|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
please help me make sense of top's CPU outputHello,
I recently performed a CPU intensive task with Xorg. When I completed the task and Xorg no longer was using the CPU, I got this result from top: === last pid: 1201; load averages: 0.24, 0.10, 0.09 up 0+00:29:42 63 processes: 1 running, 62 sleeping CPU: 1.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.0% idle Mem: 161M Active, 67M Inact, 68M Wired, 1240K Cache, 41M Buf, 1676M Free Swap: 4060M Total, 4060M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU 1017 cstankevitz 1 104 0 366M 331M select 0 3:25 35.89% Xorg === Note that the "CPU" row reports 99% idle. Note that the "CPU" column reports 36% Xorg I have two questions: 1. Why do these two numbers seem to not agree? One reports the CPU is not being used, the other reports Xorg is using the CPU. 2. How can I change my system so that these two numbers seem to agree? Thank you, Chris PS: conky does the same thing -- I assume this means the seemingly disagreeing numbers are coming from the FreeBSD kernel. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: please help me make sense of top's CPU outputIn the last episode (Nov 02), Chris Stankevitz said:
> I recently performed a CPU intensive task with Xorg. When I completed the > task and Xorg no longer was using the CPU, I got this result from top: > > === > > last pid: 1201; load averages: 0.24, 0.10, 0.09 up 0+00:29:42 > 63 processes: 1 running, 62 sleeping > CPU: 1.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.0% idle > Mem: 161M Active, 67M Inact, 68M Wired, 1240K Cache, 41M Buf, 1676M Free > Swap: 4060M Total, 4060M Free > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU > 1017 cstankevitz 1 104 0 366M 331M select 0 3:25 35.89% Xorg The CPU column in the process list is a decaying average (more useful to the kernel scheduler than an instantaneous value). You'll see it slowly drop to 0 over 10-15 seconds. Junior Hacker Project: add an instantaneous-CPU value (calculated by subtracting successive ki_runtime values) to the list of things top calculates and toggle it and weighted-CPU when pressing C. The toggling code is already there; it just toggles between two different weighted-cpu values at the moment. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: please help me make sense of top's CPU outputDan Nelson wrote:
> Junior Hacker Project: add an instantaneous-CPU value (calculated by > subtracting successive ki_runtime values) to the list of things top > calculates and toggle it and weighted-CPU when pressing C. The toggling > code is already there; it just toggles between two different weighted-cpu > values at the moment. > Makes sense, thank you. If I want to hack a port program, I go to the "work" directory, edit the source, and rebuild. How do I hack a non-port program like top? Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: please help me make sense of top's CPU output2009/11/3 Chris Stankevitz <cstankevitz@...>:
> Dan Nelson wrote: >> >> Junior Hacker Project: add an instantaneous-CPU value (calculated by >> subtracting successive ki_runtime values) to the list of things top >> calculates and toggle it and weighted-CPU when pressing C. The toggling >> code is already there; it just toggles between two different weighted-cpu >> values at the moment. >> > > Makes sense, thank you. If I want to hack a port program, I go to the > "work" directory, edit the source, and rebuild. How do I hack a non-port > program like top? > > Chris Look in the Makefile for /usr/src/usr.bin/top, and you'll see the source is in /usr/src/contrib/top Hack away! Chris -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@..." |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |