partcombine and \tag -> some notes (unrelated to the \tag command) are not printed

[Frédéric Bron]

When using \tag inside a music expression that is used as argument of
\partcombine, some notes (unrelated to the \tag command) are not
printed anymore.
In the following example, the last "c" of upper voice should be
printed but is not.
Happens with 2.12.2 and 2.13.6.

Frédéric

music = {
  \set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
  \partcombine \relative c' {
    \tag #'part e4 \tag #'full e4 f g a
    b r c r % this last c is not printed
  }
  \relative c' {
    c4 d e f
    g r a r
  }
}

\new Staff \keepWithTag #'part \music


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[Frédéric Bron]

> When using \tag inside a music expression that is used as argument of
> \partcombine, some notes (unrelated to the \tag command) are not
> printed anymore.
> In the following example, the last "c" of upper voice should be
> printed but is not.
> Happens with 2.12.2 and 2.13.6.
>
> Frédéric
>
> music = {
>  \set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
>  \partcombine \relative c' {
>    \tag #'part e4 \tag #'full e4 f g a
>    b r c r % this last c is not printed
>  }
>  \relative c' {
>    c4 d e f
>    g r a r
>  }
> }
>
> \new Staff \keepWithTag #'part \music

Hi folks, is it possible to record this in the bug tracker?
Regards,
Frédéric


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[Graham Percival-3]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:37:44PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > Happens with 2.12.2 and 2.13.6.
>
> Hi folks, is it possible to record this in the bug tracker?

I hate to do this, but please be patient.  The initial report was
Nov 1, and at the moment we're trying to reach a 1-week
turnaround.


That said, this looks like an excellent bug report, so I can't see
it taking more than 2 minutes to add.  James?
(as far as I know, Valentin is still working on the bug backlog)

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[Valentin Villenave]

2009/11/5 Graham Percival <graham@...>:
> I hate to do this

Since when? :-)

> That said, this looks like an excellent bug report, so I can't see
> it taking more than 2 minutes to add.

Hm, \tag is one of the many features I've never used nor tried to
understand. If James wants to address this, I won't be jealous :-)

> (as far as I know, Valentin is still working on the bug backlog)

I've brought said backlog down to one week or so. I can deal with
Frédéric's report, but there are older (more complex) reports that I'd
like to deal with first.

Cheers,
Valentin


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[Graham Percival-3]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:49:57PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/11/5 Graham Percival <graham@...>:
> > I hate to do this
>
> Since when? :-)

I like to give new contributors a few weeks to learn the ropes
before doing anything like chastising them.

> > That said, this looks like an excellent bug report, so I can't see
> > it taking more than 2 minutes to add.
>
> Hm, \tag is one of the many features I've never used nor tried to
> understand. If James wants to address this, I won't be jealous :-)

/me smacks his head

You don't need to understand anything.  The example is short.  It
claims that it should print a note.  Generate output.  Is there a
final c?  If no, dump it in the tracker.  If yes, ask him for more
details about his OS or lilypond version or whatever.

All you need to "understand" is "where should the dot indicating a
C appear on a treble staff".  If you're trying to understand
anything more than that, then you're not being an efficient bug
meister.

> > (as far as I know, Valentin is still working on the bug backlog)
>
> I've brought said backlog down to one week or so. I can deal with
> Frédéric's report, but there are older (more complex) reports that I'd
> like to deal with first.

Yes, I'd also like you to deal with those older reports.  That's
why I asked "James?" and added the line about you having other
tasks.

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[Frédéric Bron]

> I've brought said backlog down to one week or so. I can deal with
> Frédéric's report, but there are older (more complex) reports that I'd
> like to deal with first.

OK, sorry for pushing, I just wanted to be sure it was not lost.
Thanks for taking care of it, even if it is in one week, Frédéric


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[James E. Bailey-3]

On 05.11.2009, at 23:49, Valentin Villenave wrote:

> 2009/11/5 Graham Percival <graham@...>:
>> I hate to do this
>
> Since when? :-)
>
>> That said, this looks like an excellent bug report, so I can't see
>> it taking more than 2 minutes to add.
>
> Hm, \tag is one of the many features I've never used nor tried to
> understand. If James wants to address this, I won't be jealous :-)

Yeah, I don't understand \partcombine, but the example was clear enough.
I was waiting to see from anyone smarter than I if it was in any way  
related to #261. But it appears as though it isn't.

>
>> (as far as I know, Valentin is still working on the bug backlog)
>
> I've brought said backlog down to one week or so. I can deal with
> Frédéric's report, but there are older (more complex) reports that I'd
> like to deal with first.
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin

James E. Bailey



_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond