renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by brettporter :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the  
other mail.

In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving  
components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? If so, would someone actively  
working on it like to make the move?

It may make sense to also/instead shift maven 2.2 to a corresponding  
maven2/ tree (retaining anything in components for historical  
purposes, of course). Opinions?

- Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by John Casey-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I think that the codebases are diverging enough that it makes sense to
separate them. I'd only say we should do this if we move both,
though...and I guess we'd need to move the maven 2.x branches over with
maven/* as well.

+1

-john

Brett Porter wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the
> other mail.
>
> In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving
> components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? If so, would someone actively
> working on it like to make the move?
>
> It may make sense to also/instead shift maven 2.2 to a corresponding
> maven2/ tree (retaining anything in components for historical purposes,
> of course). Opinions?
>
> - Brett
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by Benjamin Bentmann :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Brett Porter wrote:

> In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving
> components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN?

+0

There's already a maven-1 directory so for the sake of consistency I
would expect "maven-X" instead of "mavenX".


Benjamin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by John Casey-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Sure, that sounds fine for consistency. I do think this is a good idea
in concept, though.

Benjamin Bentmann wrote:

> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving
>> components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN?
>
> +0
>
> There's already a maven-1 directory so for the sake of consistency I
> would expect "maven-X" instead of "mavenX".
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by Ralph Goers :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the  
> other mail.
>
> In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving  
> components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? If so, would someone  
> actively working on it like to make the move?
>
> It may make sense to also/instead shift maven 2.2 to a corresponding  
> maven2/ tree (retaining anything in components for historical  
> purposes, of course). Opinions?
>
> - Brett
>

+1 to maven3/trunk or maven-3/trunk.

Ralph


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by Jason van Zyl-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I have a massive checkin coming and when I'm finished that I'll sync  
up with Benjamin and swizzle the branches.

On 7-Jul-09, at 2:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

>
> On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did some of the branch and version maintenance I mentioned in the  
>> other mail.
>>
>> In the spirit of "fresh start", does it make sense for moving  
>> components/trunk to maven3/trunk in SVN? If so, would someone  
>> actively working on it like to make the move?
>>
>> It may make sense to also/instead shift maven 2.2 to a  
>> corresponding maven2/ tree (retaining anything in components for  
>> historical purposes, of course). Opinions?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>
> +1 to maven3/trunk or maven-3/trunk.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/SonatypeNexus
http://twitter.com/SonatypeM2E
----------------------------------------------------------

What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good people  
can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad people.

  -- Paul Graham


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: renaming components/trunk to maven3/trunk?

by brettporter :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On 08/07/2009, at 3:31 AM, John Casey wrote:

> I think that the codebases are diverging enough that it makes sense  
> to separate them. I'd only say we should do this if we move both,  
> though...and I guess we'd need to move the maven 2.x branches over  
> with maven/* as well.

So here's what I'm thinking:

svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/branches
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/tags
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.2.0 
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/tags (just as an  
additional reference)
svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/branches/maven-2.2.x 
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/branches (adjust POMs  
for SCM)
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/branches/maven-2.2.x 
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-2/trunk (adjust POMs  
for SCM and version to 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT)

(retain components/ for all maven 2.0.x and 2.1.x releases)

svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-3
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-3/branches
svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-3/tags

(Leaving here for Jason to move components/trunk over later)

WDYT?

- Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...