monodoc Licensing
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
monodoc Licensing
by Jonathan Pryor
::
Rate this Message:
Joshua et al,
You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and apps... Thanks, - Jon _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
|
|
Re: monodoc Licensing
by Joshua Tauberer-4
::
Rate this Message:
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> Joshua et al, > > You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related > utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to > monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. > > The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does > `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. > > How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? > > No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's > licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see > much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and > apps... Hey, Jon. I'm fine with anything, and simplification is my middle name (or, at least, the point of my domain name). You can consider any of my contributions to monodoc in the public domain. Best, -- - Josh Tauberer http://razor.occams.info "Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation! Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation!" Achilles to Tortoise (in "Gödel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas Hofstadter) _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
|
|
Re: monodoc Licensing
by Ben Maurer-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jon,
Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for anything I've written in monodoc. -b On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > Joshua et al, > > You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related > utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to > monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. > > The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does > `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. > > How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? > > No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's > licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see > much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and > apps... > > Thanks, > - Jon > > > > Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
|
|
Re: monodoc Licensing
by Rafael Ferreira-6
::
Rate this Message:
I'm totally ok with MIT/X11.
- raf On 1/25/08, Joshua Tauberer <jit@...> wrote: Jonathan Pryor wrote: -- Uva Software Open Educational Middleware www.uvasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
|
|
Re: monodoc Licensing
by EricButler
::
Rate this Message:
Fine with me too.
- Eric Ben Maurer wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for > anything I've written in monodoc. > > -b > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > >> Joshua et al, >> >> You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related >> utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to >> monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. >> >> The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does >> `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. >> >> How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? >> >> No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's >> licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see >> much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and >> apps... >> >> Thanks, >> - Jon >> >> >> >> Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
|
|
Re: monodoc Licensing
by Mario Sopena Novales-2
::
Rate this Message:
Sorry for answering late but I was on vacation.
Fine for me too On 25/01/2008, Eric Butler <eric@...> wrote: > Fine with me too. > - Eric > > Ben Maurer wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for > > anything I've written in monodoc. > > > > -b > > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > > > >> Joshua et al, > >> > >> You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related > >> utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to > >> monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. > >> > >> The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does > >> `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. > >> > >> How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? > >> > >> No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's > >> licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see > >> much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and > >> apps... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> - Jon > >> > >> > >> > >> > Mono-docs-list maillist - Mono-docs-list@... http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
