|

»

rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj

View: New views

10 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj by HT4N - :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy. I have quite a big grammar now, and basically I have multiple grammars separated into many files and at the root grammar I have many alternations like the following: Root = GrammarA \| GrammarB ... \| GrammarZ It looks like, the compiler complaining about the size of the inline code. Here is the error message from the compiler: "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" What is the solution to this issue? If I move the grammar definition to .cpp files will it help? Thanks HTan Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj by Jeff Flinn :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message HT4N - wrote: > I have quite a big grammar now, and basically I have multiple grammars > separated into many files and at the root grammar I have many > alternations like the following: > > Root = GrammarA > \| GrammarB > ... > \| GrammarZ > > It looks like, the compiler complaining about the size of the inline code. > > Here is the error message from the compiler: > > "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number > of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" > > What is the solution to this issue? Umm, did you try compiling with /bigobj? Jeff _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj by HT4N - :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy. I did, and it still did not help for "debug" build. For retail build anyway I don't see problem. What is the common practice if you have let's say more than 30 grammar modules and each grammar has around 5-10 lines of EBNF and you want to separate each grammar into 1 header file. Thanks HT > To: boost-users@... > From: TriumphSprint2000@... > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:15:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj > > HT4N - wrote: > > I have quite a big grammar now, and basically I have multiple grammars > > separated into many files and at the root grammar I have many > > alternations like the following: > > > > Root = GrammarA > > \| GrammarB > > ... > > \| GrammarZ > > > > It looks like, the compiler complaining about the size of the inline code. > > > > Here is the error message from the compiler: > > > > "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number > > of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" > > > > What is the solution to this issue? > > Umm, did you try compiling with /bigobj? > > Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@... > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	[Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by HT4N - :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy. Rename the subject. What is the suggested practice if you have a fairly big grammar which you split into many header files ? To repeat my problem, I have fairly big grammar and the compiler throws me the following error (for debug build). Retail build is fine. Usig /bigobj does not fix the debug build. > > "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number > > of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" From: ht4n@... To: boost-users@... Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:47:52 -0800 Subject: Re: [Boost-users] rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj I did, and it still did not help for "debug" build. For retail build anyway I don't see problem. What is the common practice if you have let's say more than 30 grammar modules and each grammar has around 5-10 lines of EBNF and you want to separate each grammar into 1 header file. Thanks HT > To: boost-users@... > From: TriumphSprint2000@... > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:15:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj > > HT4N - wrote: > > I have quite a big grammar now, and basically I have multiple grammars > > separated into many files and at the root grammar I have many > > alternations like the following: > > > > Root = GrammarA > > \| GrammarB > > ... > > \| GrammarZ > > > > It looks like, the compiler complaining about the size of the inline code. > > > > Here is the error message from the compiler: > > > > "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number > > of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" > > > > What is the solution to this issue? > > Umm, did you try compiling with /bigobj? > > Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@... > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: number of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj by OvermindDL1 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:47 PM, HT4N - <ht4n@...> wrote: > I did, and it still did not help for "debug" build. For retail build anyway > I don't see problem. > > What is the common practice if you have let's say more than 30 grammar > modules and each grammar has around 5-10 lines of EBNF and you want to > separate each grammar into 1 header file. The mini-c example project shows how to split up grammars properly, may take a look at it. Also, you will get more responses if you post to the Spirit list instead. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by Joel de Guzman-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message HT4N - wrote: > > Rename the subject. > > What is the suggested practice if you have a fairly big grammar which > you split into many header files ? > > To repeat my problem, I have fairly big grammar and the compiler throws > me the following error (for debug build). Retail build is fine. Usig > /bigobj does not fix the debug build. > > *> > "boost\spirit\core\non_terminal\impl\rule.ipp(173) : error C1128: > number > > > of sections exceeded object file format limit : compile with /bigobj" I highly suggest moving to spirit2 if you are planning to do any refactorization. In spirit2 (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/) we have some examples that highlight this: calc6, calc7 and mini_c are examples of modular grammar constructions. calc6 is simplest of the three and shows how you can: 1) embed grammars for modularization 2) separate the grammar definition (constructor) from the class declaration 3) instantiate a particular grammar template in a cpp file. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net http://www.facebook.com/djowel Meet me at BoostCon http://www.boostcon.com/home http://www.facebook.com/boostcon _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by Ray Burkholder :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message > I highly suggest moving to spirit2 if you are planning to do any > refactorization. In spirit2 (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/) > we have some examples that highlight this: > > calc6, calc7 and mini_c are examples of modular grammar constructions. > calc6 is simplest of the three and shows how you can: > > 1) embed grammars for modularization > 2) separate the grammar definition (constructor) from the class > declaration > 3) instantiate a particular grammar template in a cpp file. > Would you be able to provide a direct link to the calc6, calc7 examples? They don't appear to be directly linked or described on the documentation page at: http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/spirit2/libs/spirit/doc/html/index.html Thank you. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by Chris Hoeppler :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Sunday 08 November 2009, Ray Burkholder wrote: > > I highly suggest moving to spirit2 if you are planning to do any > > refactorization. In spirit2 (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/) > > we have some examples that highlight this: > > > > calc6, calc7 and mini_c are examples of modular grammar constructions. > > calc6 is simplest of the three and shows how you can: > > > > 1) embed grammars for modularization > > 2) separate the grammar definition (constructor) from the class > > declaration > > 3) instantiate a particular grammar template in a cpp file. > > Would you be able to provide a direct link to the calc6, calc7 examples? > They don't appear to be directly linked or described on the documentation > page at: > http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/spirit2/libs/spirit/doc/html/index.html http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/spirit/example/qi/calc6/ HTH, Chris _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by HT4N - :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy. To be honest I am a little bit confuse with the examples you mentioned. I do not see where the grammar is now defined in the .cpp file from the example. I only see a declaration of grammar in .hpp. I would have expect that the Grammar header is defined in .hpp but the actual EBNF definition is defined in .cpp. Hence, I do not see example of (2) in the examples, unless I miss something. About your point (1), I think Classic Spirit also support this. You can have a rule that embed a grammar which is defined in a different file. > From: hoeppler@... > To: boost-users@... > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:33:16 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar > > On Sunday 08 November 2009, Ray Burkholder wrote: > > > I highly suggest moving to spirit2 if you are planning to do any > > > refactorization. In spirit2 (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/) > > > we have some examples that highlight this: > > > > > > calc6, calc7 and mini_c are examples of modular grammar constructions. > > > calc6 is simplest of the three and shows how you can: > > > > > > 1) embed grammars for modularization > > > 2) separate the grammar definition (constructor) from the class > > > declaration > > > 3) instantiate a particular grammar template in a cpp file. > > > > Would you be able to provide a direct link to the calc6, calc7 examples? > > They don't appear to be directly linked or described on the documentation > > page at: > > http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/spirit2/libs/spirit/doc/html/index.html > > http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/spirit/example/qi/calc6/ > > HTH, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@... > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
	Re: [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar by Hartmut Kaiser :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message > To be honest I am a little bit confuse with the examples you mentioned. > I do not see where the grammar is now defined in the .cpp file from the > example. I only see a declaration of grammar in .hpp. > > I would have expect that the Grammar header is defined in .hpp but the > actual EBNF definition is defined in .cpp. Hence, I do not see example > of (2) in the examples, unless I miss something. But that's exactly what has been done. The grammar/rule definitions are located in the constructors of the grammars which have been moved out into separate files. > About your point (1), I think Classic Spirit also support this. You > can have a rule that embed a grammar which is defined in a different > file. Sure, but it's more difficult to achieve. Regards Hartmut ------------------- Meet me at BoostCon http://boostcon.com > > > > From: hoeppler@... > > To: boost-users@... > > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:33:16 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Spirit] Problem with fairly big grammar > > > > On Sunday 08 November 2009, Ray Burkholder wrote: > > > > I highly suggest moving to spirit2 if you are planning to do any > > > > refactorization. In spirit2 (http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/) > > > > we have some examples that highlight this: > > > > > > > > calc6, calc7 and mini_c are examples of modular grammar > constructions. > > > > calc6 is simplest of the three and shows how you can: > > > > > > > > 1) embed grammars for modularization > > > > 2) separate the grammar definition (constructor) from the class > > > > declaration > > > > 3) instantiate a particular grammar template in a cpp file. > > > > > > Would you be able to provide a direct link to the calc6, calc7 > examples? > > > They don't appear to be directly linked or described on the > > > documentation page at: > > > > http://spirit.sourceforge.net/home/spirit2/libs/spirit/doc/html/inde > > > x.html > > > > http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/spirit/example/qi/calc6/ > > > > HTH, > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Boost-users mailing list > > Boost-users@... > > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > ________________________________________ > Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@... http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users