|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
s-p-u: security update for xfs package(CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list)
Hey there, I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a the security issue 1447 [1], #521107 [2]. This was checked with the security team and is a non-dsa case. The debdiff: http://people.debian.org/~luciano/xfs/xfs.debdiff Builded: http://people.debian.org/~luciano/xfs/ Cheers, luciano [1] https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1447 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/521107 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs packageHi,
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:16 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: > (CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list) > > Hey there, > I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a the > security issue 1447 [1], #521107 [2]. This was checked with the security team > and is a non-dsa case. >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with the proposed fix (which of those two options is applicable wasn't entirely clear to me as there's no reply to his last message in the log). Is that the case? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs packageOn Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:16 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: > > (CC is appreciated. I'm not following this list) > > > > Hey there, > > I would like to upload a new xfs package to stable in order to fix a the > > security issue 1447 [1], #521107 [2]. This was checked with the security team > > and is a non-dsa case. > > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with > the proposed fix (which of those two options is applicable wasn't > entirely clear to me as there's no reply to his last message in the > log). Is that the case? > updating the bug log. Luciano's last patch seems fine. I still believe this is a pretty minor issue, and I think it should be fixed in sid before being considered for stable, but I don't have an objection to this update. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs packageOn Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer > > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with > > the proposed fix (which of those two options is applicable wasn't > > entirely clear to me as there's no reply to his last message in the > > log). Is that the case? > > > This was clarified in a private discussion with Luciano, sorry for not > updating the bug log. Ah; thanks for the clarification. > Luciano's last patch seems fine. I still believe this is a pretty minor > issue, and I think it should be fixed in sid before being considered for > stable, but I don't have an objection to this update. >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems arise. :) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs packageEl Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in > > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems > arise. :) So, I made the QA upload few minutes ago. luciano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs packageOn Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in > > > > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems > > arise. :) > > So, I made the QA upload few minutes ago. As that upload has now migrated to testing without any reported issues, please go ahead with the upload to p-u. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |