|

libmemcache vs libmemcached

View: New views

11 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	libmemcache vs libmemcached by Qiangning Hong :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and cons for each of them? -- Qiangning Hong http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Song Du :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Dec 20, 2007 2:10 PM, Qiangning Hong <hongqn@...> wrote: > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > cons for each of them? > > -- > Qiangning Hong > http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ > Hi Qiangning, Not quite sure about the code quality, but obviously the latter one is more up-to-date, feature-rich(cas/append/prepend/consistent hashing) and in active development. -- Regards, Du Song http://www.rollingcode.org/
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by André Cruz-4 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I've tried libmemcache a few months ago and found it pretty unstable... Then I tried apr_memcache which has a memory leak which the developers don't seem to be interested in. I've been using libmemcached for some time and although I've found some bugs, which were quickly fixed, I find it is pretty stable now. Maybe this information should appear in the memcached API page so people choose the "best" C api first. I know I would have liked to have that information when I started. André On 2007/12/20, at 06:10, Qiangning Hong wrote: > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > cons for each of them? > > -- > Qiangning Hong > http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Tim Bunce :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:50:00PM +0800, Du Song wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 2:10 PM, Qiangning Hong <hongqn@...> wrote: > > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached > > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > > cons for each of them? > > Hi Qiangning, > Not quite sure about the code quality, but obviously the latter one is > more up-to-date, feature-rich(cas/append/prepend/consistent hashing) > and in active development. There's also a Perl API in development for it: http://code.google.com/p/perl-libmemcached/ Volunteers welcome. Tim.
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Gavin M. Roy-3 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Our patch for libmemcache to fix a segfault bug with 1.2.2 can be found at: http://area51.myyearbook.com/trac.cgi/browser/patches/libmemcache On 12/20/07, Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@...> wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:50:00PM +0800, Du Song wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 2:10 PM, Qiangning Hong < hongqn@...> wrote: > > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/ > and libmemcached > > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > > cons for each of them? > > Hi Qiangning, > Not quite sure about the code quality, but obviously the latter one is > more up-to-date, feature-rich(cas/append/prepend/consistent hashing) > and in active development. There's also a Perl API in development for it: http://code.google.com/p/perl-libmemcached/ Volunteers welcome. Tim.
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Aaron Stone :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message >From what I've seen, all effort is on libmemcached now. Going forward, it's probably the only C library that will implement the forthcoming binary protocol. Aaron On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 14:10 +0800, Qiangning Hong wrote: > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > cons for each of them? >
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Dustin Sallings :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:52, Aaron Stone wrote: From what I've seen, all effort is on libmemcached now. Going forward, it's probably the only C library that will implement the forthcoming binary protocol. To expand on that slightly, it sounded like Sean was OK killing off libmemcache and merging the projects . Not trying to speak for him too much, but it sounds like he may have grown weary of maintaining libmemcache. -- Dustin Sallings
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Brian Aker-6 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi! Sean came to the most recent hackathon and we worked on adding the one feature he needs so that he can use libmemcached and discard libmemcache. I've not gotten the patch from him but I have pinged him sense the meeting and this is still his intention. The patch deals with using alternative memory allocators, its a good addition. If in your testing you fine something that libmemcached is missing, I would love to hear about it. Cheers, -Brian On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote: > has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache > <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached > <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and > cons for each of them? > > -- > Qiangning Hong > http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ -- _______________________________________________________ Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org Seattle, Washington http://krow.net/ <-- Me http://tangent.org/ <-- Software http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun _______________________________________________________ You can't grep a dead tree.
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Adam Michaels-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Is your client compatible with pgmemcache and other servers that require the library such as lighttpd and mysql's memcached triggers? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Aker" <brian@...> To: "Qiangning Hong" <hongqn@...> Cc: <memcached@...> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:01 PM Subject: Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached > Hi! > > Sean came to the most recent hackathon and we worked on adding the one > feature he needs so that he can use libmemcached and discard libmemcache. > I've not gotten the patch from him but I have pinged him sense the > meeting and this is still his intention. > > The patch deals with using alternative memory allocators, its a good > addition. > > If in your testing you fine something that libmemcached is missing, I > would love to hear about it. > > Cheers, > -Brian > > On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote: > >> has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache >> <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached >> <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and >> cons for each of them? >> >> -- >> Qiangning Hong >> http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org > Seattle, Washington > http://krow.net/ <-- Me > http://tangent.org/ <-- Software > http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun > _______________________________________________________ > You can't grep a dead tree. > > > >
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Dormando :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message http://danga.com/memcached/apis.bml Updated to specify that libmemcache is no longer under active development. No comment on the apr lib (Assume it's fine/supported). I was there when sean and brian were talking about this, so I felt comfy in updating it. -Dormando André Cruz wrote: > I've tried libmemcache a few months ago and found it pretty unstable... > > Then I tried apr_memcache which has a memory leak which the developers > don't seem to be interested in. > > I've been using libmemcached for some time and although I've found some > bugs, which were quickly fixed, I find it is pretty stable now. > > Maybe this information should appear in the memcached API page so people > choose the "best" C api first. I know I would have liked to have that > information when I started. > > André > > On 2007/12/20, at 06:10, Qiangning Hong wrote: > >> has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache >> <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached >> <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and >> cons for each of them? >> >> -- >> Qiangning Hong >> http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ >
	Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached by Brian Aker-6 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi! On Dec 20, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Adam Michaels wrote: > Is your client compatible with pgmemcache and other servers that > require the library such as lighttpd and mysql's memcached triggers? I believe Sean is going to update pgmemecache to use it. This is his main motivator for giving me the memory patch. I won't personally do the pg work, but I will support anyone who does it. Cheers, -Brian > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Aker" <brian@...> > To: "Qiangning Hong" <hongqn@...> > Cc: <memcached@...> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:01 PM > Subject: Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached > > >> Hi! >> >> Sean came to the most recent hackathon and we worked on adding the >> one feature he needs so that he can use libmemcached and discard >> libmemcache. I've not gotten the patch from him but I have pinged >> him sense the meeting and this is still his intention. >> >> The patch deals with using alternative memory allocators, its a >> good addition. >> >> If in your testing you fine something that libmemcached is missing, >> I would love to hear about it. >> >> Cheers, >> -Brian >> >> On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote: >> >>> has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache >>> <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached >>> <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and >>> cons for each of them? >>> >>> -- >>> Qiangning Hong >>> http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/ >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________________ >> Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org >> Seattle, Washington >> http://krow.net/ <-- Me >> http://tangent.org/ <-- Software >> http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun >> _______________________________________________________ >> You can't grep a dead tree. >> >> >> -- _______________________________________________________ Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org Seattle, Washington http://krow.net/ <-- Me http://tangent.org/ <-- Software http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun _______________________________________________________ You can't grep a dead tree.