|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
new hal policy fileI have an APC usb UPS and the process 'hald-addon-hid-ups' was slowly growing and using up all my RAM (Gentoo stable x86).
I noted that the latest release 3.14.3 installs a new hal policy file so upgraded to in the hope that it would fix things. The policy file syntax was not accepted by hal. I got an error: hald[12708]: error in fdi file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/80-apcupsd-ups-policy.fdi:5: Bad rule: unknown type_match I had a quick scan of the hal documents, and it appears that the first "match" tag has incorrect syntax. Here is my patch 5c5 < <match key="info.addons" type="strlist">hald-addon-hid-ups</match> --- > <match key="info.addons" contains="hald-addon-hid-ups"> Does this make sense? In any case, the process 'hald-addon-hid-ups' does not start anymore, so apcupsd has sole access to the UPS which is what I think was supposed to happen, Andrew Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Apcupsd-users mailing list Apcupsd-users@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apcupsd-users |
|
|
Re: new hal policy fileOn Feb 6, 2008 2:53 PM, Andrew Telford <blaahmail@...> wrote:
> I have an APC usb UPS and the process 'hald-addon-hid-ups' was slowly growing and using up all my RAM (Gentoo stable x86). > > I noted that the latest release 3.14.3 installs a new hal policy file so upgraded to in the hope that it would fix things. The policy file syntax was not accepted by hal. I got an error: > > hald[12708]: error in fdi file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/80-apcupsd-ups-policy.fdi:5: Bad rule: unknown type_match > > I had a quick scan of the hal documents, and it appears that the first "match" tag has incorrect syntax. Here is my patch > > 5c5 > < <match key="info.addons" type="strlist">hald-addon-hid-ups</match> > --- > > <match key="info.addons" contains="hald-addon-hid-ups"> > > Does this make sense? In any case, the process 'hald-addon-hid-ups' does not start anymore, so apcupsd has sole access to the UPS which is what I think was supposed to happen, What version of hald are you running? Maybe they changed the syntax for this. The original syntax is correct and tested on RHEL5. --Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Apcupsd-users mailing list Apcupsd-users@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apcupsd-users |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |