old style has a modern equivalent?

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

old style has a modern equivalent?

by Roger Pack-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Question.
Does this "old style" rdoc

    # Write ((|data|)) to a registry value named ((|name|)).

Have an equivalent (data and name were parameters).
Thanks!
-r


Re: old style has a modern equivalent?

by Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Roger Pack,

Why didn't you try to find the answers before start sending hundred of e-mails to the list?

Thanks!

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> wrote:
Question.
Does this "old style" rdoc

   # Write ((|data|)) to a registry value named ((|name|)).

Have an equivalent (data and name were parameters).
Thanks!
-r




--
Regards,

Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso
cel.: (11) 8187-8662
blog: rubz.org
engineer student at maua.br

"If you wanna be successful, you need total dedication, go for your last limit and give your best"

Re: old style has a modern equivalent?

by Roger Pack :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> Why didn't you try to find the answers before start sending hundred of
> e-mails to the list?

Sorry for the flood--I did indeed do my best with google for each one
[and even created some short tutorials for those with answer]
http://wiki.github.com/rogerdpack/ruby_code_tutorials/rdoc

Or did you mean comb through the source trying to find things?  I
hoped that wouldn't be necessary...
Obrigado.
-r


Re: old style has a modern equivalent?

by Ryan Davis-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Sep 22, 2009, at 15:58 , Roger Pack wrote:

> Or did you mean comb through the source trying to find things?  I
> hoped that wouldn't be necessary...

why is that? you're a developer. act like one.



Re: old style has a modern equivalent?

by Hugh Sasse :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Ryan Davis wrote:

>
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 15:58 , Roger Pack wrote:
>
> > Or did you mean comb through the source trying to find things?  I
> > hoped that wouldn't be necessary...
>
> why is that? you're a developer. act like one.
>

Maybe because if it can't be found on the web, then it's likely to
be a manual process, which developers don't like?

I think the answer to the multi-word hyperlink question, from my
reading of lib/rdoc/markup.rb is "put it in braces".  Untested.

I can't see the answer to the other one.

        Hugh
>


Re: old style has a modern equivalent?

by Eric Hodel :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Sep 22, 2009, at 15:14, Roger Pack wrote:

> Question.
> Does this "old style" rdoc
>
>    # Write ((|data|)) to a registry value named ((|name|)).
>
> Have an equivalent (data and name were parameters).

This has never been an RDoc style syntax.

You're probably thinking about RDtool