|

»

»

pyAMF0.5 bug ?

View: New views

5 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	pyAMF0.5 bug ? by vitaly-18 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message hi, I've upgraded today to the pyamf0.5 and my server, the same exactly Twisted base server code, started on ANY request to respond TWICE!!! After downgrading back to pyamf0.4.2 - one request - one response, as expected. Example: -------- 2009-09-11 12:51:40,960 DEBUG [root:twisted:274] AMF Request: <Envelope amfVersion=0 clientType=3> (u'/2', <Request target=u'null'>[<RemotingMessage body=[u'test', u''] source=u'abc' timestamp=0 destination=u'ABC' clientId=None headers={'DSId': u'nil', 'DSEndpoint': u'remote'} timeToLive=0 messageId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' operation=u'hello_world_test' />]</Request>) </Envelope> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,027 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='c83bb4ba-fff5-4254-b75d-3f9c28d4ce86' headers={} timeToLive=None messageId='f23287ce-ac51-482b-ad90-9a0be1dd5b0b' correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,064 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='cf518970-a198-47a6-8db9-bad059b73dc1' headers={} timeToLive=None messageId='88e7b7dd-3d97-4a30-994f-cf4e91d8a713' correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> Any ideas ? _______________________________________________ PyAMF users mailing list - users@... http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users
	Re: pyAMF0.5 bug ? by Nick Joyce :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On 11 Sep 2009, at 19:21, vitaly@... wrote: > hi, > I've upgraded today to the pyamf0.5 and my server, the same exactly > Twisted base server code, started on ANY request to respond TWICE!!! > After downgrading back to pyamf0.4.2 - one request - one response, > as expected. > > Example: > -------- > > 2009-09-11 12:51:40,960 DEBUG [root:twisted:274] AMF Request: > <Envelope amfVersion=0 clientType=3> > (u'/2', <Request target=u'null'>[<RemotingMessage body=[u'test', > u''] source=u'abc' timestamp=0 destination=u'ABC' clientId=None > headers={'DSId': u'nil', 'DSEndpoint': u'remote'} timeToLive=0 > messageId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' > operation=u'hello_world_test' />]</Request>) > </Envelope> > > 2009-09-11 12:51:41,027 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: > <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] > timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='c83bb4ba-fff5-4254- > b75d-3f9c28d4ce86' headers={} timeToLive=None messageId='f23287ce- > ac51-482b-ad90-9a0be1dd5b0b' correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5- > AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> > > 2009-09-11 12:51:41,064 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: > <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] > timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='cf518970- > a198-47a6-8db9-bad059b73dc1' headers={} timeToLive=None > messageId='88e7b7dd-3d97-4a30-994f-cf4e91d8a713' > correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> > > > > Any ideas ? > > > _______________________________________________ > PyAMF users mailing list - users@... > http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users You are correct, this is a regression - see ticket 648 - http://pyamf.org/ticket/648 I have attached a patch to pyamf 0.5 for the fix, whilst 0.5.1 is prepped for release. Thanks for the catch! Nick _______________________________________________ PyAMF users mailing list - users@... http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users pyamf-twisted-double-encode-648.diff (1K) Download Attachment
	Re: pyAMF0.5 bug ? by vitaly-18 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message my pleasure. Do you guys have any release day for 0.5.1 ? Quoting "Nick Joyce" <nick@...>: > On 11 Sep 2009, at 19:21, vitaly@... wrote: > >> hi, >> I've upgraded today to the pyamf0.5 and my server, the same exactly >> Twisted base server code, started on ANY request to respond >> TWICE!!! >> After downgrading back to pyamf0.4.2 - one request - one response, >> as expected. >> >> Example: >> -------- >> >> 2009-09-11 12:51:40,960 DEBUG [root:twisted:274] AMF Request: >> <Envelope amfVersion=0 clientType=3> >> (u'/2', <Request target=u'null'>[<RemotingMessage body=[u'test', >> u''] source=u'abc' timestamp=0 destination=u'ABC' clientId=None >> headers={'DSId': u'nil', 'DSEndpoint': u'remote'} timeToLive=0 >> messageId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' >> operation=u'hello_world_test' />]</Request>) >> </Envelope> >> >> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,027 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='c83bb4ba-fff5-4254- >> b75d-3f9c28d4ce86' headers={} timeToLive=None messageId='f23287ce- >> ac51-482b-ad90-9a0be1dd5b0b' >> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5- AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >> >> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,064 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='cf518970- >> a198-47a6-8db9-bad059b73dc1' headers={} timeToLive=None >> messageId='88e7b7dd-3d97-4a30-994f-cf4e91d8a713' >> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >> >> >> >> Any ideas ? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PyAMF users mailing list - users@... >> http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > You are correct, this is a regression - see ticket 648 - > http://pyamf.org/ticket/648 > > I have attached a patch to pyamf 0.5 for the fix, whilst 0.5.1 is > prepped for release. > > Thanks for the catch! > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ PyAMF users mailing list - users@... http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users
	Re: pyAMF0.5 bug ? by Nick Joyce :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message This weekend, or early next week. On 11 Sep 2009, at 21:38, vitaly@... wrote: > > my pleasure. > > Do you guys have any release day for 0.5.1 ? > > Quoting "Nick Joyce" <nick@...>: > >> On 11 Sep 2009, at 19:21, vitaly@... wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> I've upgraded today to the pyamf0.5 and my server, the same >>> exactly Twisted base server code, started on ANY request to >>> respond TWICE!!! >>> After downgrading back to pyamf0.4.2 - one request - one >>> response, as expected. >>> >>> Example: >>> -------- >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:40,960 DEBUG [root:twisted:274] AMF Request: >>> <Envelope amfVersion=0 clientType=3> >>> (u'/2', <Request target=u'null'>[<RemotingMessage >>> body=[u'test', u''] source=u'abc' timestamp=0 destination=u'ABC' >>> clientId=None headers={'DSId': u'nil', 'DSEndpoint': u'remote'} >>> timeToLive=0 messageId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' >>> operation=u'hello_world_test' />]</Request>) >>> </Envelope> >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,027 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >>> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >>> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='c83bb4ba- >>> fff5-4254- b75d-3f9c28d4ce86' headers={} timeToLive=None >>> messageId='f23287ce- ac51-482b-ad90-9a0be1dd5b0b' >>> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5- AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,064 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >>> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >>> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='cf518970- >>> a198-47a6-8db9-bad059b73dc1' headers={} timeToLive=None >>> messageId='88e7b7dd-3d97-4a30-994f-cf4e91d8a713' >>> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >>> >>> >>> >>> Any ideas ? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PyAMF users mailing list - users@... >>> http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> You are correct, this is a regression - see ticket 648 - >> http://pyamf.org/ticket/648 >> >> I have attached a patch to pyamf 0.5 for the fix, whilst 0.5.1 is >> prepped for release. >> >> Thanks for the catch! >> >> Nick >> >> > > _______________________________________________ PyAMF users mailing list - users@... http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users
	Re: pyAMF0.5 bug ? by lists-144 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Did that patch fix the issue for you? Thijs On 11 Sep 2009, at 21:38, vitaly@... wrote: > > my pleasure. > > Do you guys have any release day for 0.5.1 ? > > Quoting "Nick Joyce" <nick@...>: > >> On 11 Sep 2009, at 19:21, vitaly@... wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> I've upgraded today to the pyamf0.5 and my server, the same >>> exactly Twisted base server code, started on ANY request to >>> respond TWICE!!! >>> After downgrading back to pyamf0.4.2 - one request - one >>> response, as expected. >>> >>> Example: >>> -------- >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:40,960 DEBUG [root:twisted:274] AMF Request: >>> <Envelope amfVersion=0 clientType=3> >>> (u'/2', <Request target=u'null'>[<RemotingMessage >>> body=[u'test', u''] source=u'abc' timestamp=0 destination=u'ABC' >>> clientId=None headers={'DSId': u'nil', 'DSEndpoint': u'remote'} >>> timeToLive=0 messageId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' >>> operation=u'hello_world_test' />]</Request>) >>> </Envelope> >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,027 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >>> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >>> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='c83bb4ba- >>> fff5-4254- b75d-3f9c28d4ce86' headers={} timeToLive=None >>> messageId='f23287ce- ac51-482b-ad90-9a0be1dd5b0b' >>> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5- AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >>> >>> 2009-09-11 12:51:41,064 DEBUG [root:twisted:156] AMF Response: >>> <Response status=/onResult><AcknowledgeMessage body=['Passed'] >>> timestamp=1252687900 destination=None clientId='cf518970- >>> a198-47a6-8db9-bad059b73dc1' headers={} timeToLive=None >>> messageId='88e7b7dd-3d97-4a30-994f-cf4e91d8a713' >>> correlationId=u'3485EC13-A4FA-1D78-08A5-AA045BAC57FA' /></Response> >>> >>> >>> >>> Any ideas ? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PyAMF users mailing list - users@... >>> http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> You are correct, this is a regression - see ticket 648 - >> http://pyamf.org/ticket/648 >> >> I have attached a patch to pyamf 0.5 for the fix, whilst 0.5.1 is >> prepped for release. >> >> Thanks for the catch! >> >> Nick >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > PyAMF users mailing list - users@... > http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ PyAMF users mailing list - users@... http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users PGP.sig (201 bytes) Download Attachment