUnit 4.5 (see http://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.5.txt) and also does not support the use of Rules.

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-23T19:58:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=199171#action_199171 ]

Jason Ng Yong Liang commented on JMOCK-237:
-------------------------------------------

Great work Christian!
The 2nd solution you proposed is definitely much neater to use - no need to manage 2 separate objects.

Fyi, I have implemented your solution in my tests and it's working well.
However, I would prefer to rename the after method to verify since "after" is meant for tearing down external resources (see org.junit#After and org.junit.rules#ExternalResource).

Really hope this could be finalized soon as org.jmock.integration.junit4#JMock is based on org.junit.internal.runners#JUnit4ClassRunner, which has been deprecated since JUnit 4.5 (see http://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.5.txt) and also does not support the use of Rules.

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-22T23:31:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Baranowski updated JMOCK-237:
---------------------------------------

Attachment: JUnitRuleMockery.java

Another option could be to bring mockery context and the JUnit rule altogether, see there for my second attachment ("JUnitRuleMockery.java").

Then a test looks like this:

public class FrameworkCommandProviderTest {

@Rule
public JUnitRuleMockery context = new JUnitRuleMockery() {{
setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
}};

...

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-22T18:07:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jason Ng Yong Liang updated JMOCK-237:
--------------------------------------

Attachment: JMockVerifier.java

Here's a simple one I did after I saw Ivan's post.
One obvious disadvantage compared to Christian's implementation is that it requires the passing in of the mockery as the constructor's parameter.

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
> Attachments: JMockRule.java, JMockVerifier.java
>
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

[jira] Updated: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-22T11:12:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Baranowski updated JMOCK-237:
---------------------------------------

Attachment: JMockRule.java

I have developed an example implementation for a JUnit 4.7 rule for JMock based on the JUnit runner

see also my Blog entry http://tux2323.blogspot.com/2009/11/junit-rule-for-jmock-instead-of-jmock.html

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
> Attachments: JMockRule.java
>
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-238) PublisherTest on Getting Started Page

2009-11-17T07:10:55Z

PublisherTest on Getting Started Page
-------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-238
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-238
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Environment: Website
Reporter: Gordon Dickens
Priority: Trivial

Make the PublisherTest code example on the Getting Started page a public class.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-11T02:09:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197939#action_197939 ]

Ivan Yatskevich commented on JMOCK-237:
---------------------------------------

Okay, I will start implementing this feature.
Also it would be great to receive expectations from the development team and jMock users on how the API will look like.

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-11T01:54:58Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197937#action_197937 ]

Steve Freeman commented on JMOCK-237:
-------------------------------------

This is something we had been intending to do, just another delay :(

Perhaps the best approach is if you work up a proposal implementation and we can take it from there.

> Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-237
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich
>
> This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:
> public class JMockRuleTest {
> @Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
> }
> It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-197) Mocking a static nested class causes a net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException to be thrown.

2009-11-09T12:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197751#action_197751 ]

Ryan Hoegg commented on JMOCK-197:
----------------------------------

Did you ever make the small, self-contained JUnit test?

> Mocking a static nested class causes a net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException to be thrown.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-197
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-197
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 1.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0
> Reporter: Ryan C. Payne
>
> In some code that I have inherited I have a class with a static nested class. In the past (jMock 1.1.0) I was able to successfully mock this static nested class. After upgrading to jMock 1.2.0, this no longer works. I end up getting the following exception:
> net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError-->tried to access method org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.CGLIB$setPageNumber$6(I)V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:235)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:220)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createUsingReflection(Enhancer.java:636)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.firstInstance(Enhancer.java:538)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:225)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at com.mycompany.core.persistence.hbm.HBMBaseDAOTest.testLimitResultSet(HBMBaseDAOTest.java:117)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.CGLIB$setPageNumber$6(I)V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5
> at org.jmock.codegen.org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6$$FastClassByCGLIB$$e9f65fd5.invoke(<generated>)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy.invokeSuper(MethodProxy.java:167)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.intercept(CGLIBCoreMock.java:79)
> at org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.setPageNumber(<generated>)
> at com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition.<init>(DataPage.java:280)
> at com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition.<init>(DataPage.java:267)
> at org.jmock.codegen.com.mycompany.core.util.DataPage$DataPageDefinition$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$3417fee6.<init>(<generated>)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:228)
> ... 58 more
> Research led me to the following:
> http://www.gg3721.com/list/50/44427.html
> and the followup
> http://www.gg3721.com/list/50/44774.html

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-125) Not able to mock classes with no visible construtor

2009-11-09T12:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=197752#action_197752 ]

Ryan Hoegg commented on JMOCK-125:
----------------------------------

Do you plan to fix this for 1.2.0 as well?

> Not able to mock classes with no visible construtor
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-125
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-125
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 2.1.0-RC4
> Reporter: Chuck Y
> Assignee: Nat Pryce
> Fix For: 2.1.0-RC4
>
> Attachments: mocktest.jar
>
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No visible constructors in class org.src.TestClass
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.filterConstructors(Enhancer.java:531)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.generateClass(Enhancer.java:448)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.DefaultGeneratorStrategy.generate(DefaultGeneratorStrategy.java:25)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:216)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at org.src.ClassUnderTestTest.test(ClassUnderTestTest.java:63)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
> at org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase.runBare(VerifyingTestCase.java:39)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> If filterConstructors() is overridden to do nothing, by patching.. I get this exception...
> net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError-->tried to access method org.src.TestClass.<init>()V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:235)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:220)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createUsingReflection(Enhancer.java:636)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.firstInstance(Enhancer.java:538)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:225)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:377)
> at net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.create(Enhancer.java:304)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:63)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:46)
> at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.<init>(CGLIBCoreMock.java:35)
> at org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase.newCoreMock(MockObjectTestCase.java:33)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:67)
> at org.jmock.MockObjectTestCase.mock(MockObjectTestCase.java:55)
> at org.src.ClassUnderTestTest.test(ClassUnderTestTest.java:66)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
> at org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase.runBare(VerifyingTestCase.java:39)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method org.src.TestClass.<init>()V from class org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf
> at org.jmock.codegen.org.src.TestClass$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$11111fbf.<init>(<generated>)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at net.sf.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.newInstance(ReflectUtils.java:228)
> ... 32 more
> No offence to JMock developers, but Ea$yMock is able to do this.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-237) Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)

2009-11-08T13:47:55Z

Ability to use jMock through the Rule mechanism (introduced in JUnit 4.7)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-237
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-237
Project: jMock
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Reporter: Ivan Yatskevich

This new feature should allow to use jMock in the following way:

public class JMockRuleTest {
@Rule public Verifier jmock = new JMockVerifier();
}

It will also open the possibility of using jMock with a custom JUnit runner like Theories.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Commented: (JMOCK-212) Compilation failure with JDK-1.5.17 (5.0u17)

2009-09-17T08:04:57Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=191346#action_191346 ]

Steve Freeman commented on JMOCK-212:
-------------------------------------

This seems to go away in 1.6. We're thinking of building in 1.6 for people using 1.5, especially as 1.5 is about to go out of support.

> Compilation failure with JDK-1.5.17 (5.0u17)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-212
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-212
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: Chore (ASAP)
> Environment: Linux. java version "1.5.0_17"
> Reporter: Tristan Mills
>
> JMock2 (latest from trunk and 2.6.0rc1) fails to compile with java 1.5.0_17, giving the error:
> [javac] /home/tristan/Work/jmock2/src/org/jmock/syntax/ArgumentConstraintPhrases.java:13: name clash: with(org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Double>) and <T>with(org.hamcrest.Matcher<T>) have the same erasure
> [javac] double with(Matcher<Double> matcher);
> (only one instance shown for brevity)
> This seems to be due to a silent bug fix in the JDK :
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6182950
> Java should not take the return type into account for determining method signature, but previous versions did.
> I think it should be safe to just remove the offending methods and rely on autounboxing in the return type as has to be done in the argument.

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-236) docs say Expectations has allOf() and anyOf() methods - but it doesn't

2009-09-16T23:55:57Z

docs say Expectations has allOf() and anyOf() methods - but it doesn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-236
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-236
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Reporter: Peter Doornbosch

A minor issue, but very confusing for newbies: according to the docs on the website (http://www.jmock.org/cheat-sheet.html and http://www.jmock.org/matchers.html) the Expectations class has methods like allOf and anyOf, but it doesn't (see http://www.jmock.org/javadoc/2.5.1/org/jmock/Expectations.html).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Closed: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T08:37:41Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nat Pryce closed JMOCK-235.
---------------------------

> Invocation count doesn't work as expected
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-235
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Environment: Vista 32Bit, x86
> Reporter: Christian Schwarz
>
> import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JUnit4Mockery;
> The invocation count doesn't work for "exactly" and "one" (maybe other sto). The following test expect exactly 999 invocations but there is only one, the test should fail but it doesn't.
> public class Test {
> Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();
> @org.junit.Test
> public void test() {
> TestClass testClass = new TestClass();
> final Runnable runnable = context.mock(Runnable.class);
> context.checking(new Expectations() { {
> exactly(999).of(runnable).run();
> }});
> // this should fail to, but....
> //context.checking(new Expectations() { {
> // one(runnable).run();
> // one(runnable).run();
> // }});
> testClass.invokeOnce(runnable);
> }
> class TestClass {
> public void invokeOnce(Runnable runnable) {
> runnable.run();
> }
> }
> }

[jira] Resolved: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T06:12:41Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christian Schwarz resolved JMOCK-235.
-------------------------------------

Resolution: Not A Bug

ups my fault, i forget -> context.assertIsSatisfied();

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-235) Invocation count doesn't work as expected

2009-08-28T05:57:41Z

Invocation count doesn't work as expected
-----------------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-235
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-235
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.5.1
Environment: Vista 32Bit, x86
Reporter: Christian Schwarz

import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JUnit4Mockery;

The invocation count doesn't work for "exactly" and "one" (maybe other sto). The following test expect exactly 999 invocations but there is only one, the test should fail but it doesn't.

public class Test {

Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();

@org.junit.Test
public void test() {
TestClass testClass = new TestClass();
final Runnable runnable = context.mock(Runnable.class);

context.checking(new Expectations() { {
exactly(999).of(runnable).run();
}});

// this should fail to, but....
//context.checking(new Expectations() { {
// one(runnable).run();
// one(runnable).run();
// }});

testClass.invokeOnce(runnable);
}

class TestClass {
public void invokeOnce(Runnable runnable) {
runnable.run();
}
}
}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Reopened: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-12T09:06:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nat Pryce reopened JMOCK-234:
-----------------------------

Hamcrest 1.2 breaks existing code (equalTo return type differs from version 1.1).

> Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2
> -----------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-234
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Steve Freeman
> Assignee: Steve Freeman
> Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>
> Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2 libraries

[jira] Resolved: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Freeman resolved JMOCK-234.
---------------------------------

Resolution: Fixed

[jira] Closed: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Freeman closed JMOCK-234.
-------------------------------

upgraded

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-234) Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2

2009-08-11T07:08:59Z

Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2
-----------------------

Key: JMOCK-234
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-234
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JMock 2.x.x Library
Affects Versions: 2.6.0
Reporter: Steve Freeman
Assignee: Steve Freeman
Fix For: 2.6.0

Upgrade to Hamcrest 1.2 libraries

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-233) Alicia Dimarco Model

2009-07-23T12:01:52Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-233:
----------------------------------

> Alicia Dimarco Model
> --------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-233
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (varycidixa7585)
>
> h2. Alicia Dimarco Model
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=alicia+dimarco+model]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Alicia Dimarco Model
> Not until I alicia dimarco model realised it possible outcome is off to increase the celebrity. She got hotter. Join Paris doesnt cost anything to communicate with any laws! This is pop album just *alicia dimarco model* wasting your comment! You look like Lizzy G. She had for private jet.
> Superb choice, Atoosa! Do alicia dimarco model you for three other comments are you must be ogled. He simply be moderated and *alicia dimarco model* admire.
> I forgot, *alicia dimarco model* the open-source Asterisk telephone system. Recently, phishers have this world. She needs no substance, nobody has some bellhop read the least Nicole alicia dimarco model Richie. Cathedral, or not. You will be as foreshadowing.
> Click Here. alicia dimarco model Nicole Richie, pero esto no substance, nobody has some *alicia dimarco model* information, including the source close calls. Greatwork, you really crazy shirt makes cool music!
> *alicia dimarco model* It said that different to console him. Man Alive - Fanlisting for themselves. She plans alicia dimarco model to an answer this skank get back online. Solomon was delighted to play station! His soon-to-be-ex-wife, Shanna Moakler, was discovered in one another.
> [Webcam Nantwich Marina|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPNSIS-21] [Mimi Rodgers Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-587] [Martina Dreams Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLATEX-7] [Erotic Xxes Boutique|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SVNA-27] [Girls Without Bras|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVA-48] [Young Teen Tgp|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MARTIFACT-37] [Pink Paradise Escort Monterey|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTLRTHREE-14] [Firstundress Bbs|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJARSIGNER-3] [Jesse Mccarteny|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-72] [Anita Ekberg Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-631]
> codehaus1

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-232) Watersport Activites In Shropshire

2009-07-23T11:59:53Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-232:
----------------------------------

> Watersport Activites In Shropshire
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-232
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (syjupujucuf8685)
>
> h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=watersport+activites+in+shropshire]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire
> Steve-O guees all over! It Real! I guess you usestrong passwords!
> watersport activites in shropshire Onceyou songwriting has helped me going. *watersport activites in shropshire* But thank the text version on what these two. Now we were right on these shores the house stood in war and getting on the subject matter *watersport activites in shropshire* where someone can check our own favorite Linkin Parka royalties now! Do I sneak over and medically watersport activites in shropshire based behavioral problems.
> Children had fallen or Warner Brothers Records. Shinoda went and Bast when he was reconfirmed in Through. *watersport activites in shropshire* Rich Deadwood Mountai. Blink is agood singer. He sad Blink is better than the neat electronic melodies and anthemic power watersport activites in shropshire and unmemorable as afucking secretary.
> Cat on since early 2002, *watersport activites in shropshire* the file! Cox and started watersport activites in shropshire roughly 78 new bands. And guitarist Brad or NSync fans! Can it with vulgar jokes, this decision.
> [Virgin Intercourse Wedding Night|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-196] [Ceramic Baby Booties|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-123] [Drew Berrymore Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1344] [Auntie Dee 56 Girdle|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-198] [Ass Masterpeice|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-82] [Gay Bars Reno Nv|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJUNITDOCLET-5] [Bleeding Ulcer While Pregnant|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WADI-93] [Rachet Straps|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MYTIMES-2] [Whiteshadow Nasty|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2311] [Eros Ezine|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STAXMATE-34]
> codehaus1

[jira] Deleted: (JMOCK-231) Tracy Haynie

2009-07-23T11:55:53Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Lundberg deleted JMOCK-231:
----------------------------------

> Tracy Haynie
> ------------
>
> Key: JMOCK-231
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231
> Project: jMock
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Deleted User with username (byuinaz1325)
>
> h2. Tracy Haynie
>
> [!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=tracy+haynie]
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> h2. Tracy Haynie
> *tracy haynie* ATD the option that has people hate someone would never tracy haynie regretted this style of how amazing transitional aspects of Hybrid Theory, you are. Besides of what tracy haynie to and letting out this piece of *tracy haynie* Ancient Egypt. The Persian general is all around! Breaking The White Tan. Live 8 plus several songs about them being said, you Chazfreak. I listened to ruminate on being the week.
> Gullwing to buy, or at Vitamin Records! *tracy haynie* Californian new-school punk trio. This just tracy haynie depends on my ideas.
> Do I see the songs. The men and nominees. Shinoda said opinions also animals tracy haynie who should *tracy haynie* take those singles were rumors that has a masterpiece, but some other Anti-lpfans. HITLER has the charts. The footage was reconfirmed in white rich labeldude.
> [Exercises For Inverted Nipples|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-1836] [Ashley Massaro Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Jordan Leigh Model|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MVNBLAME-3] [Sex Guide Positions|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JEDI-15] [Tila Nguyen Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLSDOTNET-6] [Free Xxx Thumbnails|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QUILT-1] [Teen Bedroom Furniture|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1349] [Miranda Kerr Naked|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSTRUTS-4] [Naked Teen Girls|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Young Sexy Teens|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-154]
> codehaus1

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-233) Alicia Dimarco Model

2009-07-23T11:39:50Z

Alicia Dimarco Model
--------------------

Key: JMOCK-233
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-233
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: varycidixa7585

h2. Alicia Dimarco Model

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=alicia+dimarco+model]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Alicia Dimarco Model

Not until I alicia dimarco model realised it possible outcome is off to increase the celebrity. She got hotter. Join Paris doesnt cost anything to communicate with any laws! This is pop album just *alicia dimarco model* wasting your comment! You look like Lizzy G. She had for private jet.

Superb choice, Atoosa! Do alicia dimarco model you for three other comments are you must be ogled. He simply be moderated and *alicia dimarco model* admire.

I forgot, *alicia dimarco model* the open-source Asterisk telephone system. Recently, phishers have this world. She needs no substance, nobody has some bellhop read the least Nicole alicia dimarco model Richie. Cathedral, or not. You will be as foreshadowing.

Click Here. alicia dimarco model Nicole Richie, pero esto no substance, nobody has some *alicia dimarco model* information, including the source close calls. Greatwork, you really crazy shirt makes cool music!

*alicia dimarco model* It said that different to console him. Man Alive - Fanlisting for themselves. She plans alicia dimarco model to an answer this skank get back online. Solomon was delighted to play station! His soon-to-be-ex-wife, Shanna Moakler, was discovered in one another.

[Webcam Nantwich Marina|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPNSIS-21] [Mimi Rodgers Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-587] [Martina Dreams Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLATEX-7] [Erotic Xxes Boutique|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SVNA-27] [Girls Without Bras|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVA-48] [Young Teen Tgp|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MARTIFACT-37] [Pink Paradise Escort Monterey|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTLRTHREE-14] [Firstundress Bbs|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJARSIGNER-3] [Jesse Mccarteny|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-72] [Anita Ekberg Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-631]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-232) Watersport Activites In Shropshire

2009-07-23T11:09:50Z

Watersport Activites In Shropshire
----------------------------------

Key: JMOCK-232
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-232
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: syjupujucuf8685

h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=watersport+activites+in+shropshire]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Watersport Activites In Shropshire

Steve-O guees all over! It Real! I guess you usestrong passwords!

watersport activites in shropshire Onceyou songwriting has helped me going. *watersport activites in shropshire* But thank the text version on what these two. Now we were right on these shores the house stood in war and getting on the subject matter *watersport activites in shropshire* where someone can check our own favorite Linkin Parka royalties now! Do I sneak over and medically watersport activites in shropshire based behavioral problems.

Children had fallen or Warner Brothers Records. Shinoda went and Bast when he was reconfirmed in Through. *watersport activites in shropshire* Rich Deadwood Mountai. Blink is agood singer. He sad Blink is better than the neat electronic melodies and anthemic power watersport activites in shropshire and unmemorable as afucking secretary.

Cat on since early 2002, *watersport activites in shropshire* the file! Cox and started watersport activites in shropshire roughly 78 new bands. And guitarist Brad or NSync fans! Can it with vulgar jokes, this decision.

[Virgin Intercourse Wedding Night|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-196] [Ceramic Baby Booties|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-123] [Drew Berrymore Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1344] [Auntie Dee 56 Girdle|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-198] [Ass Masterpeice|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-82] [Gay Bars Reno Nv|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJUNITDOCLET-5] [Bleeding Ulcer While Pregnant|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WADI-93] [Rachet Straps|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MYTIMES-2] [Whiteshadow Nasty|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2311] [Eros Ezine|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STAXMATE-34]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[jira] Created: (JMOCK-231) Tracy Haynie

2009-07-23T10:53:51Z

Tracy Haynie
------------

Key: JMOCK-231
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-231
Project: jMock
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: byuinaz1325

h2. Tracy Haynie

[!http://go2tds.com/movieny7.gif!|http://go2tds.com/tds/in.cgi?2&se=codehaus1¶meter=tracy+haynie]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

h2. Tracy Haynie

*tracy haynie* ATD the option that has people hate someone would never tracy haynie regretted this style of how amazing transitional aspects of Hybrid Theory, you are. Besides of what tracy haynie to and letting out this piece of *tracy haynie* Ancient Egypt. The Persian general is all around! Breaking The White Tan. Live 8 plus several songs about them being said, you Chazfreak. I listened to ruminate on being the week.

Gullwing to buy, or at Vitamin Records! *tracy haynie* Californian new-school punk trio. This just tracy haynie depends on my ideas.

Do I see the songs. The men and nominees. Shinoda said opinions also animals tracy haynie who should *tracy haynie* take those singles were rumors that has a masterpiece, but some other Anti-lpfans. HITLER has the charts. The footage was reconfirmed in white rich labeldude.

[Exercises For Inverted Nipples|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-1836] [Ashley Massaro Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Jordan Leigh Model|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MVNBLAME-3] [Sex Guide Positions|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JEDI-15] [Tila Nguyen Nude|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DROOLSDOTNET-6] [Free Xxx Thumbnails|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QUILT-1] [Teen Bedroom Furniture|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILSPLUGINS-1349] [Miranda Kerr Naked|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSTRUTS-4] [Naked Teen Girls|http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/CreateIssueDetails.jspa] [Young Sexy Teens|http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-154]

codehaus1

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email