kubuntu9.10

[Thomas Zander-7]

I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them against
Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).

Can someone please tell me kubuntu didn't really ship the koffice compiled
against the Qt4.6-TechnicalPreview ?

bugs; 213397, 213647, 213648

I think I'm just going to close them as invalid.
I would also really like to know how end users got their hands on an alpha
release of Qt, it feels so much like kde4.0.0 all over again :(
--
Thomas Zander
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

On Sunday 08 November 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:

> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them against
> Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).
>
> Can someone please tell me kubuntu didn't really ship the koffice compiled
> against the Qt4.6-TechnicalPreview ?
>
> bugs; 213397, 213647, 213648
>
> I think I'm just going to close them as invalid.
> I would also really like to know how end users got their hands on an alpha
> release of Qt, it feels so much like kde4.0.0 all over again :(
>

I got something similar from a krita user yesterday :-(

--
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them
> against Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).

The package dependencies for KWord (version 2.02) say that qt >= 4.5.1
is required.  The version of Qt which ships with 9.10 is
"4.5.3really4.5.2".
This only refers to the dependencies though - not necessarily the
version that the software was actually compiled against - how can I
find out?

Regards,
Robert.

2009/11/8 Boudewijn Rempt <boud@...>:

> On Sunday 08 November 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:
>> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them against
>> Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).
>>
>> Can someone please tell me kubuntu didn't really ship the koffice compiled
>> against the Qt4.6-TechnicalPreview ?
>>
>> bugs; 213397, 213647, 213648
>>
>> I think I'm just going to close them as invalid.
>> I would also really like to know how end users got their hands on an alpha
>> release of Qt, it feels so much like kde4.0.0 all over again :(
>>
>
> I got something similar from a krita user yesterday :-(
>
> --
> Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@...
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
>

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

Ah - report #213397 mentions that the user is using the 'Kubuntu
Experimental' repository, which is shipping a newer version of KWord
(2.1 RC1) compiled against a newer Qt than the one which ships with
stock Ubuntu 9.10.

Regards,
Robert.

2009/11/8 Robert Knight <robertknight@...>:

>> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them
>> against Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).
>
> The package dependencies for KWord (version 2.02) say that qt >= 4.5.1
> is required.  The version of Qt which ships with 9.10 is
> "4.5.3really4.5.2".
> This only refers to the dependencies though - not necessarily the
> version that the software was actually compiled against - how can I
> find out?
>
> Regards,
> Robert.
>
> 2009/11/8 Boudewijn Rempt <boud@...>:
>> On Sunday 08 November 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:
>>> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them against
>>> Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).
>>>
>>> Can someone please tell me kubuntu didn't really ship the koffice compiled
>>> against the Qt4.6-TechnicalPreview ?
>>>
>>> bugs; 213397, 213647, 213648
>>>
>>> I think I'm just going to close them as invalid.
>>> I would also really like to know how end users got their hands on an alpha
>>> release of Qt, it feels so much like kde4.0.0 all over again :(
>>>
>>
>> I got something similar from a krita user yesterday :-(
>>
>> --
>> Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> koffice-devel mailing list
>> koffice-devel@...
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
>>
>

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[Jonathan Riddell-2]

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 04:37:21PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:

> I got 3 bugreports about KWord from kubuntu 9.10 users. All of them against
> Qt4.6TP (aka the alpha release).
>
> Can someone please tell me kubuntu didn't really ship the koffice compiled
> against the Qt4.6-TechnicalPreview ?
>
> bugs; 213397, 213647, 213648
>
> I think I'm just going to close them as invalid.
> I would also really like to know how end users got their hands on an alpha
> release of Qt, it feels so much like kde4.0.0 all over again :(

They're both in our experimental PPA, which isn't advertised to users
and is clearly described as a testing ground for unfinished packages
so feel free to ignore/close the bug reports.  Christian Mangold
(neverselde) is the packager, I'll ask him what needs to be done
before the KOffice packaging can be moved to our Beta Backports PPA
which is for users who want to try testing.

Sorry for the hassle on your end.

Jonathan

________________________________________________________
38 (1F2) Temple Park Crescent |  jr@...
Edinburgh                     |  http://www.jriddell.org
EH11 1HU, Scotland            |  07941 938912
     Kubuntu  http://www.kubuntu.org  Pure KGX
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@...
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel