reg:compatibility.h files

[Jinesh K J-2]

hi,

I have a small doubt,

i have a code which written using the headers and related files for libsigc++20-2.0.17-2. I now use a fedora 9 machine. It is having  libsigc++20-2.2.2-1. As there is only a minor version difference i thought it will not create much trouble. I think your sourceforge websie also says so. But it seems,


ocrbase.cc:28:34: error: sigc++/compatibility.h: No such file or directory

is missing and subsequently,

'SigC' has not been declared this also happens.


I think its a simple problem. Please help me if anybody here can

regards

Jinesh K J

My Feelings,Expressions-
http://logbookofanobserver.blogspot.com

My scribblings-
http://logbookofanobserver.wordpress.com

SMC : My computer, My language http://smc.org.in
സ്വതന്ത്ര മലയാളം കമ്പ്യൂട്ടിങ്ങ്, എന്റെ കമ്പ്യൂട്ടറിന് എന്റെ ഭാഷ
_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list

[Murray Cumming]

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:16 +0530, Jinesh K J wrote:

> hi,
>
> I have a small doubt,
>
> i have a code which written using the headers and related files for
> libsigc++20-2.0.17-2. I now use a fedora 9 machine. It is having
> libsigc++20-2.2.2-1. As there is only a minor version difference i
> thought it will not create much trouble. I think your sourceforge
> websie also says so. But it seems,
>
>
> ocrbase.cc:28:34: error: sigc++/compatibility.h: No such file or
> directory
>
> is missing and subsequently,
>
> 'SigC' has not been declared this also happens.
>
>
> I think its a simple problem. Please help me if anybody here can

No, this was intentional. That API was deprecated for a long time and
has now been removed.

You need to port to the real libsigc++ 2 API. In most cases you just
need to change SigC:: to sigc::

--
murrayc@...
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list

[Murray Cumming]

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:58 +0530, Jinesh K J wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have to check it myself and i found a little solutions. i am using
> only SigC::slot is sigc::slot the same?

Yes.



--
murrayc@...
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list