should .po files be cleaned?

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

should .po files be cleaned?

by Ben Pfaff :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

po/automake.mk has this:
        CLEANFILES += $(POFILES) $(GMOFILES) $(POTFILE)

Aren't $(POFILES) source files that we should preserve?
(especially if "configure" is run in the source tree)
--
"Long noun chains don't automatically imply security."
--Bruce Schneier


_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
pspp-dev@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: should .po files be cleaned?

by John Darrington-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

You are right.  POFILES should only be removed if the builddir is
distinct from the srcdir.  If they are not removed from the builddir, then
make distcheck  will complain.

On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:58:06PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     po/automake.mk has this:
             CLEANFILES += $(POFILES) $(GMOFILES) $(POTFILE)
     
     Aren't $(POFILES) source files that we should preserve?
     (especially if "configure" is run in the source tree)
     --
     "Long noun chains don't automatically imply security."
     --Bruce Schneier

--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.




_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
pspp-dev@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment