On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:03 PM, huntc<
huntc@...> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I just used the concurrentConsumers parameter of the seda component and fell
> into the trap of not including parameters in the producer URI. Having to
> have the producer and consumer specify the same parameters seems troublesome
> and non-intuitive. Additionally the producer URI shouldn't have to concern
> itself with how the exchange will be consumed and doesn't elsewhere in
> Camel.
>
> Do you think that this should be recognised as an issue to be fixed?
Already fixed in 2.0m3. I cant remember if we back-ported it to 1.x.
There is a JIRA ticket about it.
>
> Kind regards,
> Christopher
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/seda-uris-for-producers-and-consumers-tp24735545p24735545.html> Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Open Source Integration:
http://fusesource.comBlog:
http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/Twitter:
http://twitter.com/davsclaus