|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
leim-list.el and registering input methodsIs there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image? Instead they are registered at run time, even in batch mode: $ strace -o out.strace /usr/bin/emacs-23.1 -Q -batch -f kill-emacs $ grep leim-list.el out.strace stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/site-lisp/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/url/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/textmodes/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/progmodes/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/play/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/org/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/nxml/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/net/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mh-e/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mail/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/language/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/international/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/gnus/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/eshell/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/erc/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emulation/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emacs-lisp/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calendar/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calc/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/obsolete/leim-list.el", 0xbfee0dc8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=26950, ...}) = 0 open("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 read(3, ";;; leim-list.el -- list of LEIM "..., 511) = 511 stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=26950, ...}) = 0 open("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 stat64("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=26950, ...}) = 0 open("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 read(3, ";;; leim-list.el -- list of LEIM "..., 26950) = 26950 readlink("/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim/leim-list.el", 0x85489d0, 100) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) Wouldn't it be better if all these things where done before dumping? |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methods> Is there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image?
Probably a remnant from the days where leim was distributed separately from Emacs. It would be good to move it to dump time. But please be careful to still make it possible to have additional input-methods recognized at startup (not sure how it's supposed to work currently, so maybe there's nothing special to do for that). Stefan |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methodsStefan Monnier <monnier@...> writes:
> > Is there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image? > > Probably a remnant from the days where leim was distributed separately > from Emacs. It would be good to move it to dump time. Good. I'll open a bug for this, I don't know enough about how this stuff works to do it myself. > But please be > careful to still make it possible to have additional input-methods > recognized at startup (not sure how it's supposed to work currently, so > maybe there's nothing special to do for that). Currently there's a search for leim-list.el in load-path (see the strace log in my original message). Shouldn't this search be more restricted, like what we do for site-start.el and default.el? |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methodsIn article <200910210708.n9L78Qkg004553@...>, Dan Nicolaescu <dann@...> writes:
> Is there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image? > Instead they are registered at run time, even in batch mode: For those having their own input methods. They can have their own leim-list.el in somewhere in the load-path. But, I think there's no reason to search these directories: /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/url/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/textmodes/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/progmodes/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/play/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/org/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/nxml/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/net/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mh-e/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mail/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/language/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/international/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/gnus/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/eshell/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/erc/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emulation/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emacs-lisp/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calendar/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calc/ /usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/obsolete/ So... > Currently there's a search for leim-list.el in load-path (see the strace > log in my original message). > Shouldn't this search be more restricted, like what we do for > site-start.el and default.el? I agree. But, we must also search the directories added to load-path by users. --- Kenichi Handa handa@... |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methodsStefan Monnier <monnier@...> writes:
> > Is there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image? > > Probably a remnant from the days where leim was distributed separately > from Emacs. It would be good to move it to dump time. But please be > careful to still make it possible to have additional input-methods > recognized at startup (not sure how it's supposed to work currently, so > maybe there's nothing special to do for that). Here's one way to do this: check in the current emacs/leim/leim-list.el to emacs/lisp/builtin-leim-list.el (or a better name?), and change the emacs/leim/Makefile.in to build a file with a different name. Whenever emacs/leim/* changes, then emacs/leim/builtin-leim-list.el needs to be updated (like we do with ldefs-boot.el). OK to check in something like this? |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methods> Here's one way to do this: check in the current emacs/leim/leim-list.el
> to emacs/lisp/builtin-leim-list.el (or a better name?), Of course not: it's a generated file and there's no reason to keep it in the CVS. But renaming it is perfectly fine, yes. Stefan |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methodsStefan Monnier <monnier@...> writes:
> > Here's one way to do this: check in the current emacs/leim/leim-list.el > > to emacs/lisp/builtin-leim-list.el (or a better name?), > > Of course not: it's a generated file and there's no reason to keep it > in the CVS. But renaming it is perfectly fine, yes. The reason to check it in is that there's a bootstrap problem with it: it gets created after dumping emacs, and we want to put the file in the dumped image. |
|
|
Re: leim-list.el and registering input methods>> > Here's one way to do this: check in the current emacs/leim/leim-list.el
>> > to emacs/lisp/builtin-leim-list.el (or a better name?), >> Of course not: it's a generated file and there's no reason to keep it >> in the CVS. But renaming it is perfectly fine, yes. > The reason to check it in is that there's a bootstrap problem with it: > it gets created after dumping emacs, and we want to put the file in the > dumped image. Then we should change the build order so it can be built by src/bootstrap-emacs. Stefan |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |