package url

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

package url

by Eric Blake :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Since autoconf 2.64 is now stable, and you have used it (or newer) for the past
couple of releases/snapshots, any objection to this patch?


From: Eric Blake <ebb9@...>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:12:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] build: use PACKAGE_URL

* src/system.h (emit_ancillary_info): Fix a FIXME.
* configure.ac (AC_PREREQ): Require 2.64.
---
 configure.ac |    2 +-
 src/system.h |    4 +---
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index fb963ee..e1b25fa 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@

 dnl Written by Jim Meyering.

-AC_PREREQ([2.61])
+AC_PREREQ([2.64])

 # Make inter-release version strings look like, e.g., v6.9-219-g58ddd, which
 # indicates that it is built from the 219th delta (in _some_ repository)
diff --git a/src/system.h b/src/system.h
index be7811b..73671df 100644
--- a/src/system.h
+++ b/src/system.h
@@ -587,9 +587,7 @@ emit_ancillary_info (void)
 {
   printf (_("\nReport %s bugs to %s\n"), last_component (program_name),
           PACKAGE_BUGREPORT);
-  /* FIXME 2010: use AC_PACKAGE_URL once we require autoconf-2.64 */
-  printf (_("%s home page: <http://www.gnu.org/software/%s/>\n"),
-          PACKAGE_NAME, PACKAGE);
+  printf (_("%s home page: <%s>\n"), PACKAGE_NAME, PACKAGE_URL);
   fputs (_("General help using GNU software: <http://www.gnu.org/gethelp/>\n"),
          stdout);
   /* Don't output this redundant message for English locales.
--
1.6.4.2






Re: package url

by Pádraig Brady :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Eric Blake wrote:
> Since autoconf 2.64 is now stable, and you have used it (or newer) for the past
> couple of releases/snapshots, any objection to this patch?

Too soon IMHO.
My F11 is on 2.63 for example.

cheers,
Pádraig.




Re: package url

by Jim Meyering :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> Since autoconf 2.64 is now stable, and you have used it (or newer) for the past
>> couple of releases/snapshots, any objection to this patch?
>
> Too soon IMHO.
> My F11 is on 2.63 for example.

I agree that it's too soon for something that's not a bug fix.
Perhaps at the end of 2010.