|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
libgdl 2.27.92 -> 2.28.x: soname bumpI found that libgdl's soname was bumped between 2.27.92 and 2.28 from
2 to 3. This was probably done to reflect the addition of the new enum value to GdlSwitcherStyle. But was this necessary? Did this addition really affect the ABI? I have the following symlinks and an Anjuta built against an older libgdl-1.so.2 starts up properly with a newer libgdl-1.so.3? [rishi@birch ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib/libgdl* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-02 12:57 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-05 15:45 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.2 -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-05 15:45 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.2.0.0 -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-02 12:57 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.3 -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 191732 2009-10-30 21:01 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 [rishi@birch ~]$ I might be wrong. Thanks, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Anjuta-devel mailing list Anjuta-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/anjuta-devel |
|
|
Re: libgdl 2.27.92 -> 2.28.x: soname bumpHi!
Well, actually there was a bug about gdl don't having a soname and thus I added one and I think I bumped it because of some API addition just to be safe. But it's possible that anjuta doesn't use that API at all. Regards, Johannes Am Donnerstag, den 05.11.2009, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Debarshi Ray: > I found that libgdl's soname was bumped between 2.27.92 and 2.28 from > 2 to 3. This was probably done to reflect the addition of the new enum > value to GdlSwitcherStyle. But was this necessary? Did this addition > really affect the ABI? > > I have the following symlinks and an Anjuta built against an older > libgdl-1.so.2 starts up properly with a newer libgdl-1.so.3? > > [rishi@birch ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib/libgdl* > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-02 12:57 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so > -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-05 15:45 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.2 > -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-05 15:45 > /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.2.0.0 -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-02 12:57 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.3 > -> libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 191732 2009-10-30 21:01 /usr/lib/libgdl-1.so.3.0.0 > [rishi@birch ~]$ > > I might be wrong. > > Thanks, > Debarshi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Anjuta-devel mailing list Anjuta-devel@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/anjuta-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |