|

»

Boo Lang - Users

property macros

View: New views

5 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	property macros by horace3d@gmail.com :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message hi, i would like to do something like that: macro property: return [\| version as single: get: return _FLOAT(Marshal.ReadInt32(structure.version)) \|] but properties don't seem to be supported for macros. why? will this be possible in the future? i am trying to do a .net wrapper for a c-library and it would be extremely helpful if i could use macros for properties. i guess it would result in ten times less required code... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
	Re: property macros by Jeffery Olson :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message try yield instead of return On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM, horace <horace3d@...> wrote: > hi, > > i would like to do something like that: > > macro property: > return [\| > version as single: > get: return _FLOAT(Marshal.ReadInt32(structure.version)) > \|] > > but properties don't seem to be supported for macros. why? will this be > possible in the future? > > i am trying to do a .net wrapper for a c-library and it would be extremely > helpful if i could use macros for properties. i guess it would result in ten > times less required code... > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
	Re: property macros by horace3d@gmail.com :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jeffery Olson <olson.jeffery@...> wrote: try yield instead of return with yield the macro compiles without errors but the property i try to generate with it doesn't work. it seems like the property doesn't get created at all. what is the difference of yield and return if i only want to return something once? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM, horace <horace3d@...> wrote: > hi, > > i would like to do something like that: > > macro property: > return [\| > version as single: > get: return _FLOAT(Marshal.ReadInt32(structure.version)) > \|] > > but properties don't seem to be supported for macros. why? will this be > possible in the future? > > i am trying to do a .net wrapper for a c-library and it would be extremely > helpful if i could use macros for properties. i guess it would result in ten > times less required code... > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
	Re: property macros by Usul-4 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I have tried something similar and I see no issue... macro property: yield [\| public version as single: get: return 42 \|] class TestClass: property print "Runtime Version: " + typeof(List).Assembly.ImageRuntimeVersion print "Boo version:" + BooVersion print "TestClass version: " + TestClass().version >>> Runtime Version: v2.0.50727 Boo version:0.9.2.3383 TestClass version: 42 nb: added public because I'm in strict mode... If ever you still have this issue, please provide a self contained example (that doesn't depend on external things like _FLOAT and structure.version) 2009/10/6 horace <horace3d@...> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jeffery Olson <olson.jeffery@...> wrote: try yield instead of return with yield the macro compiles without errors but the property i try to generate with it doesn't work. it seems like the property doesn't get created at all. what is the difference of yield and return if i only want to return something once? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM, horace <horace3d@...> wrote: > hi, > > i would like to do something like that: > > macro property: > return [\| > version as single: > get: return _FLOAT(Marshal.ReadInt32(structure.version)) > \|] > > but properties don't seem to be supported for macros. why? will this be > possible in the future? > > i am trying to do a .net wrapper for a c-library and it would be extremely > helpful if i could use macros for properties. i guess it would result in ten > times less required code... > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang%2Bunsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@.... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=.
	Re: property macros by horace3d@gmail.com :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Usul Mouadib <mouadib@...> wrote: > > I have tried something similar and I see no issue... > > macro property: > yield [\| > public version as single: > get: return 42 > \|] > > class TestClass: > property > > print "Runtime Version: " + typeof(List).Assembly.ImageRuntimeVersion > print "Boo version:" + BooVersion > print "TestClass version: " + TestClass().version > >>>> > > Runtime Version: v2.0.50727 > Boo version:0.9.2.3383 > TestClass version: 42 > > > nb: added public because I'm in strict mode... > > > If ever you still have this issue, please provide a self contained example > (that doesn't depend on external things like _FLOAT and structure.version) my _FLOAT function (which is defined elsewhere - not in the macro file but in the project where the macro will get used) converts from a fixed point format to floating point. def _FLOAT(v as int) as single: return cast(single, v) / (1 << 10) thanks! i will try this again once i continue working on my wrapper project... > > > > > > 2009/10/6 horace <horace3d@...> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jeffery Olson <olson.jeffery@...> >> wrote: >>> >>> try yield instead of return >> >> >> with yield the macro compiles without errors but the property i try to >> generate with it doesn't work. it seems like the property doesn't get >> created at all. >> >> what is the difference of yield and return if i only want to return >> something once? >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM, horace <horace3d@...> wrote: >>> > hi, >>> > >>> > i would like to do something like that: >>> > >>> > macro property: >>> > return [\| >>> > version as single: >>> > get: return _FLOAT(Marshal.ReadInt32(structure.version)) >>> > \|] >>> > >>> > but properties don't seem to be supported for macros. why? will this be >>> > possible in the future? >>> > >>> > i am trying to do a .net wrapper for a c-library and it would be >>> > extremely >>> > helpful if i could use macros for properties. i guess it would result >>> > in ten >>> > times less required code... >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Boo Programming Language" group. >> To post to this group, send email to boolang@... >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> boolang+unsubscribe@... >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=en >> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Boo Programming Language" group. > To post to this group, send email to boolang@.... > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group. To post to this group, send email to boolang@.... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang?hl=.