|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
|
|
ognl 2.7.3 performanceDue to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test, the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceMusachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote:
> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just > upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. +1 -Dale --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceSounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released.
On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: > Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. > > +1 > > -Dale > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Wes Wannemacher Author - Struts 2 In Practice Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more http://www.manning.com/wannemacher --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceDale Newfield wrote:
> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. > > +1 Also +1, and I'll have a bit of time this week. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performancecommitted. here are the tickets:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-710 https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3198 Ognl 2.7.3 has a groupid of "ognl" instead of "opensymphony". As a side note, I just noticed that trying to get a value from the ValueStack, whose key(or an intermediate object in the expression) does not exist is an expensive operation, because a new OgnlException is thrown, even when it doesn't make it out of the value stack it is a (unnecessary) performance hit, and it happens very, very often, I am trying to figure out way to avoid it. regards musachy On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Wes Wannemacher<wesw@...> wrote: > Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. > > On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >> +1 >> >> -Dale >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceOn Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote:
> As a side note, I just noticed that trying to get a value from the > ValueStack, whose key(or an intermediate object in the expression) > does not exist is an expensive operation, because a new OgnlException > is thrown, even when it doesn't make it out of the value stack it is a > (unnecessary) performance hit, and it happens very, very often, I am > trying to figure out way to avoid it. meh...not fixable, I would have to do a change on OGNL code. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceI've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems. But when I
saw you guys talking about 2.7.3, I decided to update my library and give it a try, but http://www.ognl.org seems to be gone and the download page on http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl seems to be down as well. Is there somewhere else I should be looking for the updated libraries? (*Chris*) On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote: > > As a side note, I just noticed that trying to get a value from the > > ValueStack, whose key(or an intermediate object in the expression) > > does not exist is an expensive operation, because a new OgnlException > > is thrown, even when it doesn't make it out of the value stack it is a > > (unnecessary) performance hit, and it happens very, very often, I am > > trying to figure out way to avoid it. > > meh...not fixable, I would have to do a change on OGNL code. > > musachy > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceChris Pratt wrote:
> I've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems. But when I > saw you guys talking about 2.7.3, I decided to update my library and give it > a try, but http://www.ognl.org seems to be gone and the download page on > http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl seems to be down as well. Is there > somewhere else I should be looking for the updated libraries? Can always get it from a Maven repo: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/ognl/ognl/ Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceyup, you have to get it from maven repo,
http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/ works for me, but the download page is empty anyway. musachy On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Dave Newton<newton.dave@...> wrote: > Chris Pratt wrote: >> >> I've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems. But when I >> saw you guys talking about 2.7.3, I decided to update my library and give >> it >> a try, but http://www.ognl.org seems to be gone and the download page on >> http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl seems to be down as well. Is there >> somewhere else I should be looking for the updated libraries? > > Can always get it from a Maven repo: > > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/ognl/ognl/ > > Dave > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance+1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement
will satisfy lots of our users... That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) cheers, Rainer > Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. > > On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >> +1 >> >> -Dale >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > -- > Wes Wannemacher > Author - Struts 2 In Practice > Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performancehum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist.
musachy On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> wrote: > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement > will satisfy lots of our users... > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) > > cheers, > Rainer > >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. >> >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> -Dale >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Wes Wannemacher >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > -- > Rainer Hermanns > aixcept > Willibrordstraße 82 > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany > w: http://aixcept.de/ > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceThat may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries
and haven't had any problems. (*Chris*) On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist. > > musachy > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> > wrote: > > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement > > will satisfy lots of our users... > > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) > > > > cheers, > > Rainer > > > >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. > >> > >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: > >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just > >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> -Dale > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Wes Wannemacher > >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice > >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more > >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Rainer Hermanns > > aixcept > > Willibrordstraße 82 > > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany > > w: http://aixcept.de/ > > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 > > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 > > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > > > > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performancethat's good to hear, I haven't tried it yet without that dep.
musachy On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Chris Pratt<thechrispratt@...> wrote: > That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries > and haven't had any problems. > (*Chris*) > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > >> hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist. >> >> musachy >> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> >> wrote: >> > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement >> > will satisfy lots of our users... >> > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) >> > >> > cheers, >> > Rainer >> > >> >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. >> >> >> >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >> >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >> >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >> >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> -Dale >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Wes Wannemacher >> >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >> >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >> >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Rainer Hermanns >> > aixcept >> > Willibrordstraße 82 >> > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> > w: http://aixcept.de/ >> > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceI need some maven black magic support, running mvn dependency:tree,
from apps/blank outputs: [INFO] org.apache.struts:struts2-blank:war:2.1.8-SNAPSHOT [INFO] +- javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.4:provided [INFO] +- javax.servlet:jsp-api:jar:2.0:provided [INFO] +- org.apache.struts:struts2-junit-plugin:jar:2.1.8-SNAPSHOT:test [INFO] | \- org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:test [INFO] +- org.apache.struts:struts2-core:jar:2.1.8-SNAPSHOT:compile [INFO] | +- com.opensymphony:xwork-core:jar:2.1.5-SNAPSHOT:compile [INFO] | | +- commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.4:compile [INFO] | | +- opensymphony:ognl:jar:2.6.11:compile [INFO] | | +- asm:asm:jar:3.1:compile [INFO] | | \- asm:asm-commons:jar:3.1:compile [INFO] | | \- asm:asm-tree:jar:3.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.freemarker:freemarker:jar:2.3.15:compile [INFO] | +- ognl:ognl:jar:2.7.3:compile [INFO] | +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile [INFO] | +- commons-io:commons-io:jar:1.3.2:compile [INFO] | \- com.sun:tools:jar:1.5.0:system [INFO] \- org.springframework:spring-test:jar:2.5.6:test (scope not updated to compile) [INFO] +- commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:test [INFO] \- junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:test but the asm dependency is marked as "optional" in xwork, so it shouldn't be resolved as a transitive dependency, anyone knows what's up here? musachy On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote: > that's good to hear, I haven't tried it yet without that dep. > > musachy > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Chris Pratt<thechrispratt@...> wrote: >> That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries >> and haven't had any problems. >> (*Chris*) >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >> >>> hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist. >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> >>> wrote: >>> > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement >>> > will satisfy lots of our users... >>> > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > Rainer >>> > >>> >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. >>> >> >>> >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >>> >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >>> >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> -Dale >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Wes Wannemacher >>> >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >>> >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >>> >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Rainer Hermanns >>> > aixcept >>> > Willibrordstraße 82 >>> > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >>> > w: http://aixcept.de/ >>> > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >>> > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >>> > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceI am done with the changes in xwork. Whoever can give a hand testing
what is in trunk, this is a good time to jump in :). If everything is ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release. musachy On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote: > Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141 > > Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test, > the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from > 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up > period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode > stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do > some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that > for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just > upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. > > musachy > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceshowcase seems fine. Rainer, whenever you can, get us an xwork release :)
musachy On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote: > I am done with the changes in xwork. Whoever can give a hand testing > what is in trunk, this is a good time to jump in :). If everything is > ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release. > > musachy > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote: >> Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141 >> >> Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test, >> the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from >> 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up >> period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode >> stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do >> some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that >> for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >> musachy >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceMusachy,
thanks! I'll wait for the TextProvider problem to be fixed and then fire up the release process. I start a new gig next week, so this will most likely happen until/over the weekend. Rainer > showcase seems fine. Rainer, whenever you can, get us an xwork release :) > > musachy > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> > wrote: >> I am done with the changes in xwork. Whoever can give a hand testing >> what is in trunk, this is a good time to jump in :). If everything is >> ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release. >> >> musachy >> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> >> wrote: >>> Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141 >>> >>> Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test, >>> the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from >>> 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up >>> period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode >>> stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do >>> some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that >>> for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Willibrordstraße 82 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany w: http://aixcept.de/ t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance2009/7/29 Rainer Hermanns <hermanns@...>:
> thanks! I'll wait for the TextProvider problem to be fixed and then fire > up the release process. I start a new gig next week, so this will most > likely happen until/over the weekend. I solved these problems and was able to confirm that with test, but right now I want to prepare some test application with custom TextProvider and see how is it work. Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ http://dailylog.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceChris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3
without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note that xwork contains an embedded version of javassist by mistake. musachy On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Chris Pratt <thechrispratt@...> wrote: > That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries > and haven't had any problems. > (*Chris*) > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > >> hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist. >> >> musachy >> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> >> wrote: >> > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement >> > will satisfy lots of our users... >> > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) >> > >> > cheers, >> > Rainer >> > >> >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. >> >> >> >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: >> >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: >> >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just >> >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> -Dale >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Wes Wannemacher >> >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice >> >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more >> >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Rainer Hermanns >> > aixcept >> > Willibrordstraße 82 >> > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany >> > w: http://aixcept.de/ >> > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 >> > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 >> > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: ognl 2.7.3 performanceOops, I must not have looked close enough, I'm using OGNL 2.7.3 with
javassist-3.7.0.jar. (*Chris*) On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3 > without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note > that xwork contains an embedded version of javassist by mistake. > > musachy > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Chris Pratt <thechrispratt@...> > wrote: > > That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those > libraries > > and haven't had any problems. > > (*Chris*) > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> > wrote: > > > >> hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist. > >> > >> musachy > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermanns<hermanns@...> > >> wrote: > >> > +1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement > >> > will satisfy lots of our users... > >> > That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :) > >> > > >> > cheers, > >> > Rainer > >> > > >> >> Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released. > >> >> > >> >> On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield <dale@...> wrote: > >> >>> Musachy Barroso <musachy@...> wrote: > >> >>>> With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just > >> >>>> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also. > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 > >> >>> > >> >>> -Dale > >> >>> > >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Wes Wannemacher > >> >> Author - Struts 2 In Practice > >> >> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and > more > >> >> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Rainer Hermanns > >> > aixcept > >> > Willibrordstraße 82 > >> > 52134 Herzogenrath - Germany > >> > w: http://aixcept.de/ > >> > t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11 > >> > f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13 > >> > m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12 > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 - 3 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |