|

»

regressions in the binutils test suite on mips{,el}

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	regressions in the binutils test suite on mips{,el} by Matthias Klose :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Package: binutils Version: 2.19.51.20090827-1 Severity: serious Tags: help Regressions compared to 2.19.51.20090805-1 See: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mips&stamp=1251415690&file=log https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1251398762&file=log Test results, compared with installed binutils: W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (sb1) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (octeon) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16-64 W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16e save/restore W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16 W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc 2 W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 lui/addi W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32r2) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64r2) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (xlr) W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32) W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 1 W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 2 W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 interlinking for local functions 1 16 REGRESSIONS (1.05%). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: regressions in the binutils test suite on mips{,el} by Aurelien Jarno :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Matthias Klose a écrit : > Package: binutils > Version: 2.19.51.20090827-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: help > > Regressions compared to 2.19.51.20090805-1 > > See: > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mips&stamp=1251415690&file=log > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1251398762&file=log > > Test results, compared with installed binutils: > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (sb1) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (octeon) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16-64 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16e save/restore > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc 2 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 lui/addi > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32r2) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64r2) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (xlr) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32) > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 1 > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 2 > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 interlinking for > local functions 1 > 16 REGRESSIONS (1.05%). > > While they are real regressions that have to be fixed, we don't have MIPS16 binaries in Debian, so I am not sure this bug should be considered as serious. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@... http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...
	Re: Bug#544177: regressions in the binutils test suite on mips{,el} by Matthias Klose :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message severity 544177 important thanks On 31.08.2009 11:38, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > While they are real regressions that have to be fixed, we don't have > MIPS16 binaries in Debian, so I am not sure this bug should be > considered as serious. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...