Hi Daniel,
Thanks for letting us know! It's simply not implemented (and due to a
bug in CINT wrt conversions it somehow succeeds in calling a wrong
overload). I'll implement it next week and let you know.
Cheers, Axel.
On 2009-03-05 11:08,
daniel.barna@... wrote:
> Hi,
> Running the attached simple program results in the output
> (11616.5,0)
> which is obviously wrong. If I uncomment the function declarations,
> everything is fine: (0.707107,0.707107)
> This means there is something wrong with the sqrt(complex<double>)
> function in cint.
> My version is: 5.16.29
> Thanks
> Daniel